Relative influence of environmental factors and fishing on coral reef fish assemblages.

Understanding whether assemblages of species respond more strongly to bottom-up (availability of trophic resources or habitats) or top-down (predation pressure) processes is important for effective management of resources and ecosystems. We determined the relative influence of environmental factors and predation by humans in shaping the density, biomass, and species richness of 4 medium-bodied (10-40 cm total length [TL]) coral reef fish groups targeted by fishers (mesopredators, planktivores, grazer and detritivores, and scrapers) and the density of 2 groups not targeted by fishers (invertivores, small fish ≤10 cm TL) in the central Philippines. Boosted regression trees were used to model the response of each fish group to 21 predictor variables: 13 habitat variables, 5 island variables, and 3 fishing variables (no-take marine reserve [NTMR] presence or absence, NTMR size, and NTMR age). Targeted and nontargeted fish groups responded most strongly to habitat variables, then island variables. Fishing (NTMR) variables generally had less influence on fish groups. Of the habitat variables, live hard coral cover, structural complexity or habitat complexity index, and depth had the greatest effects on density, biomass, and species richness of targeted fish groups and on the density of nontargeted fishes. Of the island variables, proximity to the nearest river and island elevation had the most influence on fish groups. The NTMRs affected only fishes targeted by fishers; NTMR size positively correlated with density, biomass, and species richness of targeted fishes, particularly mesopredatory, and grazing and detritivorous fishes. Importantly, NTMRs as small as 15 ha positively affected medium-bodied fishes. This finding provides reassurance for regions that have invested in small-scale community-managed NTMRs. However, management strategies that integrate sound coastal land-use practices to conserve adjacent reef fish habitat, strategic NTMR placement, and establishment of larger NTMRs will be crucial for maintaining biodiversity and fisheries.

Influencia Relativa de los Factores Ambientales y la Pesca sobre el Ensamblaje de Peces en los Arrecifes de Coral Resumen Es importante entender si el ensamblaje de especies responde con mayor fuerza al proceso de abajo-arriba (disponibilidad de recursos tróficos o hábitats) o al de arriba-abajo (presión de depredadores) para el manejo efectivo de los recursos y los ecosistemas. Determinamos la influencia relativa de los factores ambientales y la depredación humana en la configuración de la densidad, la biomasa y la riqueza de especies de cuatro peces de arrecife de coral con un tamaño corporal mediano (10-40 cm de longitud total [LT]) que son preferidos por los pescadores (mesodepredadores, planctívoros, forrajeros y detritívoros, y raspadores) y también determinamos la densidad de dos grupos que no son blanco de los pescadores (invertívoros y peces de talla pequeña ≤10 cm LT) en la región central de las Filipinas. Usamos árboles de regresión amplificados para modelar la respuesta de cada grupo de peces a 21 variables de predicción: trece variables de hábitat, cinco variables de isla y tres variables de pesca (ausencia o presencia de una reserva marina vedada [RMV], tamaño y antigüedad de la NTMR). Los grupos de peces preferidos y no preferidos por los pescadores respondieron con mayor fuerza a las variables de hábitat que a las variables de isla. Las variables de pesca (RMV) en general tuvieron una menor influencia sobre los grupos de peces. De las variables de hábitat, la cobertura de coral duro vivo, la complejidad estructural o el índice de complejidad del hábitat y la profundidad tuvieron el mayor efecto sobre la densidad, la biomasa y la riqueza de especies de los peces preferidos por los pescadores y sobre la densidad de los peces no preferidos por los pescadores. De las variables de isla, la proximidad al río más cercano y la elevación de la isla tuvieron la mayor influencia sobre los grupos de peces. Las RMVs afectaron sólo a los peces preferidos por los pescadores; el tamaño de la NTMR tuvo una correlación positiva con la densidad, la biomasa y la riqueza de especies de los peces preferidos por los pescadores, particularmente los peces mesodepredadores, forrajeros y detritívoros. De manera importante, las RMVs con un tamaño mínimo de 15 ha afectaron positivamente a los peces de talla mediana. Este hallazgo proporciona seguridad para las regiones que han invertido en RMVs de pequeña escala y manejadas por la comunidad. Sin embargo, las estrategias de manejo que integran prácticas firmes de uso de suelo costero para conservar el hábitat adyacente de peces, la ubicación estratégica de RMV y el establecimiento de RMVs más grandes serán cruciales para el mantenimiento de la biodiversidad y las pesquerías.

Non-reef habitats in a tropical seascape affect density and biomass of fishes on coral reefs.

Nonreef habitats such as mangroves, seagrass, and macroalgal beds are important for foraging, spawning, and as nursery habitat for some coral reef fishes. The spatial configuration of nonreef habitats adjacent to coral reefs can therefore have a substantial influence on the distribution and composition of reef fish. We investigate how different habitats in a tropical seascape in the Philippines influence the presence, density, and biomass of coral reef fishes to understand the relative importance of different habitats across various spatial scales. A detailed seascape map generated from satellite imagery was combined with field surveys of fish and benthic habitat on coral reefs. We then compared the relative importance of local reef (within coral reef) and adjacent habitat (habitats in the surrounding seascape) variables for coral reef fishes. Overall, adjacent habitat variables were as important as local reef variables in explaining reef fish density and biomass, despite being fewer in number in final models. For adult and juvenile wrasses (Labridae), and juveniles of some parrotfish taxa (Chlorurus), adjacent habitat was more important in explaining fish density and biomass. Notably, wrasses were positively influenced by the amount of sand and macroalgae in the adjacent seascape. Adjacent habitat metrics with the highest relative importance were sand (positive), macroalgae (positive), and mangrove habitats (negative), and fish responses to these metrics were consistent across fish groups evaluated. The 500-m spatial scale was selected most often in models for seascape variables. Local coral reef variables with the greatest importance were percent cover of live coral (positive), sand (negative), and macroalgae (mixed). Incorporating spatial metrics that describe the surrounding seascape will capture more holistic patterns of fish-habitat relationships on reefs. This is important in regions where protection of reef fish habitat is an integral part of fisheries management but where protection of nonreef habitats is often overlooked.