Post-therapeutic response evaluation by a combination of endoscopy and CT scan in esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after chemotherapy: better than its reputation.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an accepted standard of care for locally advanced esophagogastric cancer. As only a subgroup benefits, a response-based tailored treatment would be of interest. The aim of our study was the evaluation of the prognostic and predictive value of clinical response in esophagogastric adenocarcinomas. METHODS: Clinical response based on a combination of endoscopy and computed tomography (CT) scan was evaluated retrospectively within a prospective database in center A and then transferred to center B. A total of 686/740 (A) and 184/210 (B) patients, staged cT3/4, cN0/1 underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and were then re-staged by endoscopy and CT before undergoing tumor resection. Of 184 patients, 118 (B) additionally had an interim response assessment 4-6 weeks after the start of chemotherapy. RESULTS: In A, 479 patients (70%) were defined as clinical nonresponders, 207 (30%) as responders. Median survival was 38 months (nonresponders: 27 months, responders: 108 months, log-rank, p < 0.001). Clinical and histopathological response correlated significantly (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, clinical response was an independent prognostic factor (HR for death 1.4, 95% CI 1.0-1.8, p = 0.032). In B, 140 patients (76%) were nonresponders and 44 (24%) responded. Median survival was 33 months, (nonresponders: 27 months, responders: not reached, p = 0.003). Interim clinical response evaluation (118 patients) also had prognostic impact (p = 0.008). Interim, preoperative clinical response and histopathological response correlated strongly (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative clinical response was an independent prognostic factor in center A, while in center B its prognostic value could only be confirmed in univariate analysis. The accordance with histopathological response was good in both centers, and interim clinical response evaluation showed comparable results to preoperative evaluation.

Undervalued criteria in the evaluation of multimodal trials for upper GI cancers.

Global economies and their health systems face a huge challenge from cancer: 1 in 3 women and 1 in 2 men will develop cancer in their lifetime. In the less developed countries, the volume of cancer patients will overwhelm the existing healthcare systems. Even in developed regions, patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer usually present with locally advanced tumors that their prognosis is poor. A detailed knowledge of anatomy, embryology, epidemiology, tumor classifications and tumor growth is key understanding and evaluating the relevant research. We review undervalued criteria necessary to evaluate the response to multimodal therapy for upper GI cancers.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is an independent adverse prognostic factor in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients treated with cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant platin-based therapy is accepted as a standard therapy for advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Patients who respond have a better survival prognosis, but still a significant number of responder patients die from tumor recurrence. Molecular markers for prognosis in neoadjuvantly treated EAC patients have not been identified yet. We investigated the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in prognosis and chemotherapy resistance in these patients. Two EAC patient cohorts, either treated by neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgery (n=86) or by surgical resection (n=46) were analyzed for EGFR protein expression and gene copy number. Data were correlated with clinical and histopathological response, disease-free and overall survival. In case of EGFR overexpression, the prognosis for neoadjuvant chemotherapy responders was poor as in non-responders. Responders had a significantly better disease-free survival than non-responders only if EGFR expression level (p=0.0152) or copy number (p=0.0050) was low. Comparing neoadjuvantly treated patients and primary resection patients, tumors of non-responder patients more frequently exhibited EGFR overexpression, providing evidence that EGFR is a factor for indicating chemotherapy resistance. EGFR overexpression and gene copy number are independent adverse prognostic factors for neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated EAC patients, particularly for responders. Furthermore, EGFR overexpression is involved in resistance to cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Is preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery the appropriate treatment for signet ring cell containing adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction and stomach?

