Highest 3-month international normalized ratio (INR): a predictor of bleeding following ultrasound-guided liver biopsy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether international normalized ratio (INR), bilirubin, and creatinine predict bleeding risk following percutaneous liver biopsy. METHODS: A total of 870 consecutive patients (age 53 ± 14 years; 53% (459/870) male) undergoing non-targeted, ultrasound-guided, percutaneous liver biopsy at a single tertiary center from 01/2016 to 12/2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression models to evaluate the relationship between individual and combined laboratory values, and post-biopsy bleeding risk. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under ROC (AUC) curves were constructed to evaluate predictive ability. RESULTS: Post-biopsy bleeding occurred in 2.0% (17/870) of patients, with 0.8% (7/870) requiring intervention. The highest INR within 3 months preceding biopsy demonstrated the best predictive ability for post-biopsy bleeding and was superior to the most recent INR (AUC = 0.79 vs 0.61, p = 0.003). Total bilirubin is an independent predictor of bleeding (AUC = 0.73) and better than the most recent INR (0.61). Multivariate regression analysis of the highest INR and total bilirubin together yielded no improvement in predictive performance compared to INR alone (0.80 vs 0.79). The MELD score calculated using the highest INR (AUC = 0.79) and most recent INR (AUC = 0.74) were similar in their predictive performance. Creatinine is a poor predictor of bleeding (AUC = 0.61). Threshold analyses demonstrate an INR of > 1.8 to have the highest predictive accuracy for bleeding. CONCLUSION: The highest INR in 3 months preceding ultrasound-guided percutaneous liver biopsy is associated with, and a better predictor for, post-procedural bleeding than the most recent INR and should be considered in patient risk stratification. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Despite correction of coagulopathic indices, the highest international normalized ratio within the 3 months preceding percutaneous liver biopsy is associated with, and a better predictor for, bleeding and should considered in clinical decision-making and determining biopsy approach. KEY POINTS: • Bleeding occurred in 2% of patients following ultrasound-guided liver biopsy, and was non-trivial in 41% of those patients who needed additional intervention and had an associated 23% 30-day mortality rate. • The highest INR within 3 months preceding biopsy (AUC = 0.79) is a better predictor of bleeding than the most recent INR (AUC = 0.61). • The MELD score is associated with post-procedural bleeding, but with variable predictive performance largely driven by its individual laboratory components.

Safety profile and technical success of narrow window CT-guided percutaneous biopsy with blunt needle approach in the abdomen and pelvis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess success and safety of CT-guided procedures with narrow window access for biopsy. METHODS: Three hundred ninety-six consecutive patients undergoing abdominal or pelvic CT-guided biopsy or fiducial placement between 01/2015 and 12/2018 were included (183 women, mean age 63 ±â€¯14 years). Procedures were classified into "wide window" (width of the needle path between structures > 15 mm) and "narrow window" (≤ 15 mm) based on intraprocedural images. Clinical information, complications, technical and clinical success, and outcomes were collected. The blunt needle approach is preferred by our interventional radiology team for narrow window access. RESULTS: There were 323 (81.5%) wide window procedures and 73 (18.5%) narrow window procedures with blunt needle approach. The median depth for the narrow window group was greater (97 mm, interquartile range (IQR) 82-113 mm) compared to the wide window group (84 mm, IQR 60-106 mm); p = 0.0017. Technical success was reached in 100% (73/73) of the narrow window and 99.7% (322/323) of the wide window procedures. There was no difference in clinical success rate between the two groups (narrow: 86.4%, 57/66; wide: 89.5%, 265/296; p = 0.46). There was no difference in immediate complication rate (narrow: 1.3%, 1/73; wide: 1.2%, 4/323; p = 0.73) or delayed complication rate (narrow: 1.3%, 1/73; wide: 0.6%, 1/323; p = 0.50). CONCLUSION: Narrow window (< 15 mm) access biopsy and fiducial placement with blunt needle approach under CT guidance is safe and successful. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: CT-guided biopsy and fiducial placement can be performed through narrow window access of less than 15 mm utilizing the blunt-tip technique. KEY POINTS: • A narrow window for CT-guided abdominal and pelvic biopsies and fiducial placements was considered when width of the needle path between vital structures was ≤ 15 mm. • Seventy-three biopsies and fiducial placements performed through a narrow window with blunt needle approach had a similar rate of technical and clinical success and complications compared to 323 procedures performed through a wide window approach, with traditional approach (> 15 mm). • This study confirmed the safety of the CT-guided percutaneous procedures through < 15 mm window with blunt-tip technique.

