Can cardiac sonography and capnography be used independently and in combination to predict resuscitation outcomes?

OBJECTIVE: To measure the ability of cardiac sonography and capnography to predict survival of cardiac arrest patients in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Nonconsecutive cardiac arrest patients prospectively underwent either cardiac ultrasonography alone or in conjunction with capnography during cardiopulmonary resuscitation at two community hospital EDs with emergency medicine residency programs. Cardiac ultrasonography was carried out using the subxiphoid view during pauses for central pulse evaluation and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO(2)) levels were monitored by a mainstream capnograph. A post-resuscitation data collection form was completed by each of the participating clinicians in order to assess their impressions of the facility of performance and benefit of cardiac sonography during nontraumatic cardiac resuscitation. RESULTS: One hundred two patients were enrolled over a 12-month period. All patients underwent cardiac sonographic evaluation, ranging from one to five scans, during the cardiac resuscitation. Fifty-three patients also had capnography measurements recorded. The presence of sonographically identified cardiac activity at any point during the resuscitation was associated with survival to hospital admission, 11/41 or 27%, in contrast to those without cardiac activity, 2/61 or 3% (p < 0.001). Higher median ETCO(2) levels, 35 torr, were associated with improved chances of survival than the median ETCO(2) levels for nonsurvivors, 13.7 torr (p < 0.01). The multivariate logistic regression model, which evaluated the combination of cardiac ultrasonography and capnography, was able to correctly classify 92.4% of the subjects; however, of the two diagnostic tests, only capnography was a significant predictor of survival. The stepwise logistic regression model, summarized by the area under the receiver operator curve of 0.9, furthermore demonstrated that capnography is an outstanding predictor of survival. CONCLUSIONS: Both the sonographic detection of cardiac activity and ETCO(2) levels higher than 16 torr were significantly associated with survival from ED resuscitation; however, logistic regression analysis demonstrated that prediction of survival using capnography was not enhanced by the addition of cardiac sonography.

Emergency ultrasonography in the evaluation of the acute scrotum.

Acute scrotal pain accounts for approximately 0.5% of total emergency department (ED) visits. Despite this relatively low percentage, these patients can present a considerable challenge to the treating emergency physician (EP) since the etiologies of acute scrotal pain range from organ-threatening disease to minor idiopathic pain. Few data exist on EP use of bedside ultrasound to evaluate scrotal pain, but there is some suggestion that this may represent a beneficial future application for emergency ultrasonographers. This paper briefly describes the technology and technique involved with the performance of testicular ultrasound examination and briefly discusses its potential application at bedside in the ED.

Emergency evaluation of patients presenting with acute scrotum using bedside ultrasonography.

UNLABELLED: Acute scrotal pain is not a rare emergency department (ED) complaint. Traditional reliance on medical history and physical examination can be precarious as signs and symptoms can overlap in various etiologies of acute scrotal pain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy with which emergency physicians (EPs) using bedside ultrasonography are able to evaluate patients presenting to the ED with acute scrotal pain. METHODS: The study was performed at an urban community hospital ED with a residency program and an annual census of 70,000. A retrospective chart review identified 36 patients who presented with complaints of acute scrotal pain and were evaluated by EPs using bedside ultrasound. A 5.0- or 7.5-MHz linear-array transducer with color and power Doppler capability was used to scan the scrotum. Patients were seen between July 1998 and September 1999. Diagnoses were verified by radiology or surgery. Sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: The EP ultrasound examinations agreed with confirmatory studies for 35 of 36 patients, resulting in a sensitivity of 95% (95% CI = 0.78 to 0.99) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI = 0.72 to 0.99). Diagnoses included three testicular torsions, six cases of epididymitis, four cases of orchitis, one testicular fracture, three hernias, three hydroceles, and 15 normal examinations. One case of epididymitis was misdiagnosed as an epididymal mass. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that EPs using bedside ultrasonography are able to accurately diagnose patients presenting with acute scrotal pain. In addition, they appear able to differentiate between surgical emergencies, such as testicular torsion, and other etiologies.

Do emergency physicians save time when locating a live intrauterine pregnancy with bedside ultrasonography?

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with first-trimester pregnancy complications have a decreased length of stay (LOS) when a live intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) is diagnosed by emergency physicians (EPs). METHODS: This study was performed at an urban community ED with a residency program and an annual census of 65,000. A retrospective chart review from October 1995 to August 1998 identified 1,419 patients who received ultrasound examinations confirming live IUP in the first trimester with pain and/or bleeding. Two hundred seventy-seven of these patients received their ultrasound examinations from EPs; 1, 142 patients received a study from radiology and were not scanned by EPs. The LOSs for the two groups were compared and defined as the time from being placed into a room to discharge from the ED. Significance was determined using a two-tailed t-test. Median times with confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: When patients had a live IUP confirmed by an EP, the median LOS was 21% (59 min) less than those who received an ultrasound examination by radiology (p = 0.0001; 95% CI = 49 min to 1 hr 17 min). When evaluated by time of day, patients who presented after hours (6 PM to 6 AM) and were scanned by EPs spent 28% (1 hr 17 min) less time in the ED (p = 0.0001; 95% CI = 55 min to 1 hr 37 min). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency physicians identifying live IUP with bedside ultrasonography significantly decreased patients' LOSs in the ED. The decrease in LOS was most apparent for patients presenting during evening and nighttime hours.