Twenty-five years of experience with out-center hemodialysis.

UNLABELLED: Twenty-five years of experience with out-center hemodialysis. BACKGROUND: Out-center hemodialysis (HD) offers patients a better quality of life, a greater independence, and a better rehabilitation opportunity. A lower mortality than with other modalities of dialysis has been reported. In addition, in France the charges paid depend on the modality of dialysis, out-center HD being the less expensive, and savings are also accomplished through fewer patient transports, which are additionally reimbursed. We present a 25-year experience of out-center HD. METHODS: We retrospectively studied the clinical records of 471 patients treated between 1974 and 1997 in a single nonprofit organization operating regional home HD (H-HD) and facilities for self-care HD (SC-HD). Survival results were analyzed according to: (a) causes of end-stage renal disease, (b) age at the start of HD, (c) period of start of HD, (d) modality of HD (H-HD, SC-HD), and (e) a subgroup of 174 patients defined at risk because they were contraindicated for transplantation. RESULTS: The mean age at the start of HD increased from 31.2 +/- 9.7 (mean +/- SD) years in 1974 to 52.6 +/- 13.5 years in 1997. Causes of the end of treatment were: (a) transplantation (63%), (b) transfer (20%), and (c) death (17%). The overall survival was 90% at 5 years, 77% at 10 years, 62% at 15 years, and 45% at 20 years, and, for the group at risk, 78%, 62%, 46%, and 31%, respectively. Cox proportional hazard analyses showed that risk factors were older age, diabetes, and renal vascular diseases. CONCLUSION: If adequate choice is given, out-center HD offers a reliable and safe modality of dialysis with better survival results than survival in full-care in-center HD. In addition, out-center HD ensures a striking financial benefit as compared with the higher costs if the same patients were treated with full-care in-center HD. These modalities should be encouraged for all HD patients who are able to be treated by out-center modalities.

Peritoneal clearance of leptin in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Leptin is a 16-kd protein that increases energy expenditure and limits food intake. Serum leptin (S-leptin) is elevated in dialysis patients, and little data have been reported on leptin clearance (Cl) during dialysis. We analyzed the peritoneal dialysis (PD) Cl of leptin in 15 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients and compared the results to beta(2)-microglobulin (beta(2)-m), urea, and creatinine PD Cl. S-leptin was significantly elevated (Kruskal-Wallis, P < 0.005) in CAPD women (58.4 +/- 42.4 [SE] microg/L, n = 5) as compared with CAPD men (13.9 +/- 7.1, n = 10) and with healthy women (11.0 +/- 1.4, n = 13) and men (5.1 +/- 0. 9, n = 14). Correlations were found between percent of fat mass and S-leptin (P < 0.05); between S-leptin and the 24-hour PD leptin (P < 0.05); and between dialysate-to-plasma (D/P) beta(2)-m and D/P leptin (P < 0.01). PD leptin Cl (1.80 +/- 0.43 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) was higher than beta(2)-m Cl (1.22 +/- 0.31) (P < 0.01), but reduced as compared with urea Cl (8.84 +/- 1.20) (P < 0.005) and creatinine Cl (7.71 +/- 0.99) (P < 0.005). These results indicate that leptin is eliminated through the peritoneum membrane. However, peritoneal leptin clearance, as beta(2)-m, appears to be clearly restricted as compared with peritoneal transport of smaller molecules. Hence, leptin could use the same diffusion transport pathway as beta(2)-m. In addition, leptin, which has a higher molecular weight than beta(2)-m, was significantly more eliminated into the peritoneal dialysate. More studies are necessary to clarify whether this is an active leptin elimination process by peritoneal secretion or by a different restriction coefficient of diffusion through the peritoneum membrane.

Daily versus standard hemodialysis: one year experience.

The aim of this study was to compare clinical and biological results in 4 standard hemodialyzed patients originally treated by three 4-5 h sessions per week and converted within one year to daily hemodialysis sessions of 2-2.5 h each 6 times per week. The modalities and the total weekly dialysis times remained the same. With daily hemodialysis, the blood pressure and left ventricular mass index decreased significantly (p < 0.01). A significant decrease in the urea time averaged deviation (TAD) (p < 0.005) and increase in the Kt/V index (p < 0.05) were observed. A gain in dry weight was shown with a rise in caloric intake from 33+/-3.21 to 40.8+/-6.35 kcal/kg/day (p < 0.05), and the normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR) increased significantly (p < 0.0038). One patient who was receiving erythropoietin (EPO) for anemia could stop his treatment. No arteriovenous fistula complications were observed. Daily hemodialysis seems to be the method of choice to manage hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy in uremic patients. The increase of the urea TAD to a value closer to that of the healthy kidney due to the increase of the frequency of dialysis is probably the main explanation for clinical improvement.