Oncologic Outcomes of Surgery Versus SBRT for Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma is subject to debate. The aim of this study was to compare overall survival and oncologic outcomes of lobar resection (LR), sublobar resection (SR), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes of propensity matched comparative and noncomparative cohort studies was performed. Outcomes of interest were overall survival and disease-free survival. The inverse variance method and the random-effects method for meta-analysis were utilized to assess the pooled estimates. RESULTS: A total of 100 studies with patients treated for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma were included. Long-term overall and disease-free survival after LR was superior over SBRT in all comparisons, and for most comparisons, SR was superior to SBRT. Noncomparative studies showed superior long-term overall and disease-free survival for both LR and SR over SBRT. Although the papers were heterogeneous and of low quality, results remained essentially the same throughout a large number of stratifications and sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that LR has superior outcomes compared to SBRT for cI non-small-cell lung carcinoma. New trials are underway evaluating long-term results of SBRT in potentially operable patients.

Oncological Outcomes of Lobar Resection, Segmentectomy, and Wedge Resection for T1a Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The optimal treatment of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains subject to debate. Lobar resection is considered the standard of care, but sublobar resections are a lung parenchymal-sparing treatment offering promising results. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare oncological outcomes of lobar resections and parenchymal-sparing resections for T1a NSCLC. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge Search, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies reporting oncological outcomes following lobar or parenchymal-sparing resections. Two researchers independently identified studies and extracted data. Oncological outcomes were compared for each surgical modality using the Mantel-Haenszel method, and outcomes were pooled for each modality using the inverse variance method. A total of 11,195 studies were identified and 28 articles were included. For pT1a tumors, there was no difference in 5-year overall survival when lobar resection (n = 15,003) was compared to parenchymal-sparing resection (n = 1224), with a relative risk of 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.84-1.01). Five-year overall survival and disease-free survival after segmentectomy yielded equal survival compared to lobar resection in directly comparing studies and point estimates of noncomparative studies. In most comparisons, wedge resection showed comparable results to lobar resections and segmentectomy. Subanalysis of intentional parenchymal-sparing surgery showed favorable results. This study shows that parenchymal-sparing surgery yields equivocal survival compared to lobar surgery for stage T1a NSCLC. However, a drawback in implementing parenchymal-sparing resection for lobectomy-tolerable patients is the risk of nodal upstaging.

Survival After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Clinically Diagnosed or Biopsy-Proven Early-Stage NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a promising curative treatment for early-stage NSCLC. It is unclear if survival outcomes for SBRT are influenced by a lack of pathological confirmation of malignancy and staging of disease in these patients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assess survival outcomes after SBRT in studies with patients with clinically diagnosed versus biopsy-proven early-stage NSCLC. METHODS: The main databases were searched for trials and cohort studies without restrictions to publication status or language. Two independent researchers performed the screening and selection of eligible studies. Outcomes were overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and disease-free survival. The inverse variance method and the random effects method for meta-analysis were used to assess pooled survival estimates. RESULTS: A total of 11,195 nonduplicate records were identified by the original search strategy. After screening by title and abstract, 1051 potentially eligible records were identified. A total of 43 articles were included. The comparative studies showed lower 3-year overall survival and lower 2-year and 5-year cancer-specific survival for biopsy-proven disease compared to clinical disease. However, 5-year overall survival was the same for both groups. For the pooled estimates, 3-year disease-free survival and 2-year cancer-specific survival were lower for biopsied disease. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis show a discrepancy in oncological outcomes for patients undergoing SBRT for suspected early-stage NSCLC in whom there is pathologic conformation of malignancy and those who there is only a clinical diagnose of NSCLC. These results emphasize the importance of obtaining pathologic proof of malignancy.

Trauma and BMI Mortality.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Obesity has been recognized as an impactful comorbid condition. It has been demonstrated to be an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality following trauma. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple studies and reviews have strongly suggested obesity to be associated with increased risk for post-injury morbidity and mortality. As obesity is associated with a pro-inflammatory state, it has been suggested to negatively affect the respiratory, cardiovascular, coagulation, and renal systems and the ability and manner in which an obese patient heals. As obesity continues to rise at alarming rates in the USA, this population of patients requires special consideration and continued research is underway to delineate relationships between obesity, trauma, and outcomes in an effort to improve overall care.

