Curcumin and enalapril ameliorate renal failure by antagonizing inflammation in 5/6 nephrectomized rats: role of phospholipase and cyclooxygenase.

Previously, we showed that curcumin prevents chronic kidney disease (CKD) development in ⅚ nephrectomized (Nx) rats when given within 1 wk after Nx (Ghosh SS, Massey HD, Krieg R, Fazelbhoy ZA, Ghosh S, Sica DA, Fakhry I, Gehr TW. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 296: F1146-F1157, 2009). To better mimic the scenario for renal disease in humans, we began curcumin and enalapril therapy when proteinuria was already established. We hypothesized that curcumin, by blocking the inflammatory mediators TNF-α and IL-1ß, could also reduce cyclooxygenase (COX) and phospholipase expression in the kidney. Nx animals were divided into untreated Nx, curcumin-treated, and enalapril-treated groups. Curcumin (75 mg/kg) and enalapril (10 mg/kg) were administered for 10 wk. Renal dysfunction in the Nx group, as evidenced by elevated blood urea nitrogen, plasma creatinine, proteinuria, segmental sclerosis, and tubular dilatation, was comparably reduced by curcumin and enalapril, with only enalapril significantly lowering blood pressure. Compared with controls, Nx animals had higher plasma/kidney TNF-α and IL-1ß, which were reduced by curcumin and enalapril treatment. Nx animals had significantly elevated kidney levels of cytosolic PLA(2), calcium-independent intracellular PLA(2), COX 1, and COX 2, which were comparably reduced by curcumin and enalapril. Studies in mesangial cells and macrophages were carried out to establish that the in vivo increase in PLA(2) and COX were mediated by TNF-α and IL-1ß and that curcumin, by antagonizing the cytokines, could significantly reduce both PLA(2) and COX. We conclude that curcumin ameliorates CKD by blocking inflammatory signals even if it is given at a later stage of the disease.

Curcumin ameliorates renal failure in 5/6 nephrectomized rats: role of inflammation.

TNF-alpha and NF-kappaB play important roles in the development of inflammation in chronic renal failure (CRF). In hepatic cells, curcumin is shown to antagonize TNF-alpha-elicited NF-kappaB activation. In this study, we hypothesized that if inflammation plays a key role in renal failure then curcumin should be effective in improving CRF. The effectiveness of curcumin was compared with enalapril, a compound known to ameliorate human and experimental CRF. Investigation was conducted in Sprague-Dawley rats where CRF was induced by 5/6 nephrectomy (Nx). The Nx animals were divided into untreated (Nx), curcumin-treated (curcumin), and enalapril-treated (enalapril) groups. Sham-operated animals served as a control. Renal dysfunction in the Nx group, as evidenced by elevated blood urea nitrogen, plasma creatinine, proteinuria, segmental sclerosis, and tubular dilatation, was significantly reduced by curcumin and enalapril treatment. However, only enalapril significantly improved blood pressure. Compared with the control, the Nx animals had significantly higher plasma and kidney TNF-alpha, which was associated with NF-kappaB activation and macrophage infiltration in the kidney. These changes were effectively antagonized by curcumin and enalapril treatment. The decline in the anti-inflammatory peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) seen in Nx animals was also counteracted by curcumin and enalapril. Studies in mesangial cells were carried out to further establish that the anti-inflammatory effect of curcumin in vivo was mediated essentially by antagonizing TNF-alpha. Curcumin dose dependently antagonized the TNF-alpha-mediated decrease in PPARgamma and blocked transactivation of NF-kappaB and repression of PPARgamma, indicating that the anti-inflamatory property of curcumin may be responsible for alleviating CRF in Nx animals.

Novel combinations in the treatment of hypertension.