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest primary resection as the preferable approach in patients with signet ring cell gastric cancer (SRC). The aim of our retrospective exploratory study was to evaluate the influence of SRC on prognosis and response in esophagogastric adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 723 locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinomas (cT3/4 N any) documented in a prospective database from two academic centers were classified according to the WHO definition for SRC (more than 50 % SRC) and analyzed for their association with response and prognosis after neoadjuvant treatment. RESULTS: A total of 235 tumors (32.5 %) contained SRC. Median survival of SRC was 26.3 compared with 46.6 months (p < 0.001) for non-SRC. SRC were significantly associated with female gender, gastric localization, advanced ypT and R1/2 categories, and lower risk of surgical complications and anastomotic leakage (each p < 0.001). Clinical (21.1 vs. 33.7 %, p = 0.001) and histopathological response (less than 10 % residual tumor: 16.3 vs. 28.9 %, p < 0.001) were significantly less frequent in SRC. Clinical response (p = 0.003) and complete histopathological response (pCR) (3.4 %) (p = 0.003) were associated with improved prognosis in SRC. Clinical response, surgical complications, ypTN categories, but not SRC were independent prognostic factors in forward Cox regression analysis in R0 resected patients. Risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis was increased (p < 0.001), while local (p = 0.015) and distant metastases (p = 0.02) were less frequent than in non-SRC. CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis of SRC is unfavorable. Although response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is rare in SRC, it is associated with improved outcome. Thus, chemotherapy might not generally be abandoned in SRC. A stratification based on SRC should be included in clinical trials.

Interim endoscopy results during neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer correlate with histopathological response and prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer leads to major histopathological response in less than 30 % of patients. Data on interim endoscopic response assessment do not exist. This exploratory prospective study evaluates early endoscopy after 50 % of the chemotherapy as predictor for later response and prognosis. METHODS: Forty-seven consecutive patients were included (45 resected; 33 R0 resections). All patients received baseline endoscopy and CT scans, after 50 % of their chemotherapy (EGD-1, CT-1) and after completion of chemotherapy (EGD-2, CT-2). Interim endoscopic response (EGD-1) was assessed after having received 50 % (6 weeks) of the planned 12 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Post-chemotherapy response was clinically assessed by a combination of CT scan (CT-2) and endoscopy (EGD-2). Histopathological response was determined by a standardized scoring system (Becker criteria). Endoscopic response was defined as a reduction of >75 % of the tumor mass. RESULTS: Twelve patients were responders at EGD-1 and 13 at EGD-2. Nine patients (19.1 %) were clinical responders and 7 patients (15.6 %) were histopathological responders after chemotherapy. Specificity, accuracy, and negative predictive value of the interim EGD-1 for subsequent histopathological response were 31/38 (82 %), 36/47 (76 %), and 31/33 (93 %); and for recurrence or death, 28/30 (93.3 %), 38/47 (80.9 %), and 28/35 (80.0 %). Response at EGD-1 was significantly associated with histopathological response (p = 0.010), survival (p < 0.001), and recurrence-free survival (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Interim endoscopy after 6 weeks predicts response and prognosis. Therefore, tailoring treatment according to interim endoscopic assessment could be feasible, but the findings of this study should be validated in a larger patient cohort.

Factors predicting prognosis and recurrence in patients with esophago-gastric adenocarcinoma and histopathological response with less than 10 % residual tumor.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant treatment is an accepted standard approach for treating locally advanced esophago-gastric adenocarcinomas. Despite a response of the primary tumor, a significant percentage dies from tumor recurrence. The aim of this retrospective exploratory study from two academic centers was to identify predictors of survival and recurrence in histopathologically responding patients. METHODS: Two hundred thirty one patients with adenocarcinomas (esophagus: n = 185, stomach: n = 46, cT3/4, cN0/+, cM0) treated with preoperative chemotherapy (n = 212) or chemoradiotherapy (n = 19) followed by resection achieved a histopathological response (regression 1a: no residual tumor (n = 58), and regression 1b < 10 % residual tumor (n = 173)). RESULTS: The estimated median overall survival was 92.4 months (5-year survival, 56.6 %) for all patients. For patients with regression 1a, median survival is not reached (5-year survival, 71.6 %) compared to patients with regression 1b with 75.3 months median (5-year survival, 52.2 %) (p = 0.031). Patients with a regression 1a had lymph node metastases in 19.0 versus 33.7 % in regression 1b. The ypT-category (p < 0.001), the M-category (p = 0.005), and the type of treatment (p = 0.04) were found to be independent prognostic factors in R0-resected patients. The recurrence rate was 31.7 % (n = 66) (local, 39.4 %; peritoneal carcinomatosis, 25.7 %; distant metastases, 50 %). Recurrence was predicted by female gender (p = 0.013), ypT-category (p = 0.007), and M-category (p = 0.003) in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Response of the primary tumor does not guarantee recurrence-free long-term survival, but histopathological complete responders have better prognosis compared to partial responders. Established prognostic factors strongly influence the outcome, which could, in the future, be used for stratification of adjuvant treatment approaches. Increasing the rate of histopathological complete responders is a valid endpoint for future clinical trials investigating new drugs.