Open access phone triage for veterans with suspected malignant pleural mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: Phone triaging patients with suspected malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) within the Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA) system offers a model for rapid, expert guided evaluation for patients with rare and treatable diseases within a national integrated healthcare system. To assess feasibility of national open access telephone triage using evidence-based treatment recommendations for patients with MPM, measure timelines of the triage and referral process and record the impact on "intent to treat" for patients using our service. METHODS: A retrospective study. The main outcome measures were: (1) ability to perform long distance phone triage, (2) to assess the speed of access to a mesothelioma surgical specialist for patients throughout the entire VHA, and (3) to determine if access to a specialist would alter the plan of care. RESULTS: Sixty veterans were screened by our phone triage program, 38 traveled an average of 997 miles to VA Boston Healthcare system. On average, 14 d elapsed from initial phone contact until the patient was physically evaluated in our general thoracic clinic in Boston. The treatment plan was altered for 71% of patients evaluated at VA Boston Healthcare system based on 2012 International Mesothelioma Interest Group guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience demonstrates that in-network centralized care for Veterans with MPM is feasible within the VHA. National open access phone triage improves access to expert surgical advice and can be delivered in a timely manner for Veterans using our service. Guideline-based treatment recommendations ("intent to treat") changed the therapeutic course for the majority of patients who used our service.

Benign Metastasizing Leiomyomas to the Lungs: An Institutional Case Series and a Review of the Recent Literature.

BACKGROUND: Benign metastasizing leiomyomas (BMLs) represent the extrauterine spread of a benign uterine process. Pulmonary BMLs are the most common example of distant spread of uterine leiomyomas and are usually found incidentally in premenopausal women. The rarity of BMLs accounts for the limited literature that currently exists regarding their underlying pathophysiology, disease course, and management. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of all BML cases diagnosed and managed at Brigham and Women's Hospital during a 22-year period. The demographic and clinical characteristics of these patients were compared with a PubMed-derived cohort of BML cases reported since 2006. RESULTS: Benign metastasizing leiomyoma tumors were identified in 10 Brigham and Women's Hospital patients, whereas 57 cases were reported in the literature. The average age at diagnosis was 54.1 and 46.7 years, respectively. Mean interval time from a pertinent gynecologic procedure to BML diagnosis was 23 years at Brigham and Women's Hospital. All patients demonstrated positivity for actin, desmin, and estrogen/progesterone receptors, confirming the diagnosis of uterine leiomyomas. Management primarily consisted of diagnostic resection with subsequent observation with or without hormonal suppression for residual pulmonary nodules. Progression of residual BMLs was noticed in 30% and 8.3% of Brigham and Women's Hospital and literature patients, respectively, when follow-up was reported. One patient in our series required further surgical management. CONCLUSIONS: Benign metastasizing leiomyomas are a rare cause of pulmonary nodules. They likely represent a clonal spread of uterine leiomyomas to the lungs. Management includes pathologic diagnosis with long-term surveillance with or without hormonal manipulation.

Trauma education in a state of emergency: a curriculum-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: Trauma is the leading cause of death from ages 1-44-y in the United States and the fifth leading cause of death overall, but there are few studies quantifying trauma education in medical school. This study reviews curriculum hours devoted to trauma education at a northeastern medical school. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the preclinical curriculum at a northeastern medical school affiliated with three adult and two pediatric level I trauma centers verified by the American College of Surgeons. We reviewed curricular hours and we categorized them according to the leading ten causes of death in the United States. We also compared the number of educational hours devoted to trauma to other leading causes of death. RESULTS: The total amount of time devoted to trauma education in the first 2 y of medical school was 6.5 h. No lectures were given on the fundamentals of trauma management, traumatic brain injury, or chest or abdominal trauma. The most covered topic was heart disease (128 h), followed by chronic lower respiratory disease (80 h). Curricular time for heart disease, chronic lower respiratory disease, cancer, diabetes, renal disease, and influenza and pneumonia far exceeded that devoted to trauma, after adjusting for the mortality burden of these diseases (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that trauma education at a northeastern medical school is nearly absent. With the large burden of trauma and rise in mass casualty incidence, the preclinical curriculum might not be sufficient to expose students to the fundamentals of trauma management. A broader multi-institutional study may shed more insight on these curricular deficiencies in trauma education and detect if these deficiencies are widespread nationally.