Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 18(5): 469-73, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16607140

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Laser-induced shock-wave lithotripsy (LISL) is successfully used for the treatment of difficult bile duct stones. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term risk for a symptomatic bile duct stone recurrence after LISL and to detect risk factors predicting recurrence. METHODS: Between 1993 and 2001, 80 patients with difficult bile duct stones were successfully treated by intracorporeal LISL through the papilla of Vater. Seventy-one of these patients [median age, 65.8 years; 51 women (71.8%)] were followed for a median (range) period of 58 (1-114) months. RESULTS: Eleven patients (15.5%) had a symptomatic stone recurrence. The median (range) period between laser lithotripsy and recurrence was 40 (5-85) months. The presence of a bile duct stenosis (P=0.032) and a body-mass index below 25 (P=0.025) were significantly associated with an increased risk for stone recurrence. A gallbladder in situ, the presence of gallbladder stones, dilation of the bile duct, or a peripapillary diverticulum was not associated with stone recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a bile duct stenosis is significantly related to bile duct stone recurrence after treatment with LISL. The impact of the body mass index on stone recurrence is interesting. The gallbladder status did not predict stone recurrence in our study.


Subject(s)
Gallstones/surgery , Lithotripsy, Laser/methods , Aged , Body Mass Index , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/methods , Common Bile Duct Diseases/complications , Common Bile Duct Diseases/pathology , Constriction, Pathologic/complications , Constriction, Pathologic/pathology , Female , Gallbladder/pathology , Gallbladder/surgery , Gallstones/complications , Gallstones/pathology , Humans , Lithotripsy, Laser/adverse effects , Male , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic/methods , Time Factors
2.
Europace ; 7(4): 319-26, 2005 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15944090

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the absence of comparative studies, recommended routine follow-up (FU) intervals for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients range from 1 to 6 months; most patients are followed at 3 month intervals. METHODS: Six hundred and eighteen ICD patients were routinely seen 4 weeks after implant and then every 3 months. Unplanned visits (UPV) were either patient initiated or due to manufacturer recalls. FU visits included patient history/examination, ICD interrogation, pacing/sensing threshold and pacing/shock impedance. Chest X-rays were performed every 6 months. To validate FU interval recommendations, a comparative analysis on the detection of complications was performed, relying either on the information of every, or of every other FU visit, i.e., on 3 or 6 month intervals. RESULTS: During 3.3+/-2.8 years, 137 complications occurred in 110 patients (17%). However, identification of only 34% was dependent on the FU schedule, since the mode of detection was ICD interrogation in 38 and history/physical examination in nine patients. The remainder was diagnosed by UPV in 47, manufacturer recall in seven, accidental discovery during device replacement in two, and routine X-ray in 34 patients. Complication free survival at 2 years was 86.4% for patients implanted before 1999, and 89.2% thereafter (P=0.003). Regarding 6 rather than 3 month FU intervals, a theoretical maximum delay of 3 months in the detection of potentially life-threatening complications would have occurred in 1.7% of all patients. For those implanted after 1999, this related to only 0.9%. CONCLUSIONS: ICD-related complications detected during routine FU visits are relatively rare, particularly with newer generation ICD systems. Thus, 6 month FU intervals appear to be safe. With new developments such as patient alert features and telemedical data transmission, FU intervals in ICD clinics might even be further extended.


Subject(s)
Defibrillators, Implantable , Defibrillators, Implantable/adverse effects , Equipment Failure , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors
3.
Transfusion ; 43(3): 405-10, 2003 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12675729

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Iron (Fe) depletion is common among regular whole-blood donors, but can be prevented through regular oral Fe supplementation. Little is known, however, about the Fe metabolism of donors undergoing intensive plasmapheresis. These donors lose considerable amounts of blood drawn for laboratory analyses and remaining in the disposable plastic sets. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Menstruating women were enrolled in a prospective placebo- controlled double-blind study. One hundred women were randomly allocated to receive either 100 mg of elemental Fe per day or placebo over 24 weeks and asked to donate plasma at 1-week intervals. Hb was determined before each plasmapheresis. Ferritin, transferrin, and Fe concentration and reticulocyte count were measured every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Thirty donors in the placebo group and 29 receiving Fe completed the study. The total mean blood loss was 526 mL in the placebo group and 546 mL in the Fe arm (p=0.271). The number of donations with Hb values lower than 12.5 g per dL requiring prolongation of the time interval until the next plasmapheresis was significantly greater in the placebo arm. In the placebo group (n=30), ferritin levels began to decline significantly 4 weeks after entry. When the study was completed, Hb concentration and reticulocyte count also were found to be significantly lower in the placebo group than in the Fe study arm (p=0.028 and p=0.036, respectively). Hb, ferritin, and transferrin levels and reticulocyte counts did not change significantly in the Fe group during the observation period. CONCLUSION: Menstruating women undergoing regular plasmapheresis at short intervals are prone to develop Fe depletion. This can be prevented by regular Fe intake. Laboratory analyses in product plasma instead of serum gained from whole-blood samples could be an alternative to reduce blood loss.


Subject(s)
Hemoglobins/analysis , Iron, Dietary/administration & dosage , Iron/metabolism , Menstruation , Plasmapheresis/adverse effects , Adult , Dietary Supplements , Double-Blind Method , Female , Ferritins/blood , Humans , Iron/blood , Placebos , Prospective Studies , Reticulocyte Count , Transferrin/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...