Not uncommonly the effective treatment of hypertension requires multi-drug therapy. Multi-drug combinations that dominate clinical practice typically include a thiazide-type diuretic together with either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, or an angiotensin-receptor blocker, or a beta-blocker. On the other hand, there are several medication choices that provide incremental blood pressure reduction but all too often go under-appreciated as to their effectiveness. Such drug combinations include within class switching of diuretics, combining a thiazide-type diuretic with a calcium-channel blocker, utilizing 2 calcium-channel blockers from different classes, giving an ACE inhibitor together with an angiotensin-receptor blocker, adding an aldosterone receptor antagonist to any of several other drug classes, as well as adding nitrate therapy to any of several other drug classes. Such novel pharmacologic approaches offer useful options for treatment in the otherwise difficult to control hypertensive patient.

Eplerenone: a new aldosterone receptor antagonist--are the FDAs restrictions appropriate?

Eplerenone is a new aldosterone receptor antagonist that will be used in the treatment of hypertension. Like spironolactone, it is a compound that can be associated with the development of hyperkalemia. Therefore, the same prescription considerations that are applied to spironolactone should be directed to its use. Unfortunately, the label for eplerenone will place more stringent restrictions on its use than is the case for spironolactone. The basis for the multiple contraindications to the use of eplerenone is primarily that of concern for the development of hyperkalemia. This may occur with eplerenone, as has been the case with spironolactone. The presumption in the prescribing information that certain patient subsets, such as diabetics with microalbuminuria and/or patients with mild renal failure, would be highly prone to developing clinically relevant hyperkalemia with eplerenone is not, however, grounded in fact. The favorable experience with spironolactone is important. It should provide us with the landmarks for advancing knowledge on the role of newer aldosterone receptor antagonists in disease state management and one would think, help in establishing criteria for the safe use of new compounds. New compounds in a drug class typically provide advantages over earlier entries into a drug class but not if regressive labeling has occurred. Time and additional clinical experience with eplerenone will establish its safety profile and determine if the original label for this compound was correct.

Importance of potassium in cardiovascular disease.

The pivotal role of potassium (K+) in cardiovascular disease and the importance of preserving potassium balance have become clinical hot points, particularly as relates to new and emerging cardioprotective and renoprotective therapies that promote potassium retention. Although clinicians may be aware of the critical nature of this relationship, quite frequently there is some uncertainty as to the best way to monitor potassium levels in the face of a host of pathologic states and/or accompanying drug therapies that affect serum levels and/or total body potassium balance. Moreover, guidelines for monitoring of serum potassium levels are at best tentative and oftentimes are translated according to the level of concern of the respective physician. To address these uncertainties, an expert group was convened that included representatives from multiple disciplines. They attempted to reach consensus on the importance of K+ in hypertension, stroke, and arrhythmias as well as practical issues on maintaining K+ balance and avoiding K+ depletion. Because of the complexity of this topic, issues of hyperkalemia will be addressed in a forthcoming manuscript.

Premature termination of clinical trials--lessons learned.

Controlled clinical trials in cardiovascular disease are the cornerstone for therapeutic advances in this field of medicine. Since the introduction of the concept of controlled clinical trials there has been substantial progress in the design, conduct, and analysis of such studies. A growing awareness of ethical issues emerging from such trials has heightened public awareness, increased investigator scrutiny, and reinforced the need for interim data analysis. A benefit of such interim analyses is that either an entire clinical trial or a specific treatment limb can be stopped if the observed findings argue for premature termination. For example, highly positive findings, as were noted in the HOPE Study (Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation), led to its being stopped after 4.5 years of treatment, which was 1 year early. Alternatively, the doxazosin treatment limb of the ALLHAT (Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial) and the amlodipine treatment limb of AASK (African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension) were stopped early because of negative findings with each respectively. Finally, economic considerations can enter into the decision to close a study early as was the case in the CONVINCE (Controlled Onset Verapamil Investigation of Cardiovascular End Points) trial. Most such decisions rely heavily on information obtained from independent data and safety monitoring boards. Such boards ensure patient safety by providing an unbiased ongoing review of data, which would otherwise be unavailable until a study's completion. Early termination of a clinical trial can have important clinical implications and, in particular, can redirect patterns of clinical practice.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in combination: theory and practice.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers are commonly used to treat hypertension and/or a range of progressive end-organ diseases. The success of each of these drug classes in disease-state management is without dispute, and has led to speculation that given together the observed response would improve upon that observed with a member of each drug class individually given. Few studies are available, however, which carefully address the effect(s) of the combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin receptor blocker. Review of available studies would seem not to strongly support combination therapy with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and an angiotensin receptor blocker as preferred therapy in the broad base of general hypertensive patients with or without end-organ disease. Additional clarifying studies are needed to determine if specific patient subsets exist that might benefit from such combination therapy.

