Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Occup Health ; 63(1): e12296, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34851000

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Following an earthquake that occurred in middle Italy in 2009, the involved territory hosted in 10 years thousands of construction sites. The aim of this study is to assess inhalable, respirable, and respirable crystalline silica exposure of the construction workers involved in the rebuilding activities. METHODS: Six construction companies joined the study and hosted the air sampling activities. We identified four work tasks: bricklayer and similar; scaffolder and carpenter; manual demolition; other tasks. We reported 8-h time-weighted concentrations. RESULTS: The "All tasks" geometric mean concentration of inhalable dust was 4.73 mg/m3 and the higher, TLV exceeding exposure was observed for "Manual demolition workers" (13.92 mg/m3 , GM). The "All tasks" geometric mean concentration of respirable dust was 0.25 mg/m3 and no TLV-exceeding exposure (geometric mean values) was observed among the work-related groups. About the respirable crystalline silica dust exposure, the "All tasks" average concentration was 0.004 mg/m3 . No TLV-exceeding exposure was observed among the whole data sample. CONCLUSIONS: The comparison of the results shows that manual demolition workers are exposed to high levels of inhalable dust, exceeding the TLV-TWA (Threshold Limit Values-Time Weighted Average) limit of 10 mg/m3 . About the respirable dust concentration, none of the analyzed work task dust concentrations exceeded the TLV-TWA limit of 3 mg/m3 (geometric mean values). Measurements of respirable crystalline silica dust have shown levels below the threshold limit value of 0.025 mg/m3 . Our findings overall match with the available scientific data.


Subject(s)
Construction Industry , Dust , Earthquakes , Occupational Exposure , Cities , Humans , Italy , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data
2.
Work ; 41 Suppl 1: 2966-70, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22317171

ABSTRACT

Psychosocial discomfort may amplify job-related risk factors. The aim of this study is to evaluate job stress in a high fashion clothing company with upper limb biomechanical overload due to repetitive and forceful manual activities. Biomechanical risk was analyzed and in part reduced using the OCRA Check list. A total of 518 workers (433 females and 85 males) were investigated to determine anxiety (by STAI 1 and 2), occupational stress (using the Italian version of the Karasek Job Content Questionnaire) and perception of symptoms. Final biomechanical assessment did not reveal high risk jobs, except for cutting. Although the perception of anxiety and job insecurity was within the normal range, all the workers showed a high level of job strain (correlated with the perception of symptoms) due, probably, to very low decision latitude. It was suggested that job strain may increase the perception of symptoms. Moreover, the result of this study indicates that musculoskeletal overload has to be further analyzed since its low level is not in agreement with the level of discomfort due to the repetitive tasks.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/epidemiology , Clothing , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Occupations , Risk Factors , Upper Extremity , Young Adult
3.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 85(5): 527-35, 2012 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21947343

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To study job stress and upper limb biomechanical overload due to repetitive and forceful manual activities in a factory producing high fashion clothing. METHODS: A total of 518 workers (433 women and 85 men) were investigated to determine anxiety, occupational stress (using the Italian version of the Karasek Job Content Questionnaire) and perception of symptoms (using the Italian version of the Somatization scale of Symptom Checklist SCL-90). Biomechanical overload was analyzed using the OCRA Check list. RESULTS: Biomechanical assessment did not reveal high-risk jobs, except for cutting. Although the perception of anxiety and job insecurity was within the normal range, all the workers showed a high level of job strain (correlated with the perception of symptoms) due to very low decision latitude. CONCLUSION: Occupational stress resulted partially in line with biomechanical risk factors; however, the perception of low decision latitude seems to play a major role in determining job strain. Interactions between physical and psychological factors cannot be demonstrated. Anyway, simultaneous long-term monitoring of occupational stress features and biomechanical overload could guide workplace interventions aimed at reducing the risk of adverse health effects.


Subject(s)
Clothing , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/psychology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Upper Extremity , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Checklist , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Stress, Psychological/physiopathology , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...