Analyzing Large Language Models' Responses to Common Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery Questions: A Comparison Between ChatGPT and Bard.

OBJECTIVE: In the digital age, patients turn to online sources for lumbar spine fusion information, necessitating a careful study of large language models (LLMs) like chat generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT) for patient education. METHODS: Our study aims to assess the response quality of Open AI (artificial intelligence)'s ChatGPT 3.5 and Google's Bard to patient questions on lumbar spine fusion surgery. We identified 10 critical questions from 158 frequently asked ones via Google search, which were then presented to both chatbots. Five blinded spine surgeons rated the responses on a 4-point scale from 'unsatisfactory' to 'excellent.' The clarity and professionalism of the answers were also evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: In our evaluation of 10 questions across ChatGPT 3.5 and Bard, 97% of responses were rated as excellent or satisfactory. Specifically, ChatGPT had 62% excellent and 32% minimally clarifying responses, with only 6% needing moderate or substantial clarification. Bard's responses were 66% excellent and 24% minimally clarifying, with 10% requiring more clarification. No significant difference was found in the overall rating distribution between the 2 models. Both struggled with 3 specific questions regarding surgical risks, success rates, and selection of surgical approaches (Q3, Q4, and Q5). Interrater reliability was low for both models (ChatGPT: k = 0.041, p = 0.622; Bard: k = -0.040, p = 0.601). While both scored well on understanding and empathy, Bard received marginally lower ratings in empathy and professionalism. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT3.5 and Bard effectively answered lumbar spine fusion FAQs, but further training and research are needed to solidify LLMs' role in medical education and healthcare communication.

Application of deep UV resonance Raman spectroscopy to column liquid chromatography: Development of a low-flow method for the identification of active pharmaceutical ingredients.

In this study, deep UV resonance Raman spectroscopy (DUV-RRS) was coupled with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to be applied in the field of pharmaceutical analysis. Naproxen, Metformin and Epirubicin were employed as active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) covering different areas of the pharmacological spectrum. Raman signals were successfully generated and attributed to the test substances, even in the presence of the dominant solvent bands of the mobile phase. To increase sensitivity, a low-flow method was developed to extend the exposure time of the sample. This approach enabled the use of a deep UV pulse laser with a low average power of 0.5 mW. Compared to previous studies, where energy-intensive argon ion lasers were commonly used, we were able to achieve similar detection limits with our setup. Using affordable lasers with low operating costs may facilitate the transfer of the results of this study into practical applications.