Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (Mylotarg) monotherapy for relapsed AML after hematopoietic stem cell transplant: efficacy and incidence of hepatic veno-occlusive disease.

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) (Mylotarg, CMA-676) is a novel chemotherapeutic agent consisting of an anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody linked to calicheamicin, and is associated with a 30% response rate in patients with CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first relapse. GO therapy has a 20% incidence of grade 3 or 4 hepatotoxicity, and has recently been associated with hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD). The efficacy and toxicity of GO in patients with AML who have relapsed after hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is unknown, as this population was largely excluded from phase II studies. We reviewed the outcomes of eight consecutive patients with AML who received GO following relapse after HSCT. Two (25%) had responses to GO. One patient, who had had two previous HSCT and prior hyperbilirubinemia, developed severe VOD and died 14 days after GO therapy. The other seven patients did not meet diagnostic criteria for VOD. We conclude that GO can be safe and effective in patients who relapse following HSCT, but that caution is warranted in patients with multiple risk factors for VOD.

Determinants of postembolization syndrome after hepatic chemoembolization.

PURPOSE: Postembolization syndrome (PES) occurs in the majority of patients undergoing hepatic chemoembolization, and is the major reason for hospitalization after the procedure. The ability to identify which groups of patients are at increased or decreased risk of PES would be useful to better counsel patients, to minimize toxicity, and to plan inpatient versus outpatient therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy hepatic chemoembolization procedures were performed in 29 patients using cytotoxic drugs mixed with Ethiodol and polyvinyl alcohol. The following procedural variables were retrospectively assessed and evaluated for association with PES and length of postprocedural hospitalization: gallbladder embolization, lobe embolized, percentage liver volume embolized, percentage embolized volume occupied by tumor, previous embolization of the same territory, and dose of chemoembolic emulsion. Logistic regression was used to quantify the relative effect of each procedural variable. RESULTS: Gallbladder embolization and dose administered were associated with an increased risk of PES and an extended hospitalization, with odds ratios of 2.8 and 3.0, and 3.0 and 4.6, respectively. Previous embolization was associated with a decreased risk of both PES and extended hospitalization, with odds ratios of 0.5 and 0.4, respectively. There was a statistical trend toward significance for gallbladder embolization (P = .06), dose administered (P = .07), and previous embolization (P = .14). CONCLUSION: Clinically relevant predictors of the severity of PES and length of postprocedural hospitalization may exist. Avoiding embolization of the gallbladder reduces the risk of PES. Re-embolization of previously treated vessels is associated with decreased toxicity and may assist in selecting patients for treatment on an outpatient basis, especially when a reduced dose is required.

Phase I trial of TALL-104 cells in patients with refractory metastatic breast cancer.

The human cytotoxic T-cell line TALL-104 displays antitumor effects in animals with implanted and spontaneous malignancies. A Phase I trial was conducted to determine toxicity of TALL-104 cell therapy in women with metastatic refractory breast cancer. Fifteen patients with metastatic infiltrating ductal (n = 12), lobular (n = 2), or medullary (n = 1) carcinoma received escalating doses of lethally irradiated TALL-104 cells (three patients/group received 10(6), 3 x 10(6), 10(7), 3 x 10(7), and 10(8) cells/kg) for 5 consecutive days (induction course). Patients without progressive disease received monthly maintenance 2-day infusions at the same dose level. Mild grade I/II toxicity developed in 11 patients regardless of cell dose. One grade IV toxicity consequent to hepatic tumor necrosis occurred in a patient given 10(8) cells/kg, 3 weeks after the induction course. Nine patients progressed within 1 month from induction, and five patients had stable disease for 2-6 months. One patient (at 3 x 10(7)/kg) had improvement of liver metastases and ascites, and a second patient (at 10(6)/kg) experienced a dramatic relief in bone pain. Increases in blood natural killer cell activity and levels of IFN-gamma, interleukin-10, and activation markers (soluble interleukin-2 receptor and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1) were often seen. Only one patient developed anti-HLA class I antibody responses against TALL-104 cells; specific CTL activity developed in three patients during induction and in four patients during the maintenance boosts. In conclusion, TALL-104 cells were well tolerated by patients with metastatic breast cancer at the doses and regimen tested. The clinical responses observed in this preliminary trial demonstrate that further investigation of TALL-104 cell therapy is warranted.

