Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis ; 77: 59-69, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36841492

ABSTRACT

Despite sleep's fundamental role in maintaining and improving physical and mental health, many people get less than the recommended amount of sleep or suffer from sleeping disorders. This review highlights sleep's instrumental biological functions, various sleep problems, and sleep hygiene and lifestyle interventions that can help improve sleep quality. Quality sleep allows for improved cardiovascular health, mental health, cognition, memory consolidation, immunity, reproductive health, and hormone regulation. Sleep disorders, such as insomnia, sleep apnea, and circadian-rhythm-disorders, or disrupted sleep from lifestyle choices, environmental conditions, or other medical issues can lead to significant morbidity and can contribute to or exacerbate medical and psychiatric conditions. The best treatment for long-term sleep improvement is proper sleep hygiene through behavior and sleep habit modification. Recommendations to improve sleep include achieving 7 to 9 h of sleep, maintaining a consistent sleep/wake schedule, a regular bedtime routine, engaging in regular exercise, and adopting a contemplative practice. In addition, avoiding many substances late in the day can help improve sleep. Caffeine, alcohol, heavy meals, and light exposure later in the day are associated with fragmented poor-quality sleep. These sleep hygiene practices can promote better quality and duration of sleep, with corresponding health benefits.


Subject(s)
Sleep Hygiene , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Humans , Sleep Hygiene/physiology , Sleep , Exercise , Mental Health
2.
J Am Dent Assoc ; 153(11): 1096-1103, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34799013

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this article is to discuss the scientific evidence available on the pathophysiology and management of otologic complaints in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). TYPES OF STUDIES REVIEWED: The authors conducted an electronic search in MEDLINE, Web of Science and ScienceDirect and retrieved all the relevant peer-reviewed journal articles available in English on the topic. No time restriction was applied. RESULTS: No consensus exists on the management of otologic symptoms in patients with concomitant TMD. The scientific evidence suggests that conservative or reversible TMD therapy might provide relief. However, this evidence is scarce and low, thus further studies with larger sample sizes and better designed methodological frameworks are needed. Until such evidence is available, dentists and orofacial pain specialists should treat TMD patients using current guidelines and refer those with otologic symptoms to an otolaryngologist. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Given the wide range of potential pathophysiologies and treatments for each otologic symptom described in the TMD patient, close collaboration with otolaryngologists is essential to achieve the best patient care.


Subject(s)
Ear Diseases , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders , Humans , Ear Diseases/complications , Ear Diseases/therapy , Ear Diseases/diagnosis , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/complications , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/therapy , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnosis , Facial Pain/etiology , Facial Pain/therapy
3.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 25(6): 379-84, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15547805

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Review the microbiology of chronic rhinosinusitis and test the hypothesis that bacterial infections are not the predominant etiology for chronic rhinosinusitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tissue cultures were prospectively collected from the ethmoid mucosa of 179 patients (94 had chronic rhinosinusitis and 85 had chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis) at the time of endoscopic sinus surgery. All patients were off antibiotics for at least 1 week at the time of surgery. Both aerobic and anaerobic cultures were obtained for each specimen. RESULTS: A total of 263 isolates were identified (average: 1.5 isolates per specimen). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, a likely contaminant, was the most common isolate and was identified in 51% of patients. Forty percent of patients (72/179) grew pathogenic aerobic bacteria, the most common was Staphylococcus aureus (18%). Six percent of patients (10/179) grew pathogenic anaerobic bacteria. The microbiology of patients with and without nasal polyposis was not significantly different. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that factors other than bacterial infection may play an integral role in the pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/complications , Ethmoid Sinusitis/microbiology , Adult , Bacteria, Anaerobic/isolation & purification , Chronic Disease , Ethmoid Sinusitis/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Nasal Mucosa/microbiology , Nasal Polyps/microbiology , Prospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/complications , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...