Prediction of response and prognosis by a score including only pretherapeutic parameters in 410 neoadjuvant treated gastric cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an independent prognostic factor in locally advanced gastric cancer. However, no prospectively tested pretherapeutic parameters predicting response and/or survival in gastric cancer are available in clinical routine. METHODS: We evaluated the prognostic significance of various clinical pathologic parameters in 410 patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy. Clinical and histopathologic response evaluation was performed by using standardized criteria. A prognostic score was created on the basis of the variables identified in the multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Three pretherapeutic parameters were identified as positive predictive factors for response and prognosis: tumor localization in the middle third of the stomach (P=0.001), well-differentiated tumors (P=0.001), and intestinal tumor type according to Laurén classification (P=0.03). A prognostic index was constructed, dividing the patients into three risk groups: low (n=73), intermediate (n=274), and high (n=63). The three groups had significantly different clinical (P=0.007) and histopathologic response rates (P=0.001) and survival times, with a median survival time that was not reached in the low-risk group, 39.2 months in the intermediate-risk group, and 20.5 months in the high-risk group. The corresponding 5-year survival rates were 65.3, 41.2, and 21.2% (P<0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A simple scoring system based on three clinicopathologic parameters accurately predicts response and prognosis in neoadjuvant treated gastric cancer. This system provides additional useful information that could be applied to select gastric cancer patients pretherapeutically for different treatment approaches. Prospective testing of the score in an independent patient cohort is warranted.

Molecular imaging of proliferation and glucose utilization: utility for monitoring response and prognosis after neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic imaging of gastric cancer is limited due to the 30% of primary tumors that are not (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) avid. In contrast, the proliferation marker (18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT) has been shown to visualize also non-FDG-avid gastric tumors. In this study we tested whether FLT-positron emission tomography (PET) can improve the predictive potential of molecular imaging for assessing response to neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer compared with FDG-PET. METHODS: 45 patients with gastric cancer underwent FDG- and FLT-PET before and 2 weeks after initiation of chemotherapy. FDG/FLT-PET findings and Ki67 immunohistochemistry were correlated with clinical and histopathological response and survival. RESULTS: 14 patients had non-FDG-avid tumors, whereas all tumors could be visualized by FLT-PET. No significant association of clinical or histopathological response with any of the analyzed metabolic parameters [initial standardized uptake value (SUV), SUV after 2 weeks, change of SUV for FDG/FLT] was found. Univariate Cox regression analysis for Ki67 and metabolic parameters revealed significant prognostic impact for survival only for FLT SUV(mean) day 14 (p=0.048) and Ki67 (p=0.006). Multivariate Cox regression analysis (including clinical response, Lauren type, ypN category, and FLT SUV(mean) day 14) revealed Lauren type and FLT SUV(mean) day 14 as the only significant prognostic factors (p=0.006, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: FLT uptake 2 weeks after initiation of therapy was shown to be the only imaging parameter with significant prognostic impact. Neither FLT-PET nor FDG-PET were correlated with histopathological or clinical response. However, these data must be interpreted with caution due to the single-center trial study design, relatively short follow-up, poor response rates, and unfavorable prognosis.

