Ankle Arthroplasty-Does Preoperative Fixed Equinus Affect Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Postoperative sagittal range of motion, in particular degree of dorsiflexion, is critical for satisfactory outcomes in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). Although there is literature discussing techniques to treat a preoperative fixed equinus we are not aware of any papers presenting patient outcomes. We present patient-reported outcomes for our cohort of patients undergoing TAA with preoperative fixed equinus compared to plantigrade ankles. This is a single surgeon, cohort study of consecutive cases. Cases of primary TAA were identified from a local joint registry which prospectively records Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS), Short Form-36 (SF-36), and patient satisfaction. Revision cases or those with inadequate data were excluded. Patients were classified as fixed equinus or neutral based on both preoperative weightbearing lateral radiographs and clinical records. Overall 259 cases were identified, 92 were excluded leaving 167 cases for analysis (mean follow-up 81.7 months), 147 were classified as neutral and 20 fixed equinus. The fixed equinus group were significantly younger (neutral 63.9 vs equinus 52.9, p < .001). Stiffness was the only FAOS domain that was detectibly different at baseline (neutral 36.6 vs equinus 25.6, p = .044). Final FAOS scores, change from baseline and patient satisfaction was the same in all domains for both groups. There was no difference in revision rates. With the numbers available we did not demonstrate a postoperative difference in outcomes for patients with preoperative fixed equinus.

Nonunion Rates in Hind- and Midfoot Arthrodesis in Current, Ex-, and Nonsmokers.

BACKGROUND: Nonunion rates in hind or midfoot arthrodesis have been reported as high as 41%. The most notable and readily modifiable risk factor that has been identified is smoking. In 2018, 14.4% of the UK population were active smokers. We examined the effect of smoking status on union rates for a large cohort of patients undergoing hind- or midfoot arthrodesis. METHODS: In total, 381 consecutive primary joint arthrodeses were identified from a single surgeon's logbook (analysis performed on a per joint basis, with a triple fusion reported as 3 separate joints). Patients were divided based on self-reported smoking status. Primary outcome was clinical union. Delayed union, infection, and the need for ultrasound bone stimulation were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Smoking prevalence was 14.0%, and 32.2% were ex-smokers. Groups were comparable for sex, diabetes, and body mass index. Smokers were younger and had fewer comorbidities. Nonunion rates were higher in smokers (relative risk, 5.81; 95% CI, 2.54-13.29; P < .001) with no statistically significant difference between ex-smokers and nonsmokers. Smokers had higher rates of infection (P = .05) and bone stimulator use (P < .001). Among smokers, there was a trend toward slower union with heavier smoking (P = .004). CONCLUSION: This large retrospective cohort study confirmed previous evidence that smoking has a considerable negative effect on union in arthrodesis. The 5.81 relative risk in a modifiable risk factor is extremely high. Arthrodesis surgery should be undertaken with extreme caution in smokers. Our study shows that after cessation of smoking, the risk returns to normal, but we were unable to quantify the time frame. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Radiological Outcomes in Mobile-Bearing Total Ankle Arthroplasty With Varus or Valgus Deformity.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that varus deformity does not negatively affect total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) outcomes, but there is a sparsity of evidence for valgus deformity. We present our outcomes using a mobile-bearing prosthesis for neutral, varus, and valgus ankles. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive cases identified from a local joint registry. In total, 230 cases were classified based on preoperative radiographs as neutral (152 cases), varus greater than 10 degrees (60 cases), or valgus greater than 10 degrees (18 cases). Tibiotalar angle was again measured postoperatively and at final follow-up (mean follow-up of 55.9 months). A total of 164 cases had adequate patient-reported outcome measures data (Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, Short Form-36 [SF-36] scores, and patient satisfaction) for analysis (mean follow-up of 61.6 months). The groups were similar for body mass index and length of follow-up, but neutral ankles were younger (P = .021). RESULTS: Baseline scores were equal except SF-36 physical health, with valgus ankles scoring lowest (P = .045). Valgus ankles had better postoperative pain (P = .025) and function (P = .012) than neutral. Pre- to postoperative change did not reach statistical significance except physical health, in which valgus performed best (P = .039). Mean final angle for all groups was less than 5 degrees. There was no significant difference in revision rates. CONCLUSION: Our study is consistent with previous evidence that varus deformity does not affect outcome in TAA. In addition, in our cohort, outcomes were satisfactory with valgus alignment. Postoperative coronal radiological alignment was affected by preoperative deformity but within acceptable limits. Coronal plane deformity did not negatively affect radiological or clinical outcomes in TAA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Comparison of 5-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROMs) of Total Ankle Replacement (TAR) to Total Knee Replacement (TKR) and Total Hip Replacement (THR).

