Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Fam Med ; 21(Suppl 2): S22-S30, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36849470

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The Teaming and Integrating for Smiles and Health (TISH) Learning Collaborative was developed to help health care organizations accelerate progress in integrating delivery of oral and primary care. By providing expert support and a structure for testing change, the project aimed to improve the early detection of hypertension in the dental setting and of gingivitis in the primary care setting, and to increase the rate of bidirectional referrals between oral and primary care partners. We report its outcomes. METHODS: A total of 17 primary and oral health care teams were recruited to participate in biweekly virtual calls over 3 months. Participants tested changes to their models of care through Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles between calls. Sites tracked the percentages of patients screened and referred, completed the TeamSTEPPS (Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety) and Interprofessional Assessment questionnaires, and provided qualitative feedback and updates in storyboard presentations. RESULTS: On average, with implementation of the TISH Learning Collaborative, sites displayed a nonrandom improvement in the percentages of patients screened for hypertension, referred for hypertension, referred to primary care, and referred for gingivitis. Gingivitis screening and referral to oral health care were not markedly improved. Qualitative responses indicated that teams made progress in screening and referral workflows, improved communication between medical and dental partners, and furthered understanding of the connection between primary care and oral care among staff and patients. CONCLUSIONS: The TISH project is evidence that a virtual Learning Collaborative is an accessible and productive avenue to improve interprofessional education, further primary care and oral partnerships, and achieve practical progress in integrated care.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care, Integrated , Gingivitis , Hypertension , Humans , Oral Health , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/therapy , Primary Health Care
2.
Am Fam Physician ; 104(4): 421, 2021 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34652103
3.
FP Essent ; 437: 11-6, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26439393

ABSTRACT

Identifying acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in family medicine settings can be challenging, partly because it is uncommon in office practice and partly because symptoms can be atypical. Initial evaluation includes review of the patient's symptoms, an assessment of risk factors, and an electrocardiogram (ECG). When symptoms are typical, such as chest pain and diaphoresis, patients should be transported rapidly by emergency medical services (EMS) to the nearest emergency department. If not contraindicated, aspirin and nitroglycerin should be administered before transport. Oxygen should be administered if hypoxemia is present. Patients with atypical symptoms and ECG results consistent with ACS also should be transported by EMS. When patients have atypical symptoms and nondiagnostic ECG results, consider risk factors for ACS. These include older age; female sex; nonwhite race; and history of heart failure, stroke, diabetes, or hypertension. If any of these risk factors is present and there is concern about ACS, the patient should be transported to an emergency department. Family practices in remote or rural areas are not always able to easily transport patients to emergency departments. These remote or rural practices should have ECG capabilities and consider acquiring the ability to obtain point-of-care troponin assays.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome , Transportation of Patients , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Adult , Aged , Chest Pain , Electrocardiography , Emergency Medical Services , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction
4.
FP Essent ; 437: 17-22, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26439394

ABSTRACT

Patients with chest pain who present to emergency departments have a significantly higher incidence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) than patients with chest pain presenting to outpatient settings, so emergency department clinicians should have a lower threshold for considering ACS as an etiology. Evaluating patients with suspected ACS in the emergency department involves obtaining a history, physical examination, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and cardiac troponin measurements in conjunction with risk calculators. These parameters cannot be used individually because, for example, a normal ECG result does not exclude ACS and troponin levels can be elevated in many conditions. All patients with suspected ACS should receive aspirin, if not contraindicated, as soon as possible. Those with an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or those without STEMI who are in unstable condition should be triaged to undergo reperfusion therapy, typically via percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), within 120 minutes of first medical contact. If that time limit cannot be met because the patient must be transferred to a PCI-capable facility, fibrinolytic therapy should be initiated within 30 minutes of presentation if STEMI is present. (Fibrinolytic therapy is contraindicated for myocardial infarction without STEMI.) Patients also should receive nitroglycerin to relieve angina and beta blockers if not contraindicated.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Emergency Service, Hospital , Acute Coronary Syndrome/complications , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Chest Pain/etiology , Electrocardiography , Humans , Myocardial Infarction , Troponin/blood
5.
FP Essent ; 437: 23-32, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26439395

ABSTRACT

The first step in inpatient management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is determining whether the patient has ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). For STEMI, the initial approach to management is cardiac catheterization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to reperfuse the blocked artery; PCI should take place within 120 minutes of first medical contact. However, if no contraindications are present, fibrinolytic therapy is preferred if PCI will take more than 120 minutes. In ACS without STEMI, cardiac catheterization with PCI is the recommended approach for patients who are unstable, and for stable patients with high risk assessment scores, diabetes or renal insufficiency, stent placement within the past 6 months, or prior bypass surgery. Treatment of patients with ACS who do not meet the previously discussed criteria can be noninvasive when troponin levels are not elevated, no ST-segment elevations or depressions are present on electrocardiogram, and risk assessment scores are low. Assuming no contraindications exist, all patients with or without STEMI should receive medical therapy that includes nitroglycerin, antiplatelet agents, anticoagulants, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, aldosterone blockade if left ventricular function is impaired, beta blockers, and statins.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Inpatients , Cardiac Catheterization , Electrocardiography , Humans , Myocardial Infarction , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage
6.
FP Essent ; 437: 33-43, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26439396

ABSTRACT

When providing care for patients who are discharged from the hospital after experiencing acute coronary syndrome (ACS), several issues should be addressed. Drug regimens should be reviewed to ensure that patients are taking appropriate drugs, including antiplatelet agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, aldosterone antagonists, beta blockers/calcium channel blockers, cholesterol-lowering drugs, and nitroglycerin. The review also should confirm that patients understand when and how to take their drugs, and that there are no obstacles (eg, cost) that might result in nonadherence to drug regimens. Lifestyle modifications, including improvements in diet and exercise regimens, along with participation in a cardiac rehabilitation program, should be encouraged. Risk factor reduction measures include smoking cessation for smokers, weight management for patients who are overweight, and optimal control of blood pressure and blood glucose levels. Appropriate vaccinations should be administered; influenza and pneumococcal vaccines are indicated for all patients with ACS in the absence of contraindications. Patients requiring pain control should avoid use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs because they increase the risk of cardiovascular events; acetaminophen or other drugs should be used. Finally, depression is common among patients with ACS. Screening for and management of depression are significant components of care.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/drug therapy , Outpatients , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Humans , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...