Comparison between effects of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and manual myofascial release on pain, range of motion and function in myofascial pain syndrome of upper trapezius - A randomized controlled trial.

Background: Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a muscle pain disorder characterized by the presence of Myofascial Trigger Point (MTrP) within a taut band, local tenderness, referral of pain to a distant site, restricted range of motion, and autonomic phenomena. The upper trapezius is the muscle most often affected by MTrPs. Manual myofascial release (MFR) and Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) are techniques of soft tissue release that are used to resolve MPS. Fifty six percent of physiotherapists complain of pain in multiple areas due to the massage and manual therapy that they have to perform. Objective: The objective of this study is to find whether IASTM is better than manual MFR in treating patients with MPS in upper trapezius. Methods: This study was a single-blinded randomized controlled trial that included 31 participants, both males and females between the age groups of 18-50 years. Participants were randomly divided into two groups. Three sessions were given over a period of one week for both groups. Group A received IASTM along with conventional treatment and Group B received Manual MFR along with the conventional treatment. The outcome measures evaluated were pain, cervical range of motion, pain pressure threshold (PPT) of trigger points, and the neck disability index. Pre- and post-measurements were taken and the analysis was done. Results: Both the treatment methods significantly reduced pain, improved PPT, range of motion, and function. The effects between the groups showed that IASTM was significantly better than manual MFR to reduce pain. The improvement in PPT, range of motion and function were equal in both the groups. Conclusion: IASTM and manual MFR both are effective individually as treatment procedures for pain, PPT, range of motion, and function. Neither of the treatment options can be considered better that the other. The clinician can decide based on the availability of the instrument, training, patient's preference, and his/her comfort whether which of the two treatment methods should be used.

Minimally invasive treatment for idiopathic chondrolysis of the hip: analysis of forty-one cases.

PURPOSE: Idiopathic chondrolysis of the hip is characterized by the loss of the articular cartilage of the hip joint with spectrum ranging from full recovery to fibrous ankylosis. Study assessed outcomes following intra-articular steroid injections, joint manipulation and traction immobilization. METHODS: Retrospective (2012-2021) review of 41 cases treated for idiopathic chondrolysis of hip, assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively (minimum 2-year follow-up) using Children's Hospital Oakland Hip Evaluation Score (CHOHES), visual analogue scale (VAS) and range of motion measurements. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (62%) achieved painless mobility, 6 (14%) had hip stiffness without pain and 10 (24%) had painful and stiff hips at final follow-up. They had a mean age of 12.49 ± 2.4 years and a mean follow-up duration of 33.15 ± 13.1 months. Range of motion improved significantly (p < 0.05). VAS improved to 3.93 ± 1.3 from 7.8 ± 0.7. CHOHES improved from 29.12 ± 9.9 to 56.37 ± 17.6. CONCLUSION: Intra-articular steroid injection, manipulation and traction immobilization may effectively treat idiopathic chondrolysis of the hip by enhancing patient function and reducing the need for further surgical intervention.

Functional Outcome of Mechanical Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery: A Short-Term Cohort Study at an Indian Tertiary Care Hospital.

Background: In severe arthritis cases, goal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) management is to attain pain-free joint and restore the overall limb alignment. There are limited short-term studies published from Indian hospitals that investigated the importance of neutral mechanical component alignment in TKA patients. Methods: Retrospective and prospective study was conducted at the Department of orthopaedics, Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Pune from June 2020 to September 2022. Enrolled patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using clinical examination, radiological assessment and functional outcomes through the Oxford knee score, Knee society score and VAS score. Results: 204 patients enrolled, and 267 knees were evaluated for the study. Osteoarthritis was the commonest diagnosis (254 knees, 95.13%). Pre-operatively, 92.13% knees were varus, 4.87% valgus and 3% neutral while post-operatively, 51.69% were varus, 16.1% were valgus, and 32.32% were with neutral axis. Majority of patients with a pre-operative neutral axis converted to varus axis (62.5%), while most valgus axis cases preoperatively converted to a neutral axis (53.84%). For pre-operative varus subgroup, the majority patients with < 10° pre-operative axis converted to neutral (41.28%). Majority patients with 10°-20° pre-operative axis remained varus (60.53%) and with > 20° pre-operative axis remained varus (78.26%). Functional outcome parameters were significantly improved at follow-up (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Short-term postoperative functional scores were significantly improved in postoperative cases, with the postoperative alignment of 0° ± 3° relative to the mechanical axis was achieved. Thus, postoperative neutral mechanical alignment of 0° ± 3° can be the standard of care for patients undergoing TKA.