Association of the VEGF 936C>T polymorphism with FDG uptake, clinical, histopathological, and metabolic response in patients with adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction.

PURPOSE: The MUNICON trial confirmed prospectively the usefulness of early response evaluation by 2-deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) . Metabolic responders (R) showed initially a higher FDG uptake compared with nonresponders (p = 0.018). An association of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) 936C>T polymorphism and FDG uptake was reported for breast cancer. Therefore, we investigated the VEGF 936C>T polymorphism for an association with response and survival. PROCEDURES: The study was based on 110 patients included in the MUNCON trial (103 male, seven female; 75 AEG I, 35 AEG II, event-free survival (EFS) median 21.1 ± 4.6 months). Response was significantly associated with EFS. The VEGF 936C>T polymorphism was determined by PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. For analysis, the T-variants were combined. RESULTS: One hundred two patients were evaluable. Seventy-two patients showed the CC, 24 the CT, and six the TT genotype. Median EFS was 29.3 months for CC and 11.7 months for CT/TT (p = 0.04). No association of the genotypes (CC or CT/TT) with the SUV or response was found. Multivariate analysis revealed histopathological regression (p = 0.003) and genotype (p = 0.04) as independent prognostic factors. A combination of genotype and PET response (Gen-PET) defines three prognostic groups early in the course of treatment (p = 0.002). Cox regression analysis including clinical and histopathological response and Gen-PET reveals Gen-PET as independent prognostic factor (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The VEGF 936C>T polymorphism is a prognostic factor in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, although it is not associated with FDG uptake and response. The combination of metabolic response and VEGF 936C>T polymorphism defines three different prognostic groups. These findings need to be confirmed prospectively. This study has been registered in the European Clinical Trials Database as trial 2007-003356-11.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for locally advanced cancer of the stomach and cardia: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized trial 40954.

PURPOSE: Patients with locally advanced gastric cancer benefit from combined pre- and postoperative chemotherapy, although fewer than 50% could receive postoperative chemotherapy. We examined the value of purely preoperative chemotherapy in a phase III trial with strict preoperative staging and surgical resection guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction (AEG II and III) were randomly assigned to preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery or to surgery alone. To detect with 80% power an improvement in median survival from 17 months with surgery alone to 24 months with neoadjuvant, 282 events were required. RESULTS: This trial was stopped for poor accrual after 144 patients were randomly assigned (72:72); 52.8% patients had tumors located in the proximal third of the stomach, including AEG type II and III. The International Union Against Cancer R0 resection rate was 81.9% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as compared with 66.7% with surgery alone (P = .036). The surgery-only group had more lymph node metastases than the neoadjuvant group (76.5% v 61.4%; P = .018). Postoperative complications were more frequent in the neoadjuvant arm (27.1% v 16.2%; P = .09). After a median follow-up of 4.4 years and 67 deaths, a survival benefit could not be shown (hazard ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.35; P = .466). CONCLUSION: This trial showed a significantly increased R0 resection rate but failed to demonstrate a survival benefit. Possible explanations are low statistical power, a high rate of proximal gastric cancer including AEG and/or a better outcome than expected after radical surgery alone due to the high quality of surgery with resections of regional lymph nodes outside the perigastic area (celiac trunc, hepatic ligament, lymph node at a. lienalis; D2).

Prognostic significance of free peritoneal tumor cells in the peritoneal cavity before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric carcinoma undergoing potentially curative resection.