BACKGROUND: Total ankle replacement (TAR) is becoming a more common alternative to ankle arthrodesis for the improvement of pain and function in end-stage arthritis of the ankle. The effects of end-stage arthritis of the ankle are similar to those of end-stage hip arthritis. There is a paucity of literature on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following TARs in comparison with total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). We aimed to study the 1-, 3-, and 5-year outcomes of TAR in comparison with TKR and THR. METHODS: PROMs data from patients who underwent a primary THR, TKR, or TAR performed between March 2008 and 2013 over a 5-year period were collected from our hospital patient registry. They were divided into 3 groups based on the type of primary joint replacement. Patient demographics and patient-reported outcomes (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC], 36-item Short-Form (SF-36) scores, and patient satisfaction scores at follow-up) were compared preoperatively and at the 1-, 3-, and 5-year follow-ups. RESULTS: There were data available on 2672 THR, 3520 TKR, and 193 TAR patients preoperatively. Preoperatively, TAR patients reported statistically significantly higher function scores when compared with THR and TKR patients (40 vs 33; P = .001 [P < .05] and 40 vs 36; P = .001 [P < .05]). For SF-36 scores, there was no statistically significant difference between groups for the general health and role emotional components (P = .171 and .064, respectively [P > .05]); TAR patients reported similar scores to TKR patients for physical domains at the 3- and 5-year follow-ups (P > .05), and TAR patients also reported similar scores to both THR and TKR patients for the mental domains (P > .05). At 5 years postoperatively, TAR patients reported lower scores than THR and TKR patients for function and stiffness. For SF-36 scores, TAR patients reported similar outcomes to THR and TKR patients for mental health components (P > .05), similar scores to TKR patients for 3 of 4 physical domains (P < .05), but lower satisfaction rates for activities of daily living (ADL) and recreation when compared with THR (P < .05). CONCLUSION: TAR patients had similar outcomes to THR and TKR patients for disease-specific and mental health domains, and lower patient satisfaction rates in terms of pain relief, ADL, and recreation. Further research is warranted including clinical outcomes along with PROMs with a long-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative series.

Two-year outcomes of MOBILITY Total Ankle Replacement.

BACKGROUND: There is little literature on patient-reported outcomes following total ankle replacement in patients with osteoarthritis, posttraumatic osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis. We compared the differences in demographic data and clinical and patient-reported outcomes among patients with those types of arthritis who underwent total ankle replacement performed with use of the MOBILITY Total Ankle System. METHODS: Patients were divided into three groups based on the preoperative diagnosis of type of arthritis. We analyzed patient demographic data, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, and patient-reported outcomes as measured with use of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), the 36-item Short-Form (SF-36) Health Survey, and patient-satisfaction scores, collected preoperatively and at one and two years postoperatively. RESULTS: The study included 106 consecutive patients who underwent total ankle replacement between March 2006 and December 2009. The posttraumatic osteoarthritis group, which had twenty-eight patients, was significantly younger (mean age, 54.8 yrs; p < 0.05) than the other groups; the rheumatoid arthritis group, which had twenty-two patients, had a significantly lower mean body mass index (24.5 kg/m(2); p < 0.05); and the osteoarthritis group, which had fifty-six patients, had a higher proportion of males (41 males; p < 0.05). The posttraumatic osteoarthritis group reported better scores for two of the eight domains of the SF-36 preoperatively. At one year postoperatively, the posttraumatic osteoarthritis group and the rheumatoid arthritis group had better FAOS results regarding pain than those of the osteoarthritis group, and the posttraumatic osteoarthritis group also reported better scores for the general health domain of the SF-36. At two years, the posttraumatic group continued to show significantly higher scores for the general health domain of the SF-36. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the AOFAS scores, other FAOS results, or the patient-satisfaction scores at one and two years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that early outcomes after total ankle replacement for patients with posttraumatic osteoarthritis are comparable with those for patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.