Oncologic Outcomes in Young Adults With Kidney Cancer Treated During the Targeted Therapy Era.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the outcomes of young adults with kidney cancer treated during the targeted therapy era and evaluate the impact of young age on survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records from 445 patients younger than 55 years with kidney cancer at a single institution from 2006 to 2017. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the impact of clinical and pathologic variables on all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Overall, 104 (23%) patients 40 years or younger were compared with 341 (77%) patients who were 41 to 55 years old. Younger patients presented with more advanced stages of the disease, including metastasis at diagnosis, positive lymph nodes, venous tumor thrombus and had more non-clear cell tumors (54% vs. 30%; P < .001). Young adults had significantly worse OS at 2 and 5 years (67% vs. 82% and 53% vs. 69%, respectively). Younger patients with metastatic disease received targeted agents less often compared with the older group (64% vs. 75%). There was no difference in recurrence-free survival across patients with localized disease. Independent prognostic factors associated with increased mortality were metastasis at diagnosis, pT2 or greater, and age younger than 40 years (hazard ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-2.6; P = .03). CONCLUSION: Patients younger than 40 years with kidney tumors treated during the targeted therapy era have worse OS compared with older adults. Young age is an independent predictor of mortality.

Robot-assisted extended pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer. When and how?

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature evaluating the role of the extended pelvic lymph node dissectione PLND during robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in the management of PCa patients, as well as the preoperative clinic pathologic factors that predict lymph node metastases (LNM). The technique and current outcomes of robotic ePLND will be presented. METHODS: Medline®/Pubmed® were searched up to august 2018 to find comparative studies of different anatomic limits of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during RARP, open or pure laparoscopic surgery that reported number of nodes retrieved, oncologic outcomes and complications. The search was complemented to identify studies that evaluated diagnostic images and factors that predict LNM. Overall, 44 articles were included for full text review. RESULTS: There is not an imaging technique with an acceptable performance to select patients for PLND, the decision to perform a PLND is based on clinical characteristics described on validated nomograms. Median lymph node yield at RARP range from 5 to 21 depending on the extent of PLND, positivity rate of LN as high as 37% depending on the risk stratification of patients. Robot-assisted can be carried out to any extent with lymph node yields and safety concerns comparable to the open approach. CONCLUSION: Extended pelvic lymph node dissection is recommended to be performed at the time of RARP in intermediate and high-risk patients and cannot be replaced by other modalities. A benefit in terms of oncologic outcomes remains to be established. The robot assisted approach offers shorter length of hospital stay, lower transfusion rates and comparable outcomes compared to other surgical approaches.

ARTICULO SOLO EN INGLES.OBJETIVO: Revisar la literatura que evalúa  el papel de la linfadenectomía pélvica extendida  (LPe) durante la prostatectomía radical asistida por robot  (PRAR) en el manejo de pacientes con cáncer de próstata,  así como los factores clínico-patológicos preoperatorios  que predicen las metástasis ganglionares. Presentamos la técnica de LPe y sus resultados actuales.MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en Medline®/Pubmed® hasta agosto 2018 para encontrar estudios comparativos de los diferentes límites anatómicos de la linfadenectomía pélvica duranteprostatectomía radical asistida por robot, abierta olaparoscópica que comunicaran número de ganglios,resultados oncológicos y complicaciones. La búsquedafue complementada para identificar estudios que evaluaran imágenes diagnósticas y factores predictivos demetástasis ganglionares. Finalmente, se incluyeron 44artículos. RESULTADOS: No hay una técnica de imagen que tengauna resolución aceptable para seleccionar pacientespara linfadenectomía. La decisión de practicar linfadenectomíase basa en las características clínicas descritasen nomogramas validados. La mediana del númerode ganglios obtenidos oscila entre 5 y 21 dependiendode la extensión de la linfadenectomía, y la tasa de gangliospositivos es tan alta como el 37% dependiendo dela estratificación del riesgo de los pacientes. La cirugíaasistida por robot puede realizarse con cualquier extensióncon un número de ganglios obtenidos y aspectosde seguridad comparables con el abordaje abierto. CONCLUSION: Se recomienda realizar la linfadenectomíapélvica extendida en el momento de la PRAR enpacientes de riesgo intermedio y alto y no puede reemplazarsepor otras modalidades. Sigue por establecerseun beneficio en términos de resultados oncológicos. Elabordaje asistido por robot ofrece estancias hospitalariasmás cortas, menores tasas de transfusión y resultadoscomparables en comparación con otros abordajesquirúrgicos.

Robot-assisted extended pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer, when and how? / Linfadenectomía pélvica extendida en cáncer de próstata. ¿Cuándo y cómo?

Objective: To review the literature evaluating the role of the extended pelvic lymph node dissection ePLND during robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in the management of PCa patients, as well as the preoperative clinic pathologic factors that predict lymph node metastases (LNM). The technique and current outcomes of robotic ePLND will be presented. Methods: Medline(R)/Pubmed(R) were searched up to august 2018 to find comparative studies of different anatomic limits of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during RARP, open or pure laparoscopic surgery that reported number of nodes retrieved, oncologic outcomes and complications. The search was complemented to identify studies that evaluated diagnostic images and factors that predict LNM. Overall, 44 articles were included for full text review. Results: There is not an imaging technique with an acceptable performance to select patients for PLND, the decision to perform a PLND is based on clinical characteristics described on validated nomograms. Median lymph node yield at RARP range from 5 to 21 depending on the extent of PLND, positivity rate of LN as high as 37% depending on the risk stratification of patients. Robot-assisted can be carried out to any extent with lymph node yields and safety concerns comparable to the open approach. CONCLUSION: Extended pelvic lymph node dissection is recommended to be performed at the time of RARP in intermediate and high-risk patients and cannot be replaced by other modalities. A benefit in terms of oncologic outcomes remains to be established. The robot assisted approach offers shorter length of hospital stay, lower transfusion rates and comparable outcomes compared to other surgical approaches