BACKGROUND: Free peritoneal tumor cells (FPTCs) are an independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing curative resection for gastric carcinoma. Whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can eliminate FPTCs in the peritoneal lavage remains unclear. The aim of the study was to determine the effect of NAC on FPTCs. METHODS: From 1994 to 2000, data from a total of 61 patients with resectable gastric cancer were analyzed. Peritoneal cytology was performed before NAC at laparoscopy and at tumor resection. A minimum of 6 weeks of NAC, consisting of cisplatin, folinic acid, and fluorouracil, was administered. FPTCs were detected immunohistochemically with Ber-EP4 antibody. RESULTS: No FPTCs could be detected in 42 patients (69%), compared to 19 (31%) with FPTCs before NAC. During chemotherapy, 10 (24%) of 42 patients developed FPTCs, and 7 (37%) of 19 patients reverted from positive to negative. Patients who became FPTC negative (n = 7) showed an improved median survival (36.1 months) and a longer 2-year survival (71.4%) compared to FPTC-positive patients before and after NAC (n = 12), with a median survival of 9.2 months and a 2-year survival rate of 25%. In contrast, patients who reverted from FPTC negative to positive during NAC (n = 10) had a median survival of 18.5 months and a 2-year survival of only 20%. Multivariate analysis identified ypN category and FPTC change as independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: NAC for patients with positive cytology could lead to FPTC negativity in a subset of patients and improve their prognosis. However, NAC might be a risky strategy for almost one-quarter of patients whose disease develops positive cytology.

Differential expression of the chemokines GRO-2, GRO-3, and interleukin-8 in colon cancer and their impact on metastatic disease and survival.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Chemotactic cytokines play a role in angiogenesis and attraction of immune cells. However, their contribution to tumor formation remains incompletely understood. In a previous transcriptome study, we identified a family of structurally related chemokines of the CXC-family to be specifically up-regulated in colorectal cancer. The aim of the present study was to investigate the regulation of their expression in colon cancer cells and to test the hypothesis that altered CXC-chemokine expression is related to critical clinical parameters, such as survival or metastasis formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Expression levels of interleukin-8 (CXCL-8) and growth-related oncogenes 2 and 3 (GRO-2/CXCL-2 and GRO-3/CXCL-3) were quantified using qRT-PCR in 97 patients with completely resected colon carcinoma and correlated with clinical parameters. Moreover, 16 samples of normal mucosa, nine samples of benign adenoma, and 11 samples of liver metastasis were analyzed. Next, the regulation of chemokine expression in response to various stimuli was tested in colon cancer cell lines (HT29, HCT116, CaCO2). RESULTS: Expression of GRO-2, GRO-3, and IL-8 was significantly increased in colon cancer as compared to normal colon tissue. Expression of GRO-2 and GRO-3 was already enhanced in premalignant adenomas, and GRO-3 was significantly down-regulated in liver metastasis as compared to the primary tumor. Importantly, expression of GRO-3 was significantly higher in patients with local versus systemic disease. Moreover, IL-8 expression was significantly associated to overall post-operative survival. Finally, all chemokines were strongly induced by IL-1alpha in the colon cancer cell lines tested, indicating a potential link to inflammatory processes. CONCLUSION: In accordance with earlier findings, we report here a significantly increased expression of GRO-2, GRO-3, and IL-8 in colon carcinoma as compared to normal tissue. Furthermore, GRO-3 was related to metastasis formation, and IL-8 was associated with survival, suggesting a potential predictive power of these markers.

Immunohistochemical detection of receptor tyrosine kinases c-kit, EGF-R, and PDGF-R in colorectal adenocarcinomas.

PURPOSE: The selective inhibition of tyrosine kinases is a promising strategy in the treatment of several human malignancies. This study aimed to clarify expression patterns of therapeutically addressable receptor tyrosine kinases in colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, we used tissue arrays to analyze 263 specimen of colorectal carcinoma for the expression of the tyrosine kinases c-kit (CD117), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R), and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGF-R). Staining patterns were then correlated with tumor stage and survival. RESULTS: Five tumors (1.9%) showed a strong expression of c-kit (CD117), while in 40 samples (15.2%), a weak/intermediate expression was observed. Positive staining did not correlate with histopathological parameters although a trend toward a better survival of c-kit-positive patients was observed. No positivity for PDGF-R was observed in 263 samples of colorectal carcinomas. Positive EGF-R expression was identified in 39 cases (15.2%), whereas 218 samples (84.8%) stained negative. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that expression of the tyrosine kinases c-kit and PDGF-R are rare in colorectal carcinomas and do not correlate with tumor stage.