Dosage considerations with perindopril for systemic hypertension.

Perindopril erbumine is a once-daily angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor that effectively lowers systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Converted from the prodrug ester perindopril, the active diacid perindoprilat is distributed rapidly and extensively, primarily to tissues with high ACE activity. Its ability to lower BP is comparable to or better than that of other antihypertensive agents, both of its own class and other classes, and its trough-peak ratio is consistently between 75% and 100%, translating into 24 hours of true efficacy per dose. First-dose hypotension caused by an initial acute BP depression occurs less frequently with perindopril than with other ACE inhibitors, an advantage in volume-contracted patients and those whose BP is angiotensin II dependent, such as patients with congestive heart failure. A missed-dose study showed that most of the antihypertensive effect of perindopril remains for 24 to 48 hours after dosing, a characteristic that confers protection to patients who miss a dose. Perindopril improves the distensibility and compliance of large and small arteries, which are compromised in hypertension, and can effect vascular remodeling by a mechanism independent of BP lowering. The clinical implications of these effects are being investigated in large trials. Perindopril is well tolerated in the elderly, and combination therapy with a diuretic was shown to yield significant additional BP reduction. Perindoprilat is cleared renally; dosage should be adjusted in patients with renal impairment.

Current concepts of pharmacotherapy in hypertension: combination calcium channel blocker therapy in the treatment of hypertension.

Effective control of blood pressure is usually achieved only with the use of two or more antihypertensive medications. The treatment options for hypertension are numerous, and the number of possible combinations large. The selection of a specific combination drug regimen has often been linked to the perceived need for diuretic therapy as first- or second-step therapy; thus, the popularity of such drug combinations as an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor/diuretic, an angiotensin-receptor blocker/diuretic, or a beta blocker/diuretic. Rational alternatives exist, including an ACE inhibitor/calcium channel blocker (CCB) or a dihydropyridine CCB/b blocker combination. Traditionally, recommendations have advised against the use of combination therapy with two drugs from the same therapeutic class. However, because of the different binding and pharmacologic characteristics of CCBs, a rationale exists for combining different agents in this class in the management of hypertension and/or symptomatic coronary artery disease. In the treatment of either hypertension or angina, combination CCB therapy can prove uniquely successful.

The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: are their benefits a class effect or do individual agents differ?

The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study was a landmark study employing the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril in a patient population pre-destined for vascular events. This study found that a 10 mg dose of ramipril in comparison with placebo reduced the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and death from cardiovascular causes by 22%. This improvement in outcome was viewed as a direct consequence of ramipril, although the fact that blood pressure was reduced with ramipril has cast some considerable doubt on this supposition. Whether the observed findings in this study are a 'class effect' for all angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is unclear. To its credit, ramipril is the first angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor shown to prevent ischemic events in high-risk patients without discernible left ventricular dysfunction. Other similar trials are underway, which are studying similar populations to those included in this landmark study and should resolve the question of whether the cardioprotective effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are a 'class effect'.

The African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK): new findings.