Peer learning in abdominal radiology: iterative process improvements over a 20-year experience.

PURPOSE: After a slow and challenging transition period, peer learning and improvement (PLI) is now being more widely adopted by practices as an option for continuous personal and practice performance improvement. In addition to gaps that exist in the understanding of what PLI is and how it should be practiced, wide variation exists in how the process is implemented, administered, how outcomes are measured, and what strategies are employed to engage radiologists. This report aims to describe lessons learned from our 20-year experience with the design, implementation, and continuous improvements of a PLI program in a large academic program. METHODS: Since initial implementation in 2004, an oversight team prospectively documented iterative process improvements and data submission trends in our PLI process. Process data included strategies for engaging radiologists in the PLI process (fostering case submission, PLI meeting participation), steps for achieving regulatory compliance, and template content for facilitating the value and impact of PLI meetings (case analysis, review of contributing factors, identification of improvement opportunities). RESULTS: Submission trends, submitted case content, and improvement opportunities varied by clinical section. Process improvements that fostered engagement included closing the loop with participants, expanding criteria for case submission beyond interpretive disagreements (e.g., great pickups, near misses), minimizing impacts to workflow, and using evidence-based templates for case and contributor categorization, bias analysis, and identification of improvement opportunities. CONCLUSION: Implementing an effective PLI program requires sustained communication, education, and continuous process improvement. While PLI can certainly lead to process and individual performance improvement, the program requires trained champions, designated time, effort, resources, education, and patience to be effectively implemented.

Routine radiology-pathology concordance evaluation of CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsies increases the number of cancers identified.

BACKGROUND: Routine concordance evaluation between pathology and imaging findings was introduced for CT-guided biopsies. PURPOSE: To analyze malignancy rate in concordant, discordant, and indeterminate non-malignant results of CT-guided lung biopsies. METHODS: Concordance between pathology results and imaging findings of consecutive patients undergoing CT-guided lung biopsy between 7/1/2016 and 9/30/2021 was assessed during routine meetings by procedural radiologists. Concordant was defined as pathology consistent with imaging findings; discordant was used when pathology could not explain imaging findings; indeterminate when pathology could explain imaging findings but there was concern for malignancy. Recommendations for discordant and indeterminate were provided. All the malignant results were concordant. Pathology of repeated biopsy, surgical sample, or follow-up was considered reference standard. RESULTS: Consecutive 828 CT-guided lung biopsies were performed on 795 patients (median age 70 years, IQR 61-77), 423/828 (51%) women. On pathology, 224/828 (27%) were non-malignant. Among the non-malignant, radiology-pathology concordance determined 138/224 (62%) to be concordant with imaging findings, 54/224 (24%) discordant, and 32/224 (14%) indeterminate. When compared to the reference standard, 33/54 (61%) discordant results, 6/30 (20%) indeterminate, and 3/133 (2%) concordant were malignant. The prevalence of malignancy in the three groups was significantly different (p < 0.001). Time to diagnosis was significantly different between patients who reached the diagnosis with imaging follow-up (median 114 days, IQR 69-206) compared to repeat biopsy (33 days, IQR 18-133) (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Routine radiology-pathology concordance evaluation of CT-guided lung biopsy correctly identifies patients at high risk for missed diagnosis of malignancy. Repeat biopsy is the fastest method to reach diagnosis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: A routine radiology-pathology concordance assessment identifies patients with non-malignant CT-guided lung biopsy result who are at greater risk of missed diagnosis of malignancy. KEY POINTS: • A routine radiology-pathology concordance evaluation of CT-guided lung biopsies classified 224 non-malignant results as concordant, discordant, or indeterminate. • The percentage of malignancy on follow-up was significantly different in concordant (2%), discordant (61%), and indeterminate (20%) (p < 0.001). • Time to definitive diagnosis was significantly shorter with repeat biopsy (33 days), compared to imaging follow-up (114 days), p = 0.01.

Summary of the 2022 ACR Intersociety Meeting.

