Is there a benefit of aspirin therapy for primary prevention to reduce the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with elevated Lipoprotein (a)-A review of the evidence.

Aspirin has long been recognized as a beneficial treatment for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) due to its antiplatelet effects. However, there is a need to more precisely identify individuals who would benefit from aspirin therapy for primary prevention in order to reduce the risk of ASCVD. Those with elevated lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels are at increased risk of ASCVD. In this article, we provide an overview of studies that have explored the use of aspirin therapy in individuals with elevated Lp(a). We discuss the potential mechanisms by which aspirin therapy may reduce ASCVD risk, and present a review of the data on the effectiveness of aspirin therapy in reducing ASCVD risk in individuals with elevated Lp(a). The presented evidence suggests that individuals with elevated Lp(a) benefit more from aspirin therapy for reduction of ASCVD events than the general population.

Safety outcomes of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes and other risk factors for cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) have emerged as standard therapy for heart failure. We aim to assess the safety of SGLT2-Is in patients with a high risk of cardiovascular disease. Areas covered: An electronic database search was conducted for randomized control trials comparing SGLT2-Is to placebo in patients with a high risk of cardiac disease or heart failure. Data were pooled for outcomes using random-effect models. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to compare eight safety outcomes between the two groups. The analysis included ten studies with 71 553 participants, among whom 39 053 received SGLT2-Is; 28 809 were male and 15 655 were female (mean age, 65.2 years). The mean follow-up period was 2.3 years with the range being 0.8-4.2 years. The SGLT2-Is group had a significant reduction in AKI (OR = 0.8;95% CI 0.74-0.90) and serious adverse effects (OR = 0.9; 95% CI 0.83-0.96) as compared to placebo. No difference was found in fracture (OR = 1.1; 95% CI 0.91-1.24), amputation (OR = 1.1; 95% CI 1.00-1.29), hypoglycemia (OR 0.98;95% CI 0.83-1.15), and UTI (OR = 1.1; 95% CI 1.00-1.22). In contrast, DKA (OR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.65-3.60) and volume depletion (OR = 1.2; 95% CI 1.07-1.41) were higher in SGLT2-Is group. Expert opinion/commentary: The benefits of SLGT2-Is outweigh the risk of adverse events. They may reduce the risk of AKI but are associated with an increased risk of DKA and volume depletion. Further studies are warranted to monitor a wider range of safety outcomes of SGLT2-Is.

Association of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors With Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Other Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-analysis.

Importance: The cardiovascular outcome in selected populations when sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2-Is) are emerging as standard therapy is not clearly understood. It is important to learn the magnitude of cardiovascular benefit using SGLT2-Is across the select subgroups that include both sexes and multiple age and racial and ethnic groups. Objectives: To evaluate the association between use of SGLT2-Is and cardiovascular benefits in a prespecified group in a larger sample size using data obtained from randomized clinical trials. Data Sources: Search of electronic databases PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Cochrane from inception to January 10, 2021, with additional studies identified through conference papers and meeting presentations, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists of published studies. Study Selection: Placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials in which participants had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or risk factors for ASCVD, diabetes, or heart failure and which reported the primary outcome were included in this study. Multicenter observational and nonobservational studies and those with different outcomes of interest were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Medical Subject Heading search terms included SGLT2-I and multiple cardiovascular outcomes in different combinations. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. The analysis of all outcomes was performed using a Mantel-Haenszel equation and the random-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures: Six efficacy outcomes of SGLT2-I use (cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure [HHF] as the primary outcome and major adverse cardiovascular event, HHF, cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality as secondary outcomes), were evaluated. Subgroup analysis was performed for the primary outcome of cardiovascular death or HHF. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were used to compare 2 interventions. Results: Ten studies with 71 553 participants were included, among whom 39 053 received SGLT2-Is; among studies that reported these data, 28 809 were men and 15 655 were women (mean age, 65.2 [range, 61.9-70.0] years). Race and ethnicity were defined in the original trials and were categorized as Asian, Black, or other (6900 participants) and White (26 646 participants) for the purposes of this analysis (the category "other" was not specified consistently). In terms of age, 16 793 were younger than 65 years and 17 087 were 65 years or older. At a mean follow-up 2.3 (range, 0.8-4.2) years, the SGLT2-I group favored reduction in primary outcome (3165 of 39 053 [8.10%] vs 3756 of 32 500 [11.56%]; OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.55-0.80]; P < .001). No difference was noted in the rate of acute myocardial infarction compared with the placebo group (1256 of 26 931 [4.66%] vs 958 of 20 373 [4.70%]; OR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.87-1.03]; P = .22). Subgroup analysis favored SGLT2-I use for the primary outcome in both sexes, age groups, and racial and ethnic groups. Conclusions and Relevance: This meta-analysis supports that SGLT2-Is have emerged as an effective class of drugs for improving cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in selected patients. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors were not associated with reduced risk of acute myocardial infarction. Future long-term prospective studies are warranted to understand the long-term cardiovascular benefits.