Conventional-dose chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer. Philadelphia Bone Marrow Transplant Group.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a randomized trial in which we compared high-dose chemotherapy plus hematopoietic stem-cell rescue with a prolonged course of monthly conventional-dose chemotherapy in women with metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Women 18 to 60 years of age who had metastatic breast cancer received four to six cycles of standard combination chemotherapy. Patients who had a complete or partial response to induction chemotherapy were then randomly assigned to receive either a single course of high doses of carboplatin, thiotepa, and cyclophosphamide plus transplantation of autologous hematopoietic stem cells or up to 24 cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in conventional doses. The primary end point was survival. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 37 months. Of 553 patients who enrolled in the study, 58 had a complete response to induction chemotherapy and 252 had a partial response. Of these, 110 patients were assigned to receive high-dose chemotherapy plus hematopoietic stem cells and 89 were assigned to receive conventional-dose chemotherapy. In an intention-to-treat analysis, we found no significant difference in survival overall at three years between the two treatment groups (32 percent in the transplantation group and 38 percent in the conventional-chemotherapy group). There was no significant difference between the two treatments in the median time to progression of the disease (9.6 months for high-dose chemotherapy plus hematopoietic stem cells and 9.0 months for conventional-dose chemotherapy). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with maintenance chemotherapy in conventional doses, high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous stem-cell transplantation soon after the induction of a complete or partial remission with conventional-dose chemotherapy does not improve survival in women with metastatic breast cancer.

Autologous stem-cell transplant after conventional dose adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk breast cancer: impact on the delivery of local-regional radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation is used increasingly in the treatment of poor-prognosis primary breast cancer. Because these patients may be cured with standard multimodality therapy, it is important to address both the efficacy of transplantation, and its effect on the delivery of standard treatments including local radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with high risk primary breast cancer were treated with high-dose cyclophosphamide and thiotepa and stem-cell transplant following surgery and conventional-dose adjuvant chemotherapy. Outcome, including sites of failure and delivery of local radiation therapy, was assessed for 103 patients. RESULTS: Overall and disease-free survival rates at 18 months were 83% (+/- 4%) and 77% (+/- 4%) respectively. Twenty patients (19.4%) received radiation therapy prior to transplant. Of the remaining 83, 77 received radiation therapy after transplant. Overall, 5 (19.2%) of 26 first sites of recurrence were local alone. For patients receiving radiation prior to transplant, 3 of 7 (43%, 95% CI: 6%-80%) sites of first recurrence were local, while 2 of 19 (10.5%, 95% CI: 0%-24.5%) sites of first recurrence were local alone in patients receiving post-transplant radiation or no radiation. CONCLUSION: Transplantation does not appear to significantly compromise the delivery or outcome of local radiation therapy for primary breast cancer.

Stem cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer: analysis of tumor contamination.

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy, engraftment kinetics, effect of bone marrow tumor contamination, and safety of high-dose therapy and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support for patients with responding metastatic breast cancer. Forty two patients underwent G-CSF (10 microg/kg) stimulated PBPC harvest. PBPC and bone marrow aspirates were analyzed by histologic and immunocytochemical methods for tumor contamination. Thirty-seven patients received high-dose therapy consisting of cyclophosphamide 6 g/m2, thiotepa 500 mg/m2, and carboplatin 800 mg/m2 (CTCb) given as an infusion over 4 d followed by PBPC reinfusion and G-CSF (5 microg/kg) support. No transplant related deaths or grade 4 toxicity was recorded. CD34+ cells/kg infused was predictive of neutrophil and platelet recovery. With a median follow-up of 38 months, three year survival was 44% with relapse-free survival of 19%. Histological bone marrow involvement, found in 10 patients, was a negative prognostic factor and was associated with a median relapse-free survival of 3.5 months. Tumor contamination of PBPC by immunohistochemical staining was present in 22.5% of patients and found not to be correlated with decreased survival. G-CSF stimulated PBPC collection followed by a single course of high dose chemotherapy and stem cell infusion with G-CSF stimulated marrow recovery leads to rapid, reliable engraftment with low toxicity and promising outcome in women with responding metastatic breast cancer.