In September, 2000, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health called an early halt to the amlodipine arm of the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK) trial after careful deliberation by an independent data and safety monitoring board. An interim analysis of the AASK at 3 years revealed a renoprotective effect of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril as compared to the dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (DHP-CCB) amlodipine in patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency. This differential effect was independent of the blood pressure (BP) levels reached and was evident in proteinuric patients and suggestive in patients with baseline proteinuria < 300 mg/d, but was not conclusive. The AASK trial data suggest that DHP-CCBs should be used cautiously in the presence of mild to moderate renal insufficiency. Judgment should be reserved for the use of other CCBs, such as verapamil or diltiazem, since these are fundamentally different CCBs with the potential for a different impact on hypertensive nephrosclerosis. The blinded observation period for AASK will be completed at the end of September, 2001, at which time additional, clinically useful information is expected to become available. (c)2001 Le Jacq Communications, Inc.

Pharmacology and clinical efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers.

The treatment of hypertension has become increasingly refined during the past decade. Although a variety of antihypertensive medication classes exist, drugs that interrupt the renin-angiotensin axis have gained a favored position in the treatment of hypertension and its attendant end-organ complications. In this regard, two drug classes, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, are most commonly used. Angiotensin receptor blockers have proven highly effective in the management of hypertension. This class is fairly heterogeneous with individual class members having somewhat distinctive pharmacologic properties. Eprosartan is a recent entry into this class. This compound compares favorably to others in this class relative to blood pressure reduction. In addition, preliminary studies indicate that this compound may uniquely interrupt the sympathetic nervous system and thereby preferentially reduce systolic blood pressure.

Direct vasodilators and their role in hypertension management: minoxidil.

Minoxidil is a direct vasodilator that has been in use for over two decades. It is used primarily to reduce blood pressure in hypertensives who have been poorly controlled on various multidrug regimens. Although minoxidil is extremely effective, its usefulness is limited by its tendency to increase the pulse rate and to trigger salt and water retention. The latter may be incapacitating in some patients. Therefore, minoxidil is typically administered with both a diuretic and an agent that can control the pulse rate, such as a beta blocker. Minoxidil has several other side effects that may limit its use, including hypertrichosis, aggravation of myocardial ischemia and/or left ventricular hypertrophy, and (infrequently) pericardial effusions. If a patient's hypertensive pattern is sufficiently severe to warrant contemplation of minoxidil therapy, referring the patient to a hypertension specialist should be strongly considered. (c) 2001 by LeJacq Communications, Inc.

Current concepts of pharmacotherapy in hypertension--ophthalmically administered beta blockers and their cardiopulmonary effects.

Early clinical studies revealed that timolol and other topical beta blockers were effective in reducing intra-ocular pressure, without the side effects associated with other antiglaucoma agents. However, because persons with cardiovascular or respiratory diseases were generally excluded from many of these early studies, the risk of serious cardiovascular and respiratory side effects was seriously underestimated. Once these drugs were made available to the general population, reports of systemic side effects began to proliferate. Very quickly, adverse effects from topical beta blockade became "old news." Despite this recognition, many treating physicians remained unaware of the potential for systemic beta blockade from topically applied beta blockers. A significant portion of a topically administered dose of a beta blocker can be absorbed and thereby affect systemic beta blockade. Sensitivity to systemic beta blockade can be quite dramatic in certain highly susceptible patients, particularly those with either cardiac or pulmonary abnormalities. Careful review of patients' medications will generally lessen, but not completely eliminate, the risk of undesired complications attributable to topical beta blockade.

Pharmacotherapy in congestive heart failure: Hyperkalemia in congestive heart failure.

Hyperkalemia is not an uncommon occurrence in the congestive heart failure patient, particularly when renal failure coexists. Hyperkalemia in CHF is typically medication-related. Its occurrence is inevitably linked to the simultaneous ingestion of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers, and more recently, aldosterone receptor antagonists, such as spironolactone. The most devastating consequence of hyperkalemia is its cardiotoxicity that can be fairly insidious in its rate of development. The therapy of hyperkalemia in congestive heart failure can involve both acute and semiacute management phases. Acute hyperkalemia management includes measures that block the adverse membrane effects of hyperkalemia, such as intravenous calcium administration, and efforts to shift potassium intracellularly, such as occurs with intravenous bicarbonate and/or inhaled beta-agonists. Semiacute management of hyperkalemia includes measures to increase urinary potassium excretion and administration of binding resins, such as Kayexalate®. Prevention is the cornerstone of hyperkalemia management in the heart failure patient and requires that careful attention be directed to both identifying exogenous sources of potassium and pinpointing the maximum tolerable dose of either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin-receptor blocker. (c)2001 by CHF, Inc.