Prognostic significance of histopathological tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinomas.

We evaluated histomorphological findings in 92 surgical resection specimens of locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinomas after neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was determined using a system encompassing three tumor regression grades based on the estimation of the percentage of residual tumor tissue of the primary tumor site in relation to the macroscopically identifiable previous tumor bed. The significance of this system was validated by correlation of the tumor regression grades with the corresponding clinicopathological characteristics and patient survival. Seven patients (7%) had complete tumor regression (grade tumor regression grade 1), 48 patients (52%) had subtotal or partial tumor regression (tumor regression grade 2: 1-50% residual tumor), and 37 patients (40%) had minimal or no regression (tumor regression grade 3: >50% residual tumor). Tumor regression was significantly associated with posttreatment complete tumor resection status (UICC R0 status; P=0.016), tumor category (UICC pT category; P<0.001), and with the absence of either lymph node metastases (P=0.001) or lymphatic invasion (P<0.001). Survival analysis showed a significant prognostic relevance of the applied regression system in univariate (P<0.001) and multivariate analyses as a single independent factor (P=0.024). We conclude that the effect of preoperative chemotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinomas can be assessed by the determination of histological tumor regression, providing highly valuable prognostic information, which may even exceed the prognostic impact of the current TNM classification of these tumors. Therefore, we strongly recommend the implementation of a standardized tumor regression grading system in pathological reports of esophageal adenocarcinomas treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Long-term outcome of endoscopic therapy in patients with bile duct injury after cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Bile duct lesions, including leaks and strictures, are immanent complications of open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopic procedures have gained increasing potential as the treatment of choice in the management of postoperative bile duct injuries. METHODS: Between January 1996 and December 2006, 44 patients with biliary leakages and 12 patients with biliary strictures after cholecystectomy were identified by analyzing the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography database, clinical records, and cholangiograms. The long-term follow up of endoscopic treatment in biliary lesions after cholecystectomy was evaluated by this retrospective study. RESULTS: In 34 of 35 patients (97%) with peripheral bile duct leakages, endoscopic therapy was successful. Transpapillary endoprothesis and/or nasobiliary drainage were removed after 31 (5-399) days. After stent removal, the median follow-up period was 81 (11-137) months. In patients with central bile duct leakages, the success rate after median 90 (4-145) days of endoscopic therapy was 66.7% (6/9 patients). The median follow up after stent removal in six successfully treated patients was 70 (48-92) months. Eleven of 12 patients (91.6%) with bile duct strictures had successfully completed stent therapy. The follow-up period of this patient group was 99 (53-140) months. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic treatment of bile duct lesions after cholecystectomy is effective, particularly in patients with peripheral bile duct leakages and bile duct strictures. Therefore, it should be the first-line therapy used in these patients. Although endoscopic management is less successful in patients with central bile duct leakages, an attempt is warranted.

Reduced lymph node yield in rectal carcinoma specimen after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy has no prognostic relevance.

BACKGROUND: In colorectal surgery UICC/AJCC criteria require a yield of 12 or more locoregional lymph nodes for adequate staging. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for rectal carcinoma reduces the number of lymph nodes in the resection specimen; the prognostic impact of this reduced lymph node yield has not been determined. METHODS: One hundred two patients with uT3 rectal carcinoma who were receiving neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy were compared with 114 patients with uT3 rectal carcinoma who were receiving primary surgery followed by adjuvant radiochemotherapy. Total lymph node yield and number of tumor-positive lymph nodes were determined and correlated with survival. RESULTS: After neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy both total lymph node yield (12.9 vs. 21.4, p < 0.0001) and number of tumor-positive lymph nodes (1.0 vs. 2.3, p = 0.014) were significantly lower than after primary surgery plus adjuvant radiochemotherapy. Reduced total lymph node yield in neoadjuvantly treated patients had no prognostic impact, with overall survival of patients with 12 or more lymph nodes the same as that of patients with less than 12 lymph nodes. Overall survival of neoadjuvantly treated patients was significantly influenced by the number of tumor-positive lymph nodes with 5-year-survival rates of 88, 63, and 39% for 0, 1-3, and more than 3 positive lymph nodes (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The UICC/AJCC criterion of a total lymph node yield of 12 or more should be revised for rectal carcinoma patients.