The ACR Intersociety Committee meeting of 2022 (ISC-2022) was convened around the theme of "Recovering From The Great Resignation, Moral Injury and Other Stressors: Rebuilding Radiology for a Robust Future." Representatives from 29 radiology organizations, including all radiology subspecialties, radiation oncology, and medical physics, as well as academic and private practice radiologists, met for 3 days in early August in Park City, Utah, to search for solutions to the most pressing problems facing the specialty of radiology in 2022. Of these, the mismatch between the clinical workload and the available radiologist workforce was foremost-as many other identifiable problems flowed downstream from this, including high job turnover, lack of time for teaching and research, radiologist burnout, and moral injury.

Moral Distress in Radiology: Frequency, Root Causes, and Countermeasures-Results of a National Survey.

BACKGROUND. A major cause of burnout is moral distress: when one knows the right course of action but institutional constraints make the right course impossible to pursue. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the frequency and severity with which radiologists experience moral distress and to explore moral distress's root causes and countermeasures. METHODS. This study entailed a national survey that evaluated moral distress in radiology. The survey incorporated the validated Moral Distress Scale for Health Care Professionals, along with additional questions. After the scale was modified for applicability to radiology, respondents were asked to assess 16 clinical scenarios in terms of frequency and severity of moral distress. On May 10, 2022, the survey was sent by e-mail to 425 members of radiology practices included on a national radiology society's quality-and-safety LISTSERV. The Measure of Moral Distress for Health Care Professionals (MMD-HP) score was calculated for each respondent as a summary measure of distress across scenarios (maximum possible score, 256). RESULTS. After 12 surveys with incomplete data were excluded, the final analysis included 93 of 425 respondents (22%). A total of 91 of 93 respondents (98%) experienced at least some moral distress for at least one scenario. A total of 17 of 93 respondents (18%) had left a clinical position due to moral distress; 26 of 93 (28%) had considered leaving a clinical position due to moral distress but did not leave. The mean MMD-HP score was 73 ± 51 (SD) for those who had left, 89 ± 47 for those who had considered leaving but did not leave, and 39 ± 35 for those who had never considered leaving (p < .001). A total of 41 of 85 respondents (48%) thought that the COVID-19 pandemic had influenced their moral distress level. Across respondents, the three scenarios with highest moral distress were related to systemic causes (higher case volume than could be read safely, high case volume preventing teaching residents, and lack of administrative action or support). The countermeasure most commonly selected to alleviate moral distress was educating leadership about sources of moral distress (71%). CONCLUSION. Moral distress is prevalent in radiology, typically relates to systemic causes, and is a reported contributor to radiologists changing jobs. CLINICAL IMPACT. Urgent action by radiology practice leadership is required to address moral distress, as radiologists commonly practice in environments contradictory to their core values as physicians.

Factors Affecting Adherence to Outpatient Radiology Report Recommendations.

PURPOSE: To identify factors associated with adherence to radiology follow-up recommendations by the referring physicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, CT, ultrasound, and MRI reports with the keyword "recommend" and synonyms between March 11, 2019, and March 29, 2019, were included. Emergency department and inpatient examinations and routine surveillance recommendations, such as lung nodules, were excluded. Performance of follow-up examinations was correlated with the strength of recommendation, conditionality of recommendation, direct communication of results to ordering provider, and history of cancer. Outcomes included adherence to recommendations and time to follow-up. Statistical comparison between groups was performed using χ2, Kruskal-Wallis, and Spearman correlation. RESULTS: Qualifying recommendations were provided in 255 reports (age 60.1 ± 16.5 years, female: 151 of 255, 59.22%). Imaging follow-up was performed in 166 of 255 (65%) reports: 148 of 166 (89.15%) nonconditional versus 18 of 166 (10.48%) conditional recommendations (P = .008), and more frequently in the patients with a strong follow-up recommendation (138 of 166 [83.13%], versus 28 of 166 [16.86%]) (P = .009). The median time to follow-up was 28 days versus 82 days in patients without versus with a history of cancer (P = .00057), 28 days versus 70 days with direct communication with the provider versus without (P = .0069), 82.5 versus 21 days for reports in which a specific follow-up interval was provided (86 of 255, 33.72%) versus those without (169 of 255, 66.27%) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The adherence rate for radiological nonroutine recommendations was 65%. Reports with strongly worded and nonconditional follow-up recommendations were followed more frequently. Direct communication with providers, patients without a known cancer history, and recommendations with no specified time interval identified were followed up earlier. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Strongly worded and nonconditional follow-up recommendations increase the likelihood of follow-up being performed. Direct communication of imaging follow-up recommendations to the provider and lack of specific time intervals decreases the median time to follow-up, which in turn may decrease the delay in medical care.

