High-dose pulse methylprednisolone vs. dexamethasone standard therapy for severe and critical COVID-19 pneumonia: Efficacy assessment in a retrospective single-centre experience from Malaysia.

INTRODUCTION: The use of dexamethasone (DXM) has been associated with decreased mortality in the patients with hypoxemia during the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, while the outcomes with methylprednisolone (MTP) have been mixed. This real-life study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with severe respiratory failure due to COVID-19 who were treated with high doses of MTP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled hospitalised patients between May 2021 and August 2021, aged 18 years and above, with severe respiratory failure defined by a ratio of oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen (SF ratio) of less than 235. The treatment protocol involved administering high-dose MTP for 3 days, followed by DXM, and the outcomes were compared with those of patients who received DXM alone (total treatment duration of 10 days for both groups). RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were enrolled, with 79 (79.8%) receiving pulse MTP therapy and 20 (20.2%) being treated with DXM only. The SF ratio significantly improved from a mean of 144.49 (±45.16) at baseline to 208 (±85.19) at 72 hours (p < 0.05), with a mean difference of 63.51 (p < 0.001) in patients who received ≤750 mg of MTP. Additionally, in patients who received >750 mg of MTP, the SF ratio improved from a baseline mean of 130.39 (±34.53) to 208.44 (±86.61) at 72 hours (p < 0.05), with a mean difference of 78.05 (p = 0.001). In contrast, patients who received DXM only demonstrated an SF ratio of 132.85 (±44.1) at baseline, which changed minimally to 133.35 (±44.4) at 72 hours (p = 0.33), with a mean difference of 0.50 (p = 0.972). The incidence of nosocomial infection was higher in the MTP group compared with the DXM group (40.5% vs. 35%, p = 0.653), with a relative risk of 1.16 (95% CI: 0.60-2.23). CONCLUSION: MTP did not demonstrate a significant reduction in intubation or intensive care unit admissions. Although a high dose of MTP improved gas exchange in patients with severe and critical COVID-19, it did not provide an overall mortality benefit compared to standard treatment.

Dégénérescence carcinomateuse d'une maladie de Ménétrier. A propos d'une observation et revue de la littérature

La maladie de Ménétrier est une affection rare caractérisée par l'hypertrophie des gros plis gastriques avec un risque accru de dégénérescence. Si la cause reste inconnue, il a été mis en évidence récemment une expression du facteur de croissance épidermique sur les cellules pathologiques de la muqueuse gastrique. Une femme de 25 ans a été reçue pour des épigastralgies associées à des vomissements. L'endoscopie digestive haute évoquait une gastropathie hypertrophique ulcéro-infiltrative évocatrice de dégénérescence de maladie de Ménétrier confirmée par l'histologie (adénocarcinome peu différencié). La patiente a reçu une chimiothérapie par paclitaxel + cysplatine pour obtenir une survie de 6 mois. La Maladie de Ménétrier découverte à un stade précoce est curable. La découverte tardive chez notre patient soulève le problème de l'endoscopie digestive haute chez le sujet jeune devant toute épigastralgie persistante

Evaluación del conocimiento de los padres de la técnica de aerosolterapia con aerocámara / Evaluation of parental knowledge of the aerosol technique with holding chamber

