Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
2.
Rev Recent Clin Trials ; 18(3): 228-237, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36843368

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pituitary neurosurgery executed via the transsphenoidal endonasal approach is commonly performed for pituitary adenomas. Reasons for prolonged hospital stay include postoperative headache and protracted nausea with or without vomiting. Bilateral superficial trigeminal nerve blocks of the supra-orbital V1 and infra-orbital V2 (SION) nerves performed intra-operatively as a regional anesthetic adjunct to general anesthesia were hypothesized to decrease 6 hours postoperative morphine PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) use by patients. METHODS: Forty-nine patients, following induction of general anesthesia for their transsphenoidal surgery, were prospectively randomized in a double-blinded fashion to receive additional regional anesthesia as either a block (0.5% ropivacaine with epi 1:200,000) or placebo/sham (0.9% normal saline). The primary endpoint of the study was systemic morphine PCA opioid consumption by the two groups in the first 6-hours postoperatively. The secondary endpoints included (1) pain exposure experienced postoperatively, (2) incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and (3) time to eligibility for PACU discharge. RESULTS: Of the 49 patients that were enrolled, 3 patients were excluded due to protocol violations. Ultimately, there was no statistically significant difference between morphine PCA use in the 6 hours postoperatively between the block and placebo/sham groups. There was, however, a slight visual tendency in the block group for higher pain scores, morphine use p=0.046, and delayed PACU discharge. False discovery rate corrected comparisons at each time point and then revealed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. There were no differences between the two groups for secondary endpoints. CONCLUSION: It was found that a 6-hour postoperative headache after endoscopic trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery likely has a more complicated mechanism involving more than the superficial trigeminovascular system and perhaps is neuro-modulated by other brain nuclei.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Conduction , Nerve Block , Neurosurgery , Humans , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Nerve Block/adverse effects , Nerve Block/methods , Treatment Outcome , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Anesthesia, Conduction/adverse effects , Morphine/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Vomiting , Headache , Double-Blind Method
3.
Handb Clin Neurol ; 169: 285-295, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32553296

ABSTRACT

Patients receiving treatment for a meningioma require anesthesia when undergoing open craniotomy and, in some cases, during preoperative tumor embolization and radiosurgery. Adequate anesthesia management is integral to patients' perioperative care, which consists of the three phases of preoperative assessment and optimization, intraoperative care, and postoperative recovery. The preoperative anesthesia evaluation focusses on the cardiorespiratory and neurologic systems, as well as the airway, but also extends to ensure the optimal treatment of significant comorbidities before surgical intervention. The goals of intraoperative care are maintenance of brain physiology, facilitating surgery, and correcting any adverse effects of surgery and underlying pathology to preserve general patient homeostasis. This requires adequate intraoperative patient monitoring, cardiorespiratory support, management of infusion therapy, and application of knowledge about the effects of anesthetic agents on brain physiology. The anesthesiologist's responsibilities for patient care extend well into the postoperative recovery period, with a focus on pain control, prevention, and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and, in some patients, intensive care therapy.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General/adverse effects , Intraoperative Care , Meningeal Neoplasms/surgery , Meningioma/surgery , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/surgery , Airway Management , Humans , Meningeal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting/etiology
4.
J Clin Anesth ; 64: 109850, 2020 Apr 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32361223

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Few studies have compared continuous epidural infusion (CEI) against programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgery. It has not been established whether the modality of epidural medication administration affects postoperative pain and other patient outcomes. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of PIEB against CEI in postoperative pain management after a broad range of surgeries with abdominal incisions, all managed in the context of an established enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Postoperative acute care. PATIENTS: 120 patients scheduled for major surgery involving abdominal incisions with planned postoperative epidural analgesia were enrolled as study participants. INTERVENTIONS: All subjects received a standardized epidural solution containing ropivacaine 0.0625% and fentanyl 2 µg/ml. The CEI group received this solution as a continuous infusion, while the PIEB group received this solution as programmed intermittent boluses. MEASUREMENTS: The primary study outcome was the total local anesthetic used over the first 24 h post-operatively. Secondary outcomes included pain severity, pain interference, total opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. MAIN RESULTS: There was no difference in the primary outcome of total amount of local anesthetic administered in the first 24-hour postoperative period (PIEB: 123 mg [Interquartile Range (IQR): 114-136]; CEI: 126 mg [IQR: 120-134]). There were also no differences in average pain severity, total opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, number of PCEA requests and incidence of adverse events at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that within the context of an established ERAS program, PIEB and CEI modes of epidural analgesia can be equally efficacious and safe in providing postoperative analgesia after major abdominal surgery.

5.
Emerg Med J ; 27(8): 639-40, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20511642

ABSTRACT

An adult man was brought into the emergency department after deliberate ingestion of dinitrophenol: an agent that uncouples mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. The patient rapidly developed a hyper-metabolic state with fever, respiratory failure and died within a few hours after admission. Dinitrophenol is used in the manufacture of dyes, pesticides and explosives. Sub-acute poisoning is associated with weight-loss and the substance had been prescribed for this purpose during the 1930s in the United States before being banned due to serious side effects. Although remaining unlicensed as a drug, dinitrophenol is widely available through mail-order websites and online pharmacies, which promote it as an anti-obesity treatment. This case highlights the need for awareness of possibly increasing rates of accidental poisoning with a growing obesity prevalence and availability of this unlicensed drug through the internet. Additionally, we discuss the use of dantrolene in dinitrophenol poisoning and question whether current Toxbase/UK National Poison Information Service treatment guidelines regarding the indication and dosing of this drug, the only relatively specific treatment in dinitrophenol poisoning presently recommended, could be revised.


Subject(s)
2,4-Dinitrophenol/poisoning , Dantrolene/therapeutic use , Emergency Treatment/methods , Muscle Relaxants, Central/therapeutic use , Adult , Calcium Gluconate/therapeutic use , Fatal Outcome , Humans , Hyperkalemia/drug therapy , Hyperkalemia/etiology , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Poisoning/complications , Poisoning/drug therapy
6.
Anesth Analg ; 106(1): 55-7, table of contents, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18165550

ABSTRACT

Attempted pulmonary artery catheterization via the left internal jugular vein resulted in a misdiagnosis of pulmonary hypertension before transesophageal echocardiography revealed the catheter positioned in the ascending aorta. Inadvertent aortic cannulation through an unusual type of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection was confirmed with transcatheter fluoroscopy and later at autopsy. Partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection describes one or more of the pulmonary veins draining into the right atrium or its tributaries instead of the left atrium.


Subject(s)
Aorta/diagnostic imaging , Brachiocephalic Veins/abnormalities , Catheterization, Swan-Ganz/adverse effects , Diagnostic Errors , Echocardiography, Transesophageal , Hypertension, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Pulmonary Veins/abnormalities , Autopsy , Brachiocephalic Veins/diagnostic imaging , Catheterization, Swan-Ganz/instrumentation , Fatal Outcome , Fluoroscopy , Humans , Hypertension, Pulmonary/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Veins/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...