Labral Support Shelf Acetabuloplasty for Late Presenting Perthes Disease: Outcomes in Indian Patients.

Introduction: The treatment of late-presenting Perthes disease with extrusion is controversial and debatable. One of the options available is the labral shelf acetabuloplasty (LSA). Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of LSA in late-presenting Perthes disease in terms of clinic-radiological outcome measures. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients with late presenting Perthes disease (Elizabethtown stage 2B onwards) treated by LSA by 2 experienced paediatric orthopaedic surgeons was performed. Data was collected of clinical parameters such as hip range of motion(ROM) and Harris Hip score and radiological parameters such as acetabular height, width and volume, shelf width, Centre Edge angle(CEA) and the lateral extrusion. Results: Thirty-five patients (28 males and 7 females) treated between 2012 to 2019 were analyzed. Majority were in Elizabethtown stage 3A (23) followed by 2B and 3B (12 each). At a mean follow up of 36 months, the hip ROM and the Harris Hip Score (from 65 ± 3.5 to 81.33 ± 7.12) improved significantly and there was a statistically significant improvement in terms of all radiological parameters. Majority of the hips were in Stulberg grade 3 (20) followed by grade 1 and 2 (7 each) and Stulberg 4 (1). There were no major complications in any of the patients of the series. Conclusion: Labral support shelf acetabuloplasty is a valuable surgery for late presenting Perthes disease and helps in maintenance of good coverage and allows restoration of range of motion over time.

"Critical pedicle wall" breaches analysis in complex spinal deformity using O-arm navigation.

Background: Free-hand and fluoroscopic-guided pedicle screw placement has been associated with higher rates of pedicle breaches (frequency range 15-40% especially in deformed pedicles). Neurological complications are more "critical" (i.e., frequent and significant) with medial and inferior pedicle-wall breaches due to the proximity of the neural elements. Here, we analyzed the effectiveness of O-arm navigation in minimizing "critical" pedicle wall breaches and their complications in 21 complex spinal deformity cases. Methods: Twenty-one complex spinal deformity cases were prospectively managed with O-arm-navigated posterior-instrumented fusions. Preoperative assessment included; evaluation of the type of scoliosis, the magnitude of the deformity, and the anatomy of the pedicles - (i.e., classified using Watanabe et al.). The O-arm was used to confirm and grade both the intraoperative and postoperative location of screws. Other variables analyzed included; duration of surgery, estimated blood loss, complications, and radiation exposure. Results: In 21 patients, 259 (63.45%) of 384 pedicles were instrumented; we observed 22 of 259 pedicle screw breaches. Significant (>2 mm) breaches were observed in two medial and one inferior wall cases that required revision; the overall biomechanically significant screw breach rate was (3/259) 1.2% with an accuracy rate of 98.8%. Pedicle screw placement resulted in another 14 nonsignificant (<2 mm) breaches; ten were medial and four involved the inferior wall. As anterior, lateral, and "in-out-in" trajectory pedicle screws beaches were nonsignificant, they were not included in our analysis. Conclusion: O-arm navigation decreased the incidence of medial and inferior (i.e., >2 mm "critical") pedicle screw breaches applied in 21 patients with deformed pedicles due to scoliosis. Further, the O-arm minimized the operating time, decreased the estimated blood loss, and reduced the incidence of complications.

Osteoporosis - An Imminent Ethical and Legal Debacle?