Pharmacotherapy in congestive heart failure: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in congestive heart failure: do they differ in their renal effects in man?

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are used in the management of a wide range of cardiovascular conditions, including congestive heart failure (CHF). Although the experimental evidence in support of their use in CHF is incontrovertible, their pattern of usage has failed to keep pace with the research findings. One factor that has fueled the hesitancy to use ACE inhibitors in CHF has been the concern that renal function might worsen upon their receipt. Although the glomerular filtration rate may decline when ACE inhibitor or angiotension receptor blocker therapy is started in CHF, in most cases it is not a reason to discontinue therapy other than temporarily. Although ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers may differ theoretically in their renal effects, published information to date has not shown such a difference. (c)2001 by CHF, Inc.

Pharmacotherapy in congestive heart failure: angiotensin II and thirst: therapeutic considerations.

Angiotensin II is the effector peptide of the renin-angiotensin system and is involved in a wide range of physiologic functions that relate to volume control. In this regard, angiotensin II maintains and regulates salt and water balance, is critically involved in cardiovascular function, and governs thirst. When present in excess, angiotensin II can pathologically influence each of these functions. The role of angiotensin II in controlling sodium balance, in both renal insufficiency states and congestive heart failure, is clearly recognized. Alternatively, it is poorly appreciated that angiotensin II plays an important role in both normal and pathologic thirst states. The latter is a potential problem in both end-stage renal disease and congestive heart failure. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor antagonists (AT1-RAs) have both been shown to reduce abnormal thirst drive. Whether an ACE inhibitor or an AT1-RA lessens thirst drive to any significant degree relates to its capacity to penetrate the blood-brain barrier. Head-to-head comparisons of ACE inhibitors and AT1-RAs, as to their effect on thirst drive, have not been undertaken in a systematic fashion; thus, until otherwise established, the effect of these compounds on thirst should be viewed as a class effect, albeit one that is likely to be dose-dependent. (c)2001 CHF, Inc.

Gender and age effects on the ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate responses to antihypertensive therapy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess potential differences in the 24-h antihypertensive response to treatment with the controlled-onset, extended-release (COER) calcium antagonist, verapamil in men versus women and older versus younger patients with hypertension. METHODS: Meta-analyses were performed of three prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with COER-verapamil in patients with mid-stage I to stage III essential hypertension. The trials were conducted at medical clinics in the US and Canada in patients with a mean office diastolic blood pressure (BP) of 95 to 115 mm Hg on 2 consecutive weeks and a mean daytime diastolic BP >90 mm Hg. Patients were randomized to treatment with 180 to 540 mg/day of COER-verapamil (N = 273) or placebo (N = 125). Changes from baseline in ambulatory BP and heart rate after COER-verapamil were compared in men versus women and in older versus younger patients. RESULTS: Treatment with COER-verapamil caused significant reductions in 24-h and early-morning systolic and diastolic BP in all of the subpopulations as compared with placebo (P < .001). COER-verapamil induced a greater reduction in both 24-h systolic (-15.1 v -10.0 mm Hg; P < .001) and diastolic (-10.4 v -8.2 mm Hg; P = .003) BP in women compared with men. Older patients showed a greater mean reduction in 24-h diastolic BP (-10.2 v -8.2 mm Hg; P < .05) and heart rate (-5.7 v -4.4 beats/min; P < .05) compared with younger patients. Side effects were similar in all of the COER-verapamil treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both gender and age were significant determinants of the response to COER-verapamil. The antihypertensive effect of verapamil is greater in women than in men and in older patients compared with younger patients.