Outcomes of Postprocedural Closeout Checklist Implementation to Prevent Adverse Events during Interventional Radiology Procedures: An Initiative to Improve Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To assess whether adherence to a postprocedural closeout (PPC) checklist decreases adverse events during image-guided procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the analysis of prior adverse events related to image-guided procedures, the Radiology Quality Committee developed a PPC checklist. The rates of serious reportable events related to image-guided procedures performed in the radiology department were recorded annually from 2015 to 2021. The rate of adverse events was normalized to the procedure volume in the corresponding periods. The number of patients requiring repeat procedures was recorded. The severity of impact was classified according to the Society of Interventional Radiology Adverse Event Classification System. The annual rates before (2015 and 2016) and after (2017-2021) the implementation of PPC were compared. RESULTS: Seventy-seven safety reports were identified in image-guided procedures over the study period, of which 43 cases were not related to the PPC, leaving 34 cases for the analysis. Radiology adverse events decreased from 0.069% (14/20,218, 7/y) before PPC implementation to 0.034% (20/58,793, 4/y) after implementation (P = .05, 43% decrease). Radiology repeat procedures decreased from 0.040% (8/20,218, 4/y) before PPC implementation to 0.007% (4/58,793, 0.8/y) after implementation (P = .0033, 80% decrease). Moreover, severity of adverse events decreased (P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a PPC checklist improved patient outcomes by decreasing the number of adverse events that occur from inadequate safety processes at the end of image-guided procedures by 43%, need for repeat procedures by 80%, and severity of impact of errors.

Is routine imaging necessary prior to percutaneous abscess catheter removal?

BACKGROUND: Routine management after abscess drainage includes CT or fluoroscopic imaging to assess for residual abscess cavity prior to catheter removal. It is unclear whether this practice is necessary in patients without residual infection signs and symptoms. PURPOSE: To evaluate safety of abscess catheter removal without follow-up imaging in patients without residual clinical or laboratory signs of infection and catheter output < 10 cc/day for 2 consecutive days. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this IRB-approved, HIPAA compliant, retrospective study, consecutive patients that underwent percutaneous CT-guided drainage of a single abdominal or pelvic abscess between 01/2015 and 12/2017 in a single tertiary academic institution with or without follow-up imaging prior to catheter removal were included. In our institution, catheters are routinely removed without imaging if there are no clinical (fever, pain) or laboratory (elevated WBC count) signs of infection and catheter output is < 10 cc/day for 2 consecutive days. Patients' and abscess's characteristics, repeat imaging data, and need for re-interventions were obtained through medical records review. Statistical analysis was performed with Fisher's exact test for independent data and Student's t-test for comparison of group means. RESULTS: 310 consecutive patients (age 56 ± 16 years, 48% female) were included in the study. In 265/310 (85%) patients, no routine follow-up imaging prior to catheter removal was obtained. In 2/265 (0.8%, 95% CI 0.02-0.27%) patients without routine pre-removal imaging, repeat abscess drainage was required 6 and 15 days after catheter removal in patient with perforated appendicitis and after laparoscopic renal cyst decortication, respectively. No patients, 0/45 (0%, 95% CI 0-0.07), that underwent routine imaging without clinical or laboratory signs infection needed to undergo a repeat abscess drainage. CONCLUSION: There is a low rate (0.8%) of abscess recurrence if percutaneous abscess catheter is removed at the time cessation of drainage without routine imaging in clinically well patient.

Emotional Harm in the Radiology Department: Analysis of an Underrecognized Preventable Error.