Introducción. Los episodios de tos, disnea y sibilancias son causa frecuente de consulta pediátrica. Su tratamiento de elección es la administración de fármacos a través de la aerosolterapia. El éxito de esta estrategia depende de la correcta aplicación de la técnica inhalatoria. Objetivo. Evaluar el conocimiento de padres de niños con patología obstructiva recurrente de la vía aérea en el uso de la aerosolterapia con aerocámara. Población y métodos. Estudio transversal, observacional, descriptivo. Se incluyeron aleatoriamente padres de niños menores de 6 años con tos, disnea y/o sibilancias con antecedentes de uso de aerocámara en la consulta al Servicio de Pediatría y/o de Alergia e Inmunología. Se evaluó el conocimiento en el empleo del inhalador mediante observación de la técnica. Resultados. Se incluyeron 114 niños, 51% masculino, con una edad promedio de 29,23 meses (DE=18,30). La persona a cargo de realizar la aerosolterapia tenía una media de edad de 32,28 años (DE=5,29); la mayoría de los responsables evaluados fueron madres (92,98%), con nivel de educación superior (71,05%). La forma de aprendizaje de la técnica fue demostrativa visual en 62 casos (54,4%), y el principal instructor de la misma fue el pediatra. Se demostró que 68 (72%) padres no realizaban en forma correcta la técnica y se encontró asociación entre edad del paciente y la correcta realización de la aerosolterapia (r=0,21; p=0,03). Conclusión. La mayoría de los padres realizan la aerosolterapia de forma incorrecta y la edad del niño influye en la técnica de la terapia inhalatoria.(AU)

Introduction. Symptoms of cough, dyspnea and wheezing are common cause for medical consultation. Their treatment is the administration of drugs through the aerosol. The success of this strategy depends on the correct application of inhalation technique. Objective. To evaluate the knowledge of parents of children with recurrent obstructive airway disease in the use of aerosol therapy with valved holding chamber. Population and Methods. Cross-sectional, observational, descriptive study. Randomly included parents of children under six years with cough, dyspnea and / or wheezing with a background of use in the office holding chamber of Pediatric and / or of Allergy and Immunology section of an Hospital. We evaluated the knowledge about the inhaler technique by medical observation. Results. We included 114 children, 51% male, with an average age of 29.23 months (SD=18.30). The median age o the caregiver responsible for conducting the aerosol therapy was 32.28 years (SD=5.29); the majority of evaluated makers were mothers (92.98%) with higher education level (71.05%). The most frequent way for learning was the visual demonstration technique in 62 cases (54.4%), and the main instructor was the pediatrician. Sixty-eight (72%) of parents did not perform properly the inhalation technique and a positive association was found between patient age and the proper realization of the aerosol (r=0.21; P=0.03). Conclusion. Most parents perform incorrectly aerosol therapy with valved holding chamber and the child's age influences the inhalation technique.(AU)

Pharmacokinetics of tazobactam M1 metabolite after administration of piperacillin/tazobactam in subjects with renal impairment.

Tazobactam is a new derivative of penicillinic acid sulfone, which functions as an irreversible inhibitor of many beta-lactamases. The disposition of tazobactam M1 metabolite after intravenous (i.v.) infusion of 3 g of piperacillin/0.375 g of tazobactam was evaluated in 26 subjects with various degrees of renal impairment. Participants in the study were 18 subjects with creatinine clearances (ClCR) ranging from 7.4-41.8 mL/min, 4 subjects maintained on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), and 4 subjects undergoing chronic hemodialysis (HD). The pharmacokinetic parameters of piperacillin and tazobactam were evaluated and were similar to previous reports. Tazobactam M1 metabolite maximum plasma concentration increased as renal function declined. The terminal elimination half-life and area under the plasma concentration-time curve of the tazobactam M1 metabolite increased as renal function declined. The mean rate of recovery of the tazobactam M1 metabolite in hemodialysate during a 3- to 4.2-hour HD session 1 hour after the i.v. infusion of piperacillin/tazobactam was 25.3%. However, when HD was performed at 36-48 hours after the i.v. infusion, 57.6% of the tazobactam dose was recovered as M1 metabolite, suggesting further conversion of tazobactam to M1 metabolite. Peritoneal dialysis removed 15.8% (n = 2) of the tazobactam dose as the M1 metabolite. Using a dose of 3 g of piperacillin/0.375 g of tazobactam, the predicted maximum steady-state plasma concentrations of the tazobactam M1 metabolite are 14.6 micrograms/mL, 34.8 micrograms/mL, and 48.8 micrograms/mL for subjects with ClCR 20-40 mL/min (every 6 hour dosing), ClCR < 20 mL/min (every 8 hour dosing), and on CAPD (every 12 hour dosing), respectively.