Osteoporosis is a condition characterized by a decrease in bone density. Its prevalence is on the rise and is only going to continue to rise further. Fragility fractures such as neck of femur fracture fractures and intertrochanteric fractures are among the most common fractures encountered by orthopedic surgeons today. Yet, the management of these fragility fractures has unfortunately fallen short of addressing the etiology behind the fracture. Orthopedic surgeons routinely perform arthroplasty or osteosynthesis for stabilization of these fractures, but rarely do they address the coexisting osteoporosis. We explore the factors, leading to this scenario, the practical hurdles faced, the ethical and legal considerations on the matter, and the road ahead. We believe that this is a topic which should be discussed further among orthopedic surgeons to arrive at practical solutions and change in perspectives. The aim of this article was to encourage a debate on the matter, increase awareness about the current situation, and help change the trend in the management of osteoporosis in developing countries like India.

What does a department need to get involved in clinical trials?

Clinical trials are conducted to evaluate the usefulness of a drug, medical treatment, surgical intervention, radiological procedure, behavioral intervention, or preventive health care strategy. Clinical trials are challenging, time-consuming, and need careful planning and execution. There are certain requirements for an academic unit to be ready for conducting quality research, especially clinical trials. These include logistical concerns, infrastructure, appropriately trained human resources, conformity with ethical compliances and regulatory compliances as per the laws governing the respective geographical regions. Infrastructure requirements include research division space, robust data archival system, archival of imaging data, laboratory services, information technology division and facilities for the appropriate consenting process. Human resources such as principal investigators, data managers, clinical research assistants and biostatisticians are needed to execute the clinical trial as per the study design. Adherence to ethical and regulatory standards; during the conduct of the clinical trial are imperative. Strict compliance with prevailing governing laws in the country is a prerequisite for a department to get involved in clinical trials. The department also needs to put in place an institutional ethics committee; the composition of which is often governed by regulatory laws. The ethical aspects of the trial undergo a formal scrutiny by an Institute ethics committee that ensures quality care to the patient, and safeguards the patient's rights and privileges. The academic unit of any department forms the core for possible research and pursuit of clinical trials. A department with rich clinical experience and expertise in the filed aids in the execution of quality research. The academic department must consider grant writing and multiple center collaborative research projects in due course of time to further enhance the quality of clinical trials and research output.

Efficacy of less Invasive modified O-arm navigated delta fixation in osteoporotic high-grade spondylolisthesis: "a LIMO delta technique".

PURPOSE: In 1994, the technique of transdiscal screws fixation in spondylolisthesis was introduced but did not gained popularity as it failed to address problems with spinal sagittal imbalance, retroverted pelvis, pseudoarthrosis, implant failure and neural injury. Majority of problems were due to lack of clear indications; hence, in this study, with modification of traditional technique and use of O-arm navigation for selected group of patients, we have addressed the above problems and given good to excellent functional outcomes. METHODS: We did prospective study on 15 patients with osteoporotic high-grade spondylolisthesis Meyerding grade 3 & 4 admitted in period 2020-2021. Intraoperative assessment was done in form of blood loss, incision length, operative time and complications. The preoperative & postoperative assessment was done in the form of clinical and radiological parameters. RESULTS: The average follow-up was of 21.2 months (18-24 months). There was no significant difference between pre- & postoperative spinopelvic parameters. Intraoperative average blood loss was 100 ml (90-120 ml) with mean surgical time of 138 min (120-150 min). Incision length was about 5-6-cms-posterior midline with two paraspinal 1-cm incisions for transdiscal screws. Patients were mobilized on postoperative day-2. There was statistically significant improvement in mean ODI, COMI and VAS for LBP and radicular pain with no intra- or postoperative complication observed till latest follow-up with all patients showing solid monoblock fusion on 1-year follow-up CT scan. CONCLUSIONS: LIMO delta technique is a newly modified version of conventional transdiscal screw technique. Minimal incision, decreased blood loss & operative time with in situ 3-column rigid fixation and solid fusion minimizing risk of complications makes this novel technique safer, simpler & effective in osteoporotic HGS.