A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators for health behavior change in low-income men with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Low-income prostate cancer survivors, who typically have worse outcomes and greater all-cause mortality, often have poor health-promoting behaviors. Our objective was to assess perceived facilitators of and barriers to healthy behavior change by interviewing low-income men with prostate cancer who received no-cost treatment through a state-funded program. METHODS: Between September 2021 and April 2022, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 19 men (ages 60-75). Purposive sampling was utilized from participants of a cohort of men with prostate cancer from low-income backgrounds. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and then coded by the authors to generate salient themes via thematic analysis. RESULTS: We found internal characteristics and structural characteristics that functioned independently and in concert to promote and/or hinder healthy behavior change. Internal characteristics such as motivations (prostate cancer diagnosis, self-perceptions, support system, and preferences) and determination, defined as level of motivation, drove behavior actualization. Structural characteristics that influenced behavior change included resources (access to food and opportunities for exercise) and social support. CONCLUSIONS: These outcomes suggest that motivation and determination can serve as protective facilitators encouraging healthy behaviors despite structural barriers low-income prostate cancer survivors may face. However, motivations challenged by financial constraints were not sufficient to guide healthy behavior change. With this in mind, we recommend that interventions promoting healthy behavior change among this population should focus on identifying and strengthening internal assets such as motivations, self-perceptions, preferences, and support systems.

Relationship between pelvic sensations and lifetime exposure to receptive anal intercourse among people with prostates.

BACKGROUND: Despite the negative stigma on receptive anal intercourse (RAI), this behavior has a positive influence on individuals' sexual and relationship health. No large studies have previously looked at specific sensations experienced during RAI and how these sensations may change with experience. AIM: In this study we aimed to quantify commonly reported pelvic sensations during RAI and determine whether their presentation changes with increasing experience of RAI. METHODS: An internet survey was conducted on sensations felt during RAI among people with prostates from July 2022-January 2023. The survey content was developed based on a mixed-methods qualitative study and inquired about demographic and sexual histories as well as sensations (pleasure, pain, urinary, and bowel) experienced during RAI. We used descriptive statistics to describe demographic and sexual histories. All data were stratified by lifetime exposure to RAI. OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes assessed included the quantification of both the primary sensations experienced during RAI and the associated bother. RESULTS: In total, 975 participants completed the survey. The median age was 32 (range 18-78) years. The average age of first participation in RAI was 21 ± 6.6 years. Most respondents were having sex at least once a week (65%). Nine percent of respondents reported fewer than 10 experiences with RAI, 26% reported 11-50 RAI experiences, 32% reported 51-200 experiences, 16% reported 201-500 experiences, and 18% reported >500 experiences. As the number of experiences with RAI increased (from <10 to >500 exposures), the reported frequency of pleasurable sensation increased from 41% to 92% (P < .0001), whereas severe insertional pain and symptoms of bowel urgency decreased from 39% to 13% and from 21% to 6%, respectively (P < .0001). Urinary urgency sensation did not differ by lifetime RAI experience. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Lifetime RAI exposure can be readily assessed and correlates not only with pelvic sensation but also many other aspects of sexual health. These results imply that the etiology of dissatisfaction with pleasure or anodyspareunia during RAI may differ by lifetime RAI exposure. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This is the first study to our knowledge to assess pelvic sensations experienced during RAI among a large sample of individuals. This is a cross-sectional study, and we cannot conclude how pelvic sensations change over time among individuals. Internet-based participants may not be representative of clinical populations. CONCLUSION: Lifetime exposure to RAI is positively associated with pleasure and is negatively associated with pain and bowel urgency. Pelvic sensations experienced during RAI appear to be dependent on lifetime RAI exposure history regardless of age.

Measurement accuracy of 3-Dimensional mapping technologies versus standard goniometry for angle assessment.

BACKGROUND: A specific aspect of the hypospadias phenotype that may contribute to long-term outcomes is the presence of ventral penile curvature and the adequacy of its surgical correction. The current gold standard to assess this angle is intraoperative goniometry of an erect penis. 3-dimensional (3D) mapping technologies may overcome the limitations of these traditional methods through their combination of digital image and geometric replication to produce consistent 3D digital forms of a physical structure. The aim of this study is to evaluate the measurement accuracy and reliability of handheld 3D mapping technologies versus standard goniometry for angle assessment in a laboratory setting. METHODS: Blocks with specified angles (10-45°) were printed using a Zortrax M200 3D printer (±0.2% accuracy). Following the completion of standardized training, blinded participants measured each block angle using a baseline digit goniometer. Additionally, complete digital models of the blocks were created using 3D mapping technologies. Structured light scanning was completed using an Artec Space Spider and Artec Studio 13. Traditional photogrammetry was completed using a Canon Eos Rebel T5i DSLR camera and Agisoft Metashape Pro. Photogrammetry with a 3D camera was completed using the VECTRA H1 and VECTRA Analysis Module. All 3D models were imported into the software Autodesk Inventor in which automated angle measurements through the central plane were obtained. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the accuracy, precision and reliability of each modality using SAS 9.4 software. The reliability of goniometry and each mapping technology was evaluated using two-way random effect models with absolute agreement. RESULTS: Six 3D printed blocks were evaluated. 5 digital models per block were created using each of the 3 mapping technologies. Inter-rater reliability of goniometry was moderate (ICC 0.76, 95% CI 0.46, 0.92), whereas all mapping technologies demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability: structured light scanning (ICC 0.99; 95% CI 0.999, 0.999); traditional photogrammetry (0.99; 0.99, 0.99); 3D camera (0.99; 0.99, 0.99). Mean angle measurements and standard error for each angle and modality are provided in the table. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated excellent accuracy, precision and reliability of off-the-shelf, handheld 3D mapping technologies and moderate reliability for goniometry when applied to measurements of angulation in a laboratory setting. The described methods developed in the laboratory for optimization of angle analysis from 3D models are an important step toward reliable, reproducible phenotypic analysis of congenital genitourinary conditions in future intraoperative and database development applications.