Dose proportionality of bisoprolol enantiomers in humans after oral administration of the racemate.

Dose proportionality of racemic bisoprolol and the stereoselectivity of its enantiomers were studied after single oral dosing of 5 to 40 mg of bisoprolol hemifumarate in eight healthy male volunteers in an open-label, randomized, four-way cross-over trial. There were dose-proportional increases in mean peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) values for the racemate and the individual enantiomers. No statistically significant differences were detected between the mean half life (t 1/2), Cmax, and time to reach Cmax (tmax) of the R- and S-isomers at each of the four dose levels studied. These findings support dose proportionality and absence of stereoselective pharmacokinetics for bisoprolol in the dose range studied.

Randomized multicenter trial of cytosine arabinoside with mitoxantrone or daunorubicin in previously untreated adult patients with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL). Lederle Cooperative Group.

This phase III, randomized trial in previously untreated adults with ANLL compared mitoxantrone plus cytosine arabinoside with the CALGB "7 + 3" daunorubicin-based regimen. Two hundred evaluable patients (98 treated with the mitoxantrone-based regimen and 102 with the daunorubicin-based regimen) were included in the analysis of efficacy. The median age of the patients was 60 years. The induction regimen comprised cytosine arabinoside 100 mg/m2 by infusion daily for 7 days and mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 or daunorubicin 45 mg/m2 daily for days 1-3. If needed, a second induction course was administered: cytosine arabinoside for 5 days and mitoxantrone or daunorubicin for 2 days. Postremission therapy consisted of two consolidation courses, identical to the second induction course. Sixty-three percent (62 of 98) of patients treated with mitoxantrone achieved complete remission (CR), compared to 53% (54 of 102) treated with daunorubicin. The median time to CR was 35 days in patients treated with mitoxantrone and 43 days for those treated with daunorubicin. Eighty-nine percent (55 of 62) of patients treated with mitoxantrone who entered complete remission achieved CR following one induction course, compared to 68% (37 of 54) of patients treated with daunorubicin who entered CR. The median duration of CR was 240 days in patients treated with mitoxantrone and 198 days in those treated with daunorubicin; the median length of survival was 328 days in patients who received mitoxantrone and 247 days in those who received daunorubicin. The toxicity profiles in patients treated with either of the two regimens were comparable in incidence and in severity. Patients treated with mitoxantrone required fewer median platelet units and were treated with fewer median days of intravenous antibiotics, compared to those who received daunorubicin. Mitoxantrone in combination with cytosine arabinoside is effective in previously untreated ANLL. complete remissions occur more frequently after a single induction course of the mitoxantrone-based regimen, compared to the standard Cancer and Acute Leukemia Group B regimen. This should be explored in further trials.

Bioequivalency of oral suspension formulations of cefixime.

A study was performed in 24 healthy male subjects to establish that two suspension formulations of cefixime were bioequivalent to each other and to a reference oral solution. A single 400 mg oral dose of the drug was given in a randomized three-way crossover design as two suspensions (a research suspension (RS) used during clinical trials and a suspension intended for marketing (MS] and a reference oral solution (SOL). Each dose was separated from the other by a 3-day washout period. Mean peak serum concentrations (Cmax) were 4.67, 4.10, and 4.27 micrograms ml-1 after the MS, RS, and SOL, respectively. Although comparison (ANOVA) of the mean pharmacokinetic parameters for cefixime found significant differences (p less than 0.05) in Cmax, the time to Cmax, and area under the serum concentration time curve (AUC 0----infinity) values among the three formulations, the mean differences were less than 20 per cent. No significant differences (p greater than 0.05) were found in either the elimination half-life or renal clearance of unchanged drug. Overall, with a 98 per cent power to detect a 20 per cent difference in AUC0----infinity or urinary recovery values between the formulations tested, the results show that the MS was bioequivalent to the RS and that both suspensions were bioequivalent to the SOL.

Importance of oral dosing rate on the hemodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile on nilvadipine.

