Hodgkin lymphoma in the elderly: a clinical review of treatment and outcome, past, present and future.

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a curable cancer in the vast majority of patients under the age of 60 years. Because of the rarity of the disease in older people, and age related factors such as co-morbidity, inability to tolerate aggressive chemotherapy, poor ECOG status at presentation and issues relating to frailty, the literature is sparse and no prospective randomised studies exist. The incidence of HL in the over 60s range between 10% and 20% of the disease overall and, as a potentially curable cancer, new specific treatment approaches designed for the elderly are necessary. This review discusses the available data in relation to treatments and outcome to date, and proposes how future studies and evaluations might be constructed for this disease. The SHIELD study (Study of Hodgkin lymphoma in the Elderly/Lymphoma Database) is a current example of an approach aimed at objectively defining some of the difficulties of this patient population.

Assessment of male fertility in patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma treated in the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Infertility is one of the most significant side-effects in long-term survivors of successfully treated Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The fertility status was assessed in male HL patients enrolled into trials of the German Hodgkin Study Group from 1988 to 2003. RESULTS: In pre-treatment analysis (n = 202), 20% of patients had normozoospermia, 11% azoospermia and 69% had other dyspermia. In post-treatment analysis (n = 112), 64% of patients had azoospermia, 30% other dyspermia and 6% normozoospermia (P < 0.001). Azoospermia was observed in 90% of patients treated with chemotherapy alone, 67% of those treated with combined modality and 11% of those treated with radiotherapy alone (P < 0.001). Azoospermia was more frequent after 4x cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone, doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (COPP/ABVD) (91%), 8x bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone (BEACOPP) baseline (93%) and 8x BEACOPP escalated (87%) compared with 2x COPP/ABVD (56%; P = 0.003). There was a statistically significant difference in post-treatment follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels between patients with azoospermia and those with preserved spermatogenesis (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Depending on the treatment received, male HL patients are at high risk of infertility after treatment. FSH might be used as surrogate parameter for male fertility in future studies.

High-dose sequential chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in relapsed and refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a multicenter phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Combination chemotherapy can cure patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), but those who suffer treatment failure or relapse still have a poor prognosis. High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can improve the outcome of these patients. We evaluated an intensified high-dose sequential chemotherapy program with a final myeloablative course. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria were age 18-65 years, histologically proven primary progressive or relapsed aggressive NHL and eligibility for HDCT. The therapy consists of two cycles DHAP: dexamethasone 40 mg (day 1-4), high-dose cytarabine 2 g/m2 12q (day 2), cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (day 51); patients with partial (PR) or complete remission (CR) received cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 (day 37), followed by peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) harvest; methotrexate 8 g/m2 (day 1) plus vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (day 51); and etoposide 500 mg/m2 (day 58-62). The final myeloblative course was BEAM: cytarabine 200 mg/m2 12q (day 81-84), etoposide 150 mg/m2 12q (day 81-84), melphalan 140 mg/m2 (day 80), carmustin 300 mg/m2 (day 80) followed by PBSCT. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (median age 43 years, range 24-65) were enrolled: 23 (40%) patients were refractory to primary therapy and 34 (60%) patients had relapsed NHL. The response rate (RR) after 2 cycles of DHAP was 72% (9% CR, 63% PR) and at the final evaluation (100 days post transplantation) 43% (32% CR, 11% PR). Toxicity was tolerable. Median follow-up was 25 months (range 1-76 months). Freedom from second failure (FF2F) and overall survival (OS) at 2 years were 25% and 47% for all patients, respectively. FF2F at 2 years for patients with relapse and for patients refractory to primary therapy were 35% and 9% (P=0.0006), respectively. OS at 2 years for patients with relapse and for patients refractory to primary therapy were 58% and 24% (P=0.0044), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that this regimen is feasible, tolerable and effective in patients with relapsed NHL. In contrast, the results in patients with progressive disease are unsatisfactory. This program is currently being modified by addition of rituximab for patients with relapsed aggressive NHL.

Cologne high-dose sequential chemotherapy in relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: results of a large multicenter study of the German Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group (GHSG).

BACKGROUND: We designed a dose- and time-intensified high-dose sequential chemotherapy regimen for patients with relapsed and refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria included age 18-65 years, histologically proven primary progressive (PD) or relapsed HD. Treatment consisted of two cycles DHAP (dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, cisplatinum); patients with chemosensitive disease received cyclophosphamide followed by peripheral blood stem cell harvest; methotrexate plus vincristine, etoposide and BEAM plus peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). RESULTS: A total of 102 patients (median age 34 years, range 18-64) were enrolled. The response rate was 80% (72% complete response, 8% partial response). With a median follow-up of 30 months (range 3-61 months), freedom from second failure (FF2F) and overall survival (OS) were 59% and 78% for all patients, respectively. FF2F and OS for patients with early relapse were 62% and 81%, for late relapse 65% and 81%; for PD 41% and 48%, and for multiple relapse 39% and 48%, respectively. In multivariate analysis response after DHAP (P <0.0001) and duration of first remission (PD and multiple relapse versus early and late relapse; P=0.0127) were prognostic factors for FF2F. Response after DHAP (P <0.0081), duration of first remission (P=0.0017) and anemia (P=0.019) were significant for OS. CONCLUSION: Based on the promising results of this study, a prospective randomized European intergroup study was started comparing this intensified regimen with two courses of DHAP followed by BEAM (HD-R2 protocol).