Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 13(7): e0200498, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30040852

ABSTRACT

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a high burden and significant cause of healthcare-acquired infectious diarrhea in the United States (US). Timely and accurate diagnosis of CDI enables the rapid initiation of antibiotic therapy and infection control policies to minimize disease transmission. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays have become a preferred modality for diagnosing CDI in the US. The cobas Liat Cdiff PCR test is a novel assay that can be performed on-demand for hospital-based testing with a rapid 20-minute turnaround time from specimen collection to result reporting. We compared the clinical performance of the cobas Liat Cdiff test to the previously introduced Xpert C. difficile/Epi test; both tests are FDA-cleared PCR assays that detect the toxin B (tcdB) gene of C. difficile. Prospectively collected and remnant stool specimens from 310 patients with suspected CDI were obtained for analysis. The cobas Liat Cdiff and Xpert PCR tests showed an overall percent agreement of 97.4% (302/310; 95% CI: 95.0-98.9). Low bacterial burdens of toxigenic C. difficile, indicated by significantly delayed PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values, explained most of the discordance. Positive and negative percent agreement of the cobas Liat Cdiff test compared to the Xpert PCR test were 94.5% (52/55) and 98.0% (250/255), respectively. The clinical performance of the cobas Liat Cdiff test, combined with its simplicity of use and rapid result reporting, provides a reliable option for clinical laboratory use.


Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Diagnostic Tests, Routine , Feces/microbiology , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Toxins/genetics , Clostridioides difficile/genetics , Enterotoxins/genetics , Humans , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
J Clin Virol ; 94: 86-90, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28772170

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Accurate detection of influenza requires diagnostic testing; however, methods such as RADTs and central laboratory-based tests are limited by low sensitivity and time constraints, respectively. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performances of the cobas® Liat® Influenza A/B and Alere™ i Influenza A&B point-of-care (POC) assays for detecting influenza A and B viruses using fresh nasopharyngeal specimens with the GenMark Dx® Respiratory Viral Panel as the reference method, a FDA cleared IVD PCR test. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 87 samples collected in viral transport medium from adults ≥18 years of age were re-tested on both POC assays (based on the reference PCR method, 29 were influenza A and 18 were influenza B virus positive). RESULTS: The overall sensitivity and specificity of the cobas Influenza A/B for the detection of influenza A and B relative to reference PCR was 97.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.9%, 99.6%) and 97.5% (95% CI: 87.1%, 99.6%), respectively, while the sensitivity of the Alere i Influenza A&B assay relative to the reference PCR method was 63.8% (95% CI: 49.5%, 76.0%) and the specificity was 97.5% (95% CI: 87.1%, 99.6%). The individual sensitivities and specificities of the cobas Influenza A/B assay for influenza A alone and influenza B alone were comparable to those of the reference PCR method (influenza A: sensitivity of 100% [95% CI: 88.3%, 100.0%] and specificity of 98.3% [95% CI: 90.9%, 99.7%]; influenza B: sensitivity of 94.4% [95% CI: 74.2%, 99.0%] and specificity of 100% [95% CI: 94.7%, 100.0%]). For the Alere i Influenza A&B assay, the individual specificities for influenza A and B were comparable to those of the reference PCR method (98.3% [95% CI: 90.9%, 99.7%] and 97.1% [95% CI: 90.0%, 99.2%], respectively), while the individual sensitivities were low relative to reference PCR (55.2% [95% CI: 37.5%, 71.6%] and 72.2% [95% CI: 49.1%, 87.5%], respectively). CONCLUSION: The cobas Influenza A/B assay demonstrated performance equivalent to laboratory-based PCR, and could replace rapid antigen tests.


Subject(s)
Influenza A virus/genetics , Influenza B virus/genetics , Influenza, Human , Nasopharynx/virology , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Humans , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Influenza, Human/virology , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Point-of-Care Systems , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
J Med Virol ; 89(8): 1382-1386, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28213975

ABSTRACT

Rapid diagnosis of influenza A and B is important for direct treatment decisions in patient care and for the reduction of in-hospital transmissions. The new real-time PCR based molecular point-of-care (POC) assay, the cobas® Influenza A/B test on the cobas® Liat® System (cobas® Liat® Influenza A/B assay), generated a PCR result in less than 20 min, was evaluated for the detection of influenza A and B. One hundred twenty-one retrospectively collected respiratory specimens, previously analyzed with a routine influenza A/B test (Diagenode) were tested using the cobas® Liat® Influenza A/B assay. The cobas® Liat® Influenza A/B assay allows influenza A and B testing by RT-PCR within 20 min. This assay detected influenza A in 51 of 56 samples positive by the Diagenode test. The five discrepant results were retested with the Cepheid Influenza A/B test, confirming two positive cases. All 30 influenza B Diagenode positive samples were found positive by the cobas® Liat® Influenza A/B assay. Control samples (viral negative and non-influenza pathogens) were all negative by the cobas® Liat® Influenza A/B assay. The cobas® Liat® Influenza A/B assay showed a sensitivity for influenza A/B of 96% and 100%, respectively, and 100% specificity for both targets. The cobas® Liat® Influenza A/B assay is a useful tool for accurate, rapid, and sensitive detection of influenza A and B, offering timely and personalized patient management and infection control when implemented at the point-of-care.


Subject(s)
Influenza A virus/isolation & purification , Influenza B virus/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Point-of-Care Systems , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Humans , Influenza, Human/virology , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...