Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Bioelectromagnetics ; 31(7): 546-55, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20683910

ABSTRACT

In the last few years, significant developments have taken place in the field of Wireless Local Area Networks (WLAN), and the popularity of portable devices supporting Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi) is continuously growing. At the same time, the number of Active Implanted Medical Devices (AIMD) being placed in patients is widely increasing and among them, cochlear implants (CI) are becoming a common aid. The goal of this study is to investigate the effect on the electromagnetic field distribution and the specific absorption rate (SAR) due to the presence of a CI in a head model during far-field exposure to Wi-Fi frequencies. The head model was obtained by image segmentation, the implant was modelled as a geometric structure, and the exposure sources were modelled as a uniform plane wave (power density = 10 W/m(2)) at 2.4, 5.2 and 5.8 GHz. Vertical and horizontal polarizations were simulated. Conditions with and without CI were compared. The findings of that are: (1) local differences in the field distribution close to the CI, comparing the head models with or without the CI; (2) higher field strength and point SAR value in the cochlear region very close to the CI; (3) negligible differences in the field strength and point SAR value in the cochlear region far from the CI; (4) negligible variations in the average SAR values in the cochlea and head due to the presence of the CI. The results of this study conclude that insertion of a CI brings moderate localized differences in the E, H and point SAR distribution when evaluated close to the electrode array in the cochlea, while negligible differences are found in the average SAR values both in the cochlea and head, independent of frequency and wave polarization.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Head/radiation effects , Models, Anatomic , Wireless Technology , Electrodes , Electromagnetic Fields/adverse effects , Humans , Radiation Dosage
2.
Radiat Res ; 172(2): 244-51, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19630529

ABSTRACT

Abstract The European project EMFnEAR was undertaken to assess potential changes in human auditory function after a short-term exposure to radiofrequency (RF) radiation produced by UMTS (Universal Mobile Telecommunication System) mobile phones. Participants were healthy young adults with no hearing or ear disorders. Auditory function was assessed immediately before and after exposure to radiofrequency radiation, and only the exposed ear was tested. Tests for the assessment of auditory function were hearing threshold level (HTL), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE), contralateral suppression of transiently evoked otoacoustic emission (CAS effect on TEOAE), and auditory evoked potentials (AEP). The exposure consisted of speech at a typical conversational level delivered via an earphone to one ear, plus genuine or sham RF-radiation exposure produced by a commercial phone controlled by a personal computer. Results from 134 participants did not show any consistent pattern of effects on the auditory system after a 20-min UMTS exposure at the maximum output of the phone with 69 mW/kg SAR in the cochlea region in a double blind comparison of genuine and sham exposure. An isolated effect on the hearing threshold at high frequencies was identified, but this was statistically nonsignificant after correction for multiple comparisons. It is concluded that UMTS short-term exposure at the maximum output of consumer mobile phones does not cause measurable immediate effects on the human auditory system.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception/physiology , Auditory Perception/radiation effects , Cell Phone , Environmental Exposure , Hearing/physiology , Hearing/radiation effects , Adolescent , Adult , Electromagnetic Fields , Europe , Female , Hearing Tests , Humans , Male , Radiation Dosage , Young Adult
3.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 124(5): 2984-94, 2008 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19045786

ABSTRACT

The latency of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions has been evaluated in a sample of 58 ears from 34 preterm neonates, to understand if the estimates of cochlear tuning based on the otoacoustic emission latency show signs of developmental changes. A previous study on the same otoacoustic emissions analyzed here [Tognola et al. (2005). "Cochlear maturation and otoacoustic emissions in preterm infants: A time-frequency approach," Hear. Res., 199, 71-80] reported indeed a significant change in the otoacoustic emission latency with postconception age. This last result, which would imply a significant decrease of tuning, was partially biased by the presence of spontaneous emissions. In this study, the same neonate data are reanalyzed using a novel time-frequency algorithm, less sensitive to spontaneous emissions. Asymmetry between right and left ears has been found, with the left ears showing no significant change, whereas in the right ears and in the 1.5-2.5 kHz frequency range only, a slow decrease of latency with postconception age (0.1-0.2 ms/week) was observed. The correspondent tuning estimates based on latency decrease by 0.4-0.5/week. Significant differences between neonate and adult latency were confirmed, which could be either cochlear or middle ear in nature. These findings are compared to previous studies on distortion product suppression tuning curves in preterm neonates.


Subject(s)
Cochlea/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Infant, Premature/physiology , Otoacoustic Emissions, Spontaneous/physiology , Reaction Time/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Audiometry, Evoked Response , Hair Cells, Auditory, Outer/physiology , Humans , Infant, Newborn
4.
Ann Ist Super Sanita ; 43(3): 241-7, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17938454

ABSTRACT

This paper reviews the most common sources of electromagnetic interference (EMI) with cochlear implants (CI). Particular attention will be given to the description of the mechanisms of electromagnetic interaction with CI; main disturbances caused to CI; relevant scientific investigations; and existing requirements and tests for electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) immunity applicable to CI.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Electromagnetic Fields , Adult , Cell Phone , Child , Contraindications , Cranial Irradiation , Electrocoagulation/instrumentation , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure , Equipment and Supplies/standards , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Occupational Exposure , Static Electricity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...