Comprehensive evaluation of cardiovascular efficacy and safety outcomes of SGLT2 inhibitors in high risk patients of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate a magnitude of the cardiovascular benefits, concomitantly analyzing the safety outcomes of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2-I) comprehensively, as a class effect in a larger sample size combined from recent randomized control trials. METHODS: We searched electronic databases using specific terms and evaluated 6 efficacy and 10 safety outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to compare two interventions. RESULTS: Five studies (n = 41 267) were included, among which 23 539 received SGLT2-I. The SGLT2-I group favored reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.98; P = 0.03), cardiovascular death (CVD) or heart failure hospitalization (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.46-0.80; P = 0.0004), rate of hospitalization for heart failure (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.44-0.72; P < 0.00001), CVD (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.93; P = 0.01), all-cause mortality (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.48-0.93; P = 0.02) and myocardial infarction (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.64-0.99; P = 0.04) when compared to the placebo group. Safety analysis showed higher diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) rate in SGLT2-I group (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.40-3.90; P = 0.001); in contrast, major hypoglycemic events were significantly lower (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.73-0.87; P < 0.00001). AKI was significantly higher in the placebo group (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65-0.88; P = 0.0004). There were no statistically significant effects on other outcomes. CONCLUSION: In selected high-risk patients of cardiovascular disease, the SGLT2-I is a potential effective class of drugs for improving cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality without an increased risk of all other major complications except DKA on this meta-analysis.

Knowledge and practice of healthy lifestyle and dietary habits in medical and non-medical students of Karachi, Pakistan.

OBJECTIVE: To objectively compare the differences in knowledge and practices regarding healthy lifestyle among medical and non-medical students of Karachi along with assessment of any perceived barriers. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 350 students between ages 17-24 years from 6 private universities of Karachi--three medical and three non-medical Institutions. A self-reported questionnaire was employed to assess attitude and barriers to healthy practices among the simple random selection of students. RESULTS: On a 10-point scale, the average knowledge score of students on general and clinical nutritional knowledge was 5.7 +/- 1.51 and 4.4 +/- 1.77, respectively and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Conversely the diet and lifestyle score (85-point scale) among medical (41.3) and non medical students (40.8) was not significant (p = 0.646). There was no difference between the perception of medical and non-medical students regarding 'work-related stress' in their life. 'Lack of time' was cited as the most important reason for skipping meals and as a barrier to exercising regularly among both groups. CONCLUSION: The knowledge, attitudes and practices of medical students in Karachi suggest that superior knowledge about healthy lifestyle does not necessarily result into better practices.

Awareness of cancer risk factors among patients and attendants presenting to a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan.

OBJECTIVE: To determine awareness of cancer risk factors in the patients and attendants of Out-patient Clinics at a University Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 315 respondents reporting to a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan, to assess their level of awareness regarding risk factors of cancer. RESULTS: The respondents belonged to an urban population with the mean time spent in Karachi of 29.1 years (SD +/- 13.94). There were 213 (67%) males and 102 (33%) females. All respondents had heard of the word 'cancer', while only 57.5% were aware of cancer risk factors. However, only 42.8% could identify age, 33% diet, 35% drugs and 31% obesity as risk factors for cancer. Even those who were aware of the risk factors were not able to appreciate personal risk of cancer. CONCLUSION: Despite awareness regarding some of the risk factors, the surveyed population was not aware of intrinsic risk factors for cancers like increasing age and obesity. It is important to create awareness through educational programs on cancer prevention, dissemination of knowledge pertaining to the preventable and avoidable cancer risk factors, the benefits of early diagnosis, and availability of screening tests.