Background Emotional harm incidents in health care may result in lost trust and adverse outcomes. However, investigations of emotional harm in radiology departments remain lacking. Purpose To better understand contributors and clinical scenarios in which emotional harm can occur in radiology, to document incidences, and to develop preventative countermeasures. Materials and Methods A large tertiary hospital adverse event reporting system was retrospectively searched for submissions under the category of dignity and respect in radiology between December 2014 and December 2020. Submissions were assigned to one of 14 categories per a previously developed classification system. Root-cause analysis of events was performed with a focus on countermeasures for future prevention. The person experiencing emotional harm (patient or staff) was noted. Results Of all radiology-related submissions, 37 of 3032 (1.2%) identified 43 dignity and respect incidents: failure to be patient centered (n = 23; 54%), disrespectful communication (n = 16; 37%), privacy violation (n = 2; 5%), minimization of patient concerns (n = 1; 2%), and loss of property (n = 1; 2%). Failure to be patient centered (n = 23) was subcategorized into disregard for patient preference (12 of 23; 52%), delay in care (eight of 23; 35%), and ineffective communication (three of 23; 13%). Of the 43 incidents, 32 involved patients (74%) and 11 involved staff (26%). Emotional harm in staff was because of disrespectful communication from other staff (eight of 11; 73%). Seventy-three countermeasures were identified: staff communication training (n = 32; 44%), individual feedback (n = 18; 25%), system innovation (n = 16; 22%), improvement of existing communication processes (n = 3; 4%), process reminders (n = 3; 4%), and unclear (n = 1; 1%). Individual feedback and staff communication training that focused on active listening, asking for the patient's preferences, and closed-loop communication addressed 34 of the 43 incidents (79%). Conclusion Most emotional harm incidents were from disrespectful communication and failure to be patient centered. Providing training focused on active listening, asking for patient's preferences, and closed-loop communication would potentially prevent most of these incidents. © RSNA, 2021 See also the editorial by Bruno in this issue.

Concordance Assessment of Pathology Results with Imaging Findings after Image-Guided Biopsy.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of radiology review for discordance between pathology results from computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsies versus imaging findings performed before a biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective review, which is compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and approved by the institutional review board, 926 consecutive CT-guided biopsies performed between January 2015 and December 2017 were included. In total, 453 patients were presented in radiology review meetings (prospective group), and the results were classified as concordant or discordant. Results from the remaining 473 patients not presented at the radiology review meetings were retrospectively classified. Times to reintervention and to definitive diagnosis were obtained for discordant cases; of these, 49 (11%) of the 453 patients were in the prospective group and 55 (12%) of the 473 patients in the retrospective group. RESULTS: Pathology results from CT-guided biopsies were discordant with imaging in 11% (104/926) of the cases, with 57% (59/104) of these cases proving to be malignant. In discordant cases, reintervention with biopsy and surgery yielded a shorter time to definitive diagnosis (28 and 14 days, respectively) than an imaging follow-up (78 days) (P < .001). The median time to diagnosis was 41 days in the prospective group and 56 days in the retrospective group (P = .46). When radiologists evaluated the concordance between pathology and imaging findings and recommended a repeat biopsy for the discordant cases, more biopsies were performed (50% [11/22] vs 13% [4/31]; P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Eleven percent of CT-guided biopsies yielded pathology results that were discordant with imaging findings, with 57% of these proving to be malignant on further workup.

Incidental Splenic Findings on Cross-Sectional Imaging.

Incidental splenic focal findings are commonly encountered in clinical practice and frequently represent a diagnostic dilemma due to nonspecific imaging features. Most are benign, particularly in patients without a history of malignancy and without symptoms of fever, weight loss, or left upper quadrant or epigastric pain. Incidental malignant splenic processes are exceedingly rare. This article reviews imaging characteristics of incidental focal splenic findings, and proposes a practical approach for management of such findings, which can prevent unnecessary workup and its related drawbacks in clinical practice.

Safely Shortening the Observation Time After CT-Guided Lung Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To determine safety of shortened observation time without follow-up chest x-ray (CXR) after CT-guided transthoracic procedures (lung biopsy or fiducial placement) in patients without immediate postprocedural pneumothorax (PTX). METHODS: Consecutive patients that underwent CT-guided procedures between January 5, 2015, and June 19, 2017, were included in this retrospective institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant study. Data regarding postprocedural course, complications, and clinical follow-up of the patients were obtained through a review of electronic medical records. Descriptive statistics were used. RESULTS: There were 441 procedures for 409 patients performed; 82 procedures were excluded because of predefined criteria. In 312 of 336 asymptomatic procedures (92.9%), asymptomatic patients did not undergo CXR after procedure, with 7 of 312 of these patients (2.2%) diagnosed with delayed PTX 2 to 10 days after the procedure. In 24 of 336 procedures (7.1%), asymptomatic patients underwent CXR within 4 hours with no PTX detected, and despite that 1 of 24 of these patients (4.2%) presented with delayed PTX 7 days after procedure. When no immediate postprocedural PTX was present, rate of observation PTX and delayed PTX was 1 of 359 (0.3%) and 8 of 359 (2.2%), respectively. Average duration of monitoring for outpatients (n = 295) was 2.0 hours with median of 1.8 hours. In 23 of 359 (6.4%) procedures, the patient became symptomatic during postprocedural observation with 1 of 23 (4%) developing PTX. CONCLUSIONS: Obtaining routine postprocedural CXRs in asymptomatic patients without immediate postprocedural PTX after CT-guided transthoracic procedures is likely not necessary given the low likelihood of PTX.

