Obesity is Unlikely to be an Impediment to First-Pass Success During the Intubation of Critically Ill Patients.

Background: Obesity has been described as a potential risk factor for difficult intubation among critically ill patients. Our primary aim was to further elucidate the association between obesity and first-pass success. Our secondary aim was to determine whether the use of hyper-angulated video laryngoscopy improves first-pass success compared to direct laryngoscopy when utilized for the intubation of critically ill obese patients. Study Design and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of adult patients undergoing endotracheal intubation outside of the operating room or emergency department between January 30, 2016 and May 1, 2020 at 3 campuses of an academic hospital system in the Bronx, NY. Our primary outcome was first-pass success of intubation. A multivariate logistic analysis was utilized to compare obesity status with first-pass success. Results: We identified 3791 critically ill patients who underwent endotracheal intubation of which 1417 were obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30). The incidence of hyper-angulated video laryngoscopy increased over the study period. A total of 46.6% of obese patients underwent intubation with hyper-angulated video laryngoscopy as compared to 35.1% of the nonobese group. First-pass success was 79.2% among the entire cohort. Obesity status did not appear to be associated with first-pass success (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 090-1.27; P = .47). Hyper-angulated video laryngoscopy did not seem to improve first-pass success among obese patients as compared to nonobese patients (adjusted OR 1.21, 95% CI: 0.85-1.71; P = .29). These findings persisted even after redefining the obesity cutoff as BMI ≥ 40 and excluding patients intubated during cardiac arrests. Conclusion: We did not detect an association between obesity and first-pass success. Hyper-angulated video laryngoscopy did not appear offer additional benefit over direct laryngoscopy during the intubation of critically ill obese patients.

Assessing a standardized decision-making algorithm for blood culture collection in the intensive care unit.

PURPOSE: Blood cultures are commonly ordered for patients with low risk of bacteremia. Indications for obtaining blood cultures are often broad and ill defined, and decision algorithms for appropriate blood cultures have not been comprehensively evaluated in critically-ill populations. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis to assess the frequency of inappropriate blood cultures in the ICUs at Montefiore Medical Center based on an evidence-based guidance algorithm. Blood cultures were reviewed against this algorithm to determine their appropriateness. We calculated the prevalence of inappropriate blood culture and explored the reasons for these collected cultures. RESULTS: 300 patients were randomly selected from an initial cohort of 3370 patients. 294 patients were included and of these, 167 patients had at least 1 blood culture drawn. 125 patients had one or more inappropriate blood culture. 61.4% of blood cultures drawn were assessed to be inappropriate. The most common reason for inappropriate cultures was a culture drawn as a result of isolated fever or leukocytosis. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of critically-ill patients, inappropriate blood cultures were common. The indications for blood cultures are often not evidence-based, and evidence-based algorithms to guide the collection of blood cultures may offer a way to decrease inappropriate culture orders.