Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Diabetes ; 42(2): 266-273, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38694250

ABSTRACT

The American Diabetes Association advises clinicians of the potential for insulin overbasalization in the management of type 2 diabetes. Described as the titration of basal insulin beyond an appropriate dose, overbasalization increases risks for adverse effects such as hypoglycemia and weight gain without achieving the glycemic targets needed to optimally manage the disease. There is a need to determine the prevalence of and clinical factors that can lead to overbasalization. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of and characterize the patient variables associated with overbasalization in a family medicine practice.

2.
Cureus ; 13(7): e16355, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34414041

ABSTRACT

Objective Evaluate nutrition literacy in uninsured subjects with diabetes mellitus (DM) who presented to free diabetes management classes.  Design  This single-site, cross-sectional observational study recruited thirty subjects from a free clinic for uninsured patients to attend diabetes mellitus, self-management classes. Before starting the classes, DM care-related data were collected, and subjects were administered the Nutrition Literacy Assessment Instrument (NLit). The assessment covers six subscales in nutrition and categorizes results into three possible categories: the likelihood of poor nutrition literacy (NLit Score ≤ 44), the possibility of poor nutrition literacy (NLit Score- 45-57), and the likelihood of good nutrition literacy (NLit score ≥ 58).  Results  Median glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was 7.45% for study participants. The mean NLit score was 38.1 (SD ± 9.4), correlating with a likelihood of poor nutrition literacy. All participants had either likelihood or the possibility of poor nutrition literacy based on the NLit Assessment. There were no participants who scored in the range of likelihood of good nutrition literacy. Subjects who scored in the range of likelihood of poor nutrition literacy had a significantly higher mean HbA1c (8.6 %) than those who scored in the possibility of poor nutrition literacy (6.9 %, p=0.005). Conclusions Poor nutrition literacy is associated with worse glycemic control among uninsured subjects with diabetes mellitus.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...