Objetivo: Revisar la literatura que evalúa el papel de la linfadenectomía pélvica extendida (LPe) durante la prostatectomía radical asistida por robot (PRAR) en el manejo de pacientes con cáncer de próstata, así como los factores clínico-patológicos preoperatorios que predicen las metástasis ganglionares. Presentamos la técnica de LPe y sus resultados actuales. Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en Medline(R)/Pubmed(R) hasta agosto 2018 para encontrar estudios comparativos de los diferentes límites anatómicos de la linfadenectomía pélvica durante prostatectomía radical asistida por robot, abierta o laparoscópica que comunicaran número de ganglios, resultados oncológicos y complicaciones. La búsqueda fue complementada para identificar estudios que evaluaran imágenes diagnósticas y factores predictivos de metástasis ganglionares. Finalmente, se incluyeron 44 artículos. Resultados: No hay una técnica de imagen que tenga una resolución aceptable para seleccionar pacientes para linfadenectomía. La decisión de practicar linfadenectomía se basa en las características clínicas descritas en nomogramas validados. La mediana del número de ganglios obtenidos oscila entre 5 y 21 dependiendo de la extensión de la linfadenectomía, y la tasa de ganglios positivos es tan alta como el 37% dependiendo de la estratificación del riesgo de los pacientes. La cirugía asistida por robot puede realizarse con cualquier extensión con un número de ganglios obtenidos y aspectos de seguridad comparables con el abordaje abierto. Conclusión: Se recomienda realizar la linfadenectomía pélvica extendida en el momento de la PRAR en pacientes de riesgo intermedio y alto y no puede reemplazarse por otras modalidades. Sigue por establecerse un beneficio en términos de resultados oncológicos. El abordaje asistido por robot ofrece estancias hospitalarias más cortas, menores tasas de transfusión y resultados comparables en comparación con otros abordajes quirúrgicos

Una sola tableta de Abiraterona con comida en vez de 4 tabletas en ayuno para pacientes con cáncer de próstata metastásico resistente a la castración: perspectivas fármaco-económicas en un país en desarrollo / One Pill of Abiraterone with Food Instead of Four Pills in Fasting State for Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients: Pharmaco-economic Perspectives in a Developing Country

Recientemente se publicó en el Journal of Clinical Oncology un estudio prospectivo aleatorizado fase II, que comparó dosis bajas de Abiraterona (250mg) administrada con comida vs la dosis estándar de dicho medicamento (1000mg), en pacientes con cáncer de próstata metastásico resistente a la castración (mCRPC)1 y concluyó que la dosis baja no es inferior a la dosis estándar en cuanto a la respuesta de PSA y a la supervivencia libre de progresión (PFS).

A prospective randomized phase II study comparing low dose Abiraterone (250 mg) administered with food versus the standard dose (1000 mg) in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer, was recently published in The Journal of Clinical Oncology. It concluded that the low dose was non-inferior compared to the standard dose for the endpoints prostate specific antigen (PSA) response and progression free survival (PFS).

Clinical and pathologic factors predicting reclassification in active surveillance cohorts

ABSTRACT The incidence of small, lower risk well-differentiated prostate cancer is increasing and almost half of the patients with this diagnosis are candidates for initial conservative management in an attempt to avoid overtreatment and morbidity associated with surgery or radiation. A proportion of patients labeled as low risk, candidates for Active Surveillance (AS), harbor aggressive disease and would benefit from definitive treatment. The focus of this review is to identify clinicopathologic features that may help identify these less optimal AS candidates. A systematic Medline/PubMed Review was performed in January 2017 according to PRISMA guidelines; 83 articles were selected for full text review according to their relevance and after applying limits described. For patients meeting AS criteria including Gleason Score 6, several factors can assist in predicting those patients that are at higher risk for reclassification including higher PSA density, bilateral cancer, African American race, small prostate volume and low testosterone. Nomograms combining these features improve risk stratification. Clinical and pathologic features provide a significant amount of information for risk stratification (>70%) for patients considering active surveillance. Higher risk patient subgroups can benefit from further evaluation or consideration of treatment. Recommendations will continue to evolve as data from longer term AS cohorts matures.

Clinical and pathologic factors predicting reclassification in active surveillance cohorts.

The incidence of small, lower risk well-differentiated prostate cancer is increasing and almost half of the patients with this diagnosis are candidates for initial conservative management in an attempt to avoid overtreatment and morbidity associated with surgery or radiation. A proportion of patients labeled as low risk, candidates for Active Surveillance (AS), harbor aggressive disease and would benefit from definitive treatment. The focus of this review is to identify clinicopathologic features that may help identify these less optimal AS candidates. A systematic Medline/PubMed Review was performed in January 2017 according to PRISMA guidelines; 83 articles were selected for full text review according to their relevance and after applying limits described. For patients meeting AS criteria including Gleason Score 6, several factors can assist in predicting those patients that are at higher risk for reclassification including higher PSA density, bilateral cancer, African American race, small prostate volume and low testosterone. Nomograms combining these features improve risk stratification. Clinical and pathologic features provide a significant amount of information for risk stratification (>70%) for patients considering active surveillance. Higher risk patient subgroups can benefit from further evaluation or consideration of treatment. Recommendations will continue to evolve as data from longer term AS cohorts matures.