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Porcelain Gallbladder Diagnosed on CT.

PURPOSE: To evaluate diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcomes of patients with porcelain gallbladder (GB) diagnosed on CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study, consecutive patients with porcelain gallbladder reported on CT between December 1, 2000 and August 31, 2017 in a tertiary academic center were included. Two radiologists independently reviewed CT images and confirmed presence of porcelain gallbladder. Discrepant cases were reviewed by a third reader with 15 years of experience in abdominal imaging. Porcelain gallbladder diagnosis was confirmed by surgery/pathology or follow-up imaging. RESULTS: Porcelain gallbladder was reported in 133 CT studies. Radiologist review and pathology results confirmed porcelain gallbladder in 90/133 (68%) patients (age 71.6 ± 13.8 years, 57% female). One third (42/133; 32%) of CT reports were false positive; 1/133 (1%) remained indeterminate. Frequent pitfalls included: stones filling the whole gallbladder lumen in 39/43 (91%), sludge in 3/43 (7%) and mucosal enhancement in 2/43 (5%). In 5/90 (6%) patients, concurrent gallbladder cancer was noted on the initial CT scan. No patient developed subsequent gallbladder cancer during 6.6 ± 4.6 years of follow-up. One third (30/90, 33%) of patients with porcelain gallbladder have deceased during the follow-up period, all from unrelated causes. CONCLUSION: At the time of presentation with porcelain gallbladder, 6% of patients had concurrent gallbladder cancer. No patient with porcelain gallbladder alone diagnosed on CT developed gallbladder cancer during a follow-up of 6.6 ± 4.6 years. Porcelain gallbladder is overcalled on CT, with frequent pitfalls including gallstones filling the whole gallbladder lumen, sludge, and wall enhancement.

Transitioning From Peer Review to Peer Learning: Report of the 2020 Peer Learning Summit.

Since its introduction nearly 20 years ago, score-based peer review has not been shown to have meaningful impact on or be a valid measurement instrument of radiologist performance. A new paradigm has emerged, peer learning, which is a group activity in which expert professionals review one another's work, actively give and receive feedback in a constructive manner, teach and learn from one another, and mutually commit to improving performance as individuals, as a group, and as a system. Many radiology practices are beginning to transition from score-based peer review to peer learning. To address challenges faced by these practices, a 1-day summit was convened at Harvard Medical School in January 2020, sponsored by the ACR. Several important themes emerged. Elements considered key to a peer-learning program include broad group participation, active identification of learning opportunities, individual feedback, peer-learning conferences, link with process and system improvement activities, preservation of organizational culture, sequestration of peer-learning activities from evaluation mechanisms, and program management. Radiologists and practice leaders are encouraged to develop peer-learning programs tailored to their local practice environment and foster a positive organizational culture. Health system administrators should support active peer-learning programs in the place of score-based peer review. Accrediting organizations should formally recognize peer learning as an acceptable form of peer review and specify minimum criteria for peer-learning programs. IT system vendors should actively collaborate with radiology organizations to develop solutions that support the efficient and effective management of local peer-learning programs.