Nilvadipine was administered as an oral solution formulation to 12 normotensive subjects in a three-way randomized crossover study at a dose of 16 mg as three different dosing regimens: 1) as a single 16 mg dose, 2) as a 1.6 mg dose given hourly for 10 doses, and 3) as an initial dose of 4.8 mg, followed by 1.6 mg doses given every hour for seven additional doses. After each dose, clinical effects, hemodynamic changes and the pharmacokinetic profile of the drug were determined. The mean maximum changes in diastolic (DBP) and systolic (SBP) blood pressure and heart rate (HR) after dosing regimens 1, 2, and 3 were: -33, -13 and +46%; -17, -14 and +38%; and -24, -14 and +36%, respectively. There was a relationship between the changes in DBP and HR and plasma concentrations of nilvadipine only after dosing regimen 1. The effect-concentration relationships were fit to a modified Emax model. There was no relationship between the change in SBP and plasma concentration after any of the dosing regimens. While there were no significant differences in the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0----infinity) between dosing regimens 2 (38.7 ng.hr/mL) and 3 (42.1 ng.hr/mL) (P greater than 0.05), the mean AUC0----infinity after regimen 1 (76.3 ng.hr/mL) was significantly greater than after dosing regimens 2 or 3 (P less than 0.05). The mean maximal plasma concentrations (Cmax) were 31.6, 1.3 and 6.3 ng/mL after dosing regimens 1, 2 and 3, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of a sustained-release formulation of trihexyphenidyl in healthy volunteers.

Twenty-four male subjects were randomized to receive two oral dosage forms of trihexyphenidyl HCl (alpha-cyclohexyl-alpha-phenyl-1-piperidinepropanol HCl). The dosage regimens were (1) a 5-mg immediate release (IR) tablet given twice daily at time zero and 12 h later, and (2) two 5-mg sustained-release (SR) capsule formulations given daily. The number of adverse experiences following the SR formulation were approximately 50% of those for the IR formulation, the peak concentration (Cmax) after the SR formulation was significantly lower (p less than 0.05) than that after the first dose of the IR formulation, and the time to reach Cmax (tmax) was significantly longer after the SR formulation (p less than 0.05). The SR formulation maintained serum concentrations above 50, 60, and 70% of Cmax values for average time periods of 11.7, 9.4, and 5.9 h, respectively, compared with values of 1.8, 1.2, and 0.9 h after the IR formulation; the differences were all significant (p less than 0.05). The mean elimination half-life (t1/2) was similar (p greater than 0.05) after the SR (10.1 h) and IR (8.7 h) formulations. The statistical power of the study was 98.1% to detect a 20% difference in the area under the curve from time zero to time infinity (AUC0----infinity) between formulations. Although the AUC0----infinity after the SR formulation was statistically smaller (p less than 0.05) than after the IR tablet, the difference was less than 20%. Therefore, the SR formulation was bioequivalent to the IR tablet formulation of trihexyphenidyl.

Absolute bioavailability of cefixime in man.

In a four-way cross-over study, the absolute bioavailability of cefixime was determined in 16 healthy volunteers. Each subject received a single 200-mg dose as an intravenous (IV) and oral solution, and 200-mg and 400-mg capsule doses of the drug. Blood and urine samples were collected for 24 hours after each dose. Cefixime was well tolerated after IV and oral doses of the drug and no serious drug-related adverse effects were observed. The maximal serum concentration (Cmax) of cefixime following the 200-mg oral solution and 200-mg and 400-mg capsule doses were 3.22, 2.92, and 4.84 micrograms/mL, respectively. Mean area under the serum concentration time curves (AUC) following the IV, 200-mg oral solution, and 200-mg and 400-mg capsule doses were 47.0, 26.0, 23.6, and 39.4 micrograms.hr/mL, respectively. Mean elimination half-life values of the drug were comparable after oral and IV doses, ranging from 3.2 to 3.5 hours. Based on serum AUC values, the absolute bioavailability of cefixime was 52.3%, 47.9%, and 40.2% after the 200-mg oral solution, 200-mg capsule and 400-mg capsule doses, respectively. Respective ratios based on 24-hour urinary recovery data were 44.7%, 41.7%, and 40.5%. Therefore, the results show that the percent of cefixime adsorbed after 200-mg and 400-mg oral doses was similar.