Dependent lesion positioning at CT-guided lung biopsy to reduce risk of pneumothorax.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of patient positioning during CT-guided lung biopsy on patients' outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective, IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study, consecutive CT-guided lung biopsies performed on 5/1/2015-12/26/2017 were included. Correlation between incidence of pneumothorax, chest tube placement, pulmonary bleeding with patient, and procedure characteristics was evaluated. Lesion-trachea-table angle (LTTA) was defined as an angle between the lesion, trachea, and horizontal line parallel to the table. Lesion above trachea has a positive LTTA. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 423 biopsies in 409 patients (68 ± 11 years, 231/409, 56% female) were included in the study. Pneumothorax occurred in 83/423 (20%) biopsies with chest tube placed in 11/423 (3%) biopsies. Perilesional bleeding occurred in 194/423 (46%) biopsies and hemoptysis in 20/423 (5%) biopsies. Univariate analysis showed an association of pneumothorax with smaller lesions (p = 0.05), positive LTTA (p = 0.002), and lesions not attached to pleura (p = 0.026) with multivariate analysis showing lesion size and LTTA to be independent risk factors. Univariate analysis showed an association of increased pulmonary bleeding with smaller lesions (p < 0.001), no attachment to the pleura (p < 0.001), needle throw < 16 mm (p = 0.05), and a longer needle path (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed lesion size, a longer needle path, and lesions not attached to the pleura to be independently associated with perilesional bleeding. Risk factors for hemoptysis were longer needle path (p = 0.002), no attachment to the pleura (p = 0.03), and female sex (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Interventional radiologists can reduce the pneumothorax risk during the CT-guided biopsy by positioning the biopsy site below the trachea. KEY POINTS: • Positioning patient with lesion to be below the trachea for the CT-guided lung biopsy results in lower rate of pneumothorax, as compared with the lesion above the trachea. • Positioning patient with lesion to be below the trachea for the CT-guided lung biopsy does not affect rate of procedure-associated pulmonary hemorrhage or hemoptysis.

Impact of Preprocedure Time-Out Checklist for Computed Tomography-Guided Procedures on Workflow and Patient Safety.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of preprocedural time-out on workflow and patient safety in computed tomography (CT)-guided procedures. METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study, preprocedure time-out was assessed by an independent observer in CT-guided procedures performed from January 16, 2018, to May 15, 2018. Anonymous survey of 302 radiology team members involved in image-guided procedures about preprocedure time-out was performed using REDCap. RESULTS: Preprocedure time-out for 100 CT-guided procedures (biopsies, drainages, ablations) was observed. Procedures were recruited per observer availability and thus were nonconsecutive and nonrandom. Preprocedure time-out was performed in 100 procedures (100%). Median duration was 60 seconds (interquartile range, 60-71 seconds). Scripted checklist was followed in 52 cases (52/100, 52%). Omissions from the preprocedure time-out were identified in 40 cases (40/100, 40%) and were much more frequent when scripted checklist was not used (30/48 [63%] vs 10/52 [19%], P < 0.005). One case (1/100, 1%) was postponed due to abnormal coagulation parameters discovered during the time-out. Three cases (3/100, 3%) were delayed by 3 minutes to address other safety issues. In additional 14 cases (14/100, 14%), safety issues were raised during the time-out, which were resolved in less than 30 seconds.A total of 137 (45%) of 302 survey responses from 54 radiologists (39%), 55 technologists (40%), and 28 nurses (20%) were received. Forty-eight respondents (48/137, 35%) encountered a procedure that was cancelled or delayed as a result of information identified during time-out. Ninety-six percent (131/137) of respondents stated that time-out improves teamwork, 98% (134/137) stated that it enhances communication between the team members, and 93% (127/137) stated that it identifies and resolves problems and ambiguities. CONCLUSIONS: Scripted preprocedure time-out for CT-guided procedures takes approximately 1 minute to execute and detects safety issues in 18% of cases.

Overcoming Human Barriers to Safety Event Reporting in Radiology.

In high-reliability industries that are dedicated to ensuring safety, safety event reporting is the cornerstone of improvement. However, human factors can interfere with consistent reporting. Common human factors that are barriers to safety event reporting include liability concerns; time constraints; physician autonomy; self-regulation; collegiality; the lack of listening, language training, and/or feedback regarding reported events; unclear responsibilities within safety teams; and a high reporting threshold. Other barriers include fears of challenging authority, being disrespected, retribution, and the creation of a difficult work environment. These factors are reviewed in the health care setting, and the countermeasures that need to be introduced at the frontline employee, leadership employee (physicians and managers), and departmental and organizational levels to create a culture of safety in which all employees feel comfortable raising safety concerns are discussed. ©RSNA, 2019.