Pharmacokinetics of leucovorin calcium after intravenous, intramuscular, and oral administration.

The pharmacokinetics of leucovorin was evaluated after intravenous, intramuscular, and oral administration in a randomized crossover study of 37 healthy men. A single 25-mg dose of leucovorin calcium was administered intravenously, intramuscularly, or orally to the subjects. Blood samples were obtained immediately before and at 13 time points up to 24 hours after the leucovorin dose. The three treatment phases were separated by one-week intervals. Bioavailability was assessed by measuring over 24 hours the blood concentrations of total folates, the parent compound 5-formyltetrahydrofolate, and the metabolite 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, using differential microbiologic assays with Lactobacillus casei and Streptococcus faecalis. Both intravenous and intramuscular administration produced rapid increases in serum concentrations of biologically active folates; these rises were sustained over time and were still detectable at 24 hours after drug administration. The bioavailability of intravenous and intramuscular doses was comparable based on area under the serum concentration-time curve, although for intramuscular administration, the peak concentration was lower and the time to peak concentration was longer. The initial rise in serum folate with intravenous and intramuscular dosing represented 5-formyltetrahydrofolate; this fell concomitantly with the appearance of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate. Oral leucovorin was 92% bioavailable compared with intravenous administration and produced a predictably different pattern of circulating folates, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate being the predominant form. Terminal elimination half-life, apparent volume of distribution, and clearance of total folate were not significantly different among the three treatments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Absorption kinetics of orally administered leucovorin calcium.

Oral dose proportionality and pharmacokinetics of leucovorin [(d,l)-5-formyltetrahydrofolate (5-formyl-THF)] were studied in 30 healthy male subjects. In a randomized cross-over design, 24 fasted subjects were given 4 of a series of 5 single test doses between 20 and 100 mg, at 1-week intervals, of 5-formyl-THF as an oral solution of leucovorin calcium. Six separate subjects received 200 mg iv and po in a 2-way crossover. Blood and urine samples were collected over 24 hours for differential microbiological folate assays using Lactobacillus casei and Streptococcus faecalis. Using L casei activity to measure total serum folates, the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to infinite time (AUC[0-infinity]) was calculated. Relative bioavailabilities were 78%, 62%, 49%, and 42% for the 40-, 60-, 80-, and 100-mg doses, respectively. Both the AUC and peak concentration (CPEAK) of total folates (consisting predominantly of the major metabolite, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-methyl-THF], displayed significant deviation from linearity consistent with a saturation of folate absorption. Absolute bioavailability of the 200-mg oral dose of leucovorin based on AUC was 31% compared with that of the iv dose (6,848 vs. 22,298 ng.hr/ml, respectively). Total clearance, terminal half-life, and apparent volume of distribution of total folate at the 200-mg dose were not significantly different between the two routes of administration. Eighty-three percent of the biologically active iv dose was recovered in the urine within 24 hours, 31% as 5-methyl-THF. Twenty percent of the same oral dose was excreted in 24 hours, 16% as 5-methyl-THF. In contrast to the nondose-proportionality observed in total serum folates, AUC of the small component of S faecalis activity, which appeared earlier than 5-methyl-THF, displayed linear kinetics, suggestive of a distinct mechanism of uptake. As dose increased, S faecalis activity increased in relative proportion to L casei, indicating that saturation of the enzymatic bioconversion to 5-methyl-THF may also be occurring. In light of the demonstrated nondose-proportionality of total folates with oral leucovorin in this dose range, consideration should be given to parenteral administration in regimens employing higher doses. Oral administration should be at a level consistent with the capacity for efficient folate uptake.