The predictive value of metabolic response to preoperative radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer measured by PET/CT.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the value of positron emission tomography using fluorodeoxyglucose and computer tomography scan (FDG-PET/CT) for prediction of histopathological response of preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCTX) in patients with rectal carcinoma. METHODS: Thirty patients with uT3 rectal carcinoma were examined by FDG-PET/CT at baseline, 14 days after initiation, and after completion of preoperative RCTX. The FDG decreases seen with PET scanning from baseline to day 14 (early metabolic response) and after completion of therapy (late metabolic response) were compared with histopathological tumor response. One patient denied surgery after RCTX. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) reduction of tumor FDG uptake in histopathologically responding compared to non-responding tumors was -44.3% (+/-20.1%) versus -29.6% (+/-13.1%) (p = 0.085) at day 14 and -66.0% (+/-20.3%) versus -48.3% (+/-23.4%) (p = 0.040) after completion of RCTX. Best differentiation of histopathological tumor response was achieved by a cut-off value of 35% reduction of initial FDG uptake at day 14 and 57.5% after completion of therapy. Applying the cut-off values as a criterion for metabolic response, histopathological response was predicted with a sensitivity of 74% (14/19) at day 14 and 79% (15/19) after completion of therapy. The positive predictive value for early metabolic response was 82% (14/17) and for late metabolic response was 83% (15/18). Histopathological evidence of accumulated peritumoral inflammation cells was associated with a minor FDG decrease in five histopathologically responding patients, and influenced the results with negative predictive values of 58% (7/12) and 64% (7/11) at the early and late time points, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic response to a preoperative RCTX using FDG-PET/CT in rectal cancer patients can be correlated with histopathological response, but FDG uptake of peritumoral inflammation cells limited the results and led to false negative results.

Procalcitonin ratio indicates successful surgical treatment of abdominal sepsis.

BACKGROUND: On-demand relaparotomy has been associated with a slightly decreased mortality compared to planned relaparotomy in the surgical treatment of secondary peritonitis. On-demand relaparotomy must be performed without delay to detect progressing sepsis early, before the onset of multiorgan failure. The aim of the study was to evaluate procalcitonin (PCT) as a parameter for early detection of progressing sepsis after operative treatment of the infective source. METHODS: In 104 consecutive patients with secondary peritonitis, PCT serum levels were monitored on postoperative days 1 and 2 after initial operative elimination of the septic focus. The PCT ratio between postoperative days 1 and 2 was calculated and correlated to the success of the initial intervention. The latter was considered inadequate if relaparotomies were necessary to eliminate the intraabdominal infection. RESULTS: Using classification and regression tree analysis, a cutoff could be calculated at 1.03 for the PCT ratio of postoperative day 1 to day 2. Lesser values indicated unsuccessful elimination of the septic source, whereas values above 1.03 represented successful operative treatment of the septic focus. Unsuccessful treatment of the septic process could be detected with a specificity of 63% and a sensitivity of 95%. CONCLUSION: The PCT ratio appears to be a valuable aid in deciding if further relaparotomies are necessary after initial operative treatment of an intraabdominal septic focus.

Prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer is associated with lymph node ratio: a single-center analysis of 3,026 patients over a 25-year time period.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the prognostic impact of lymph node ratio (relation of tumor-infiltrated to resected lymph nodes) in comparison to the pN category and other prognostic factors in patients with colorectal cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although the high prognostic impact of lymph node metastases and the total number of lymph nodes to be resected are well established, studies still report large differences in lymph node numbers. The lymph node ratios relevant for prognosis are not clearly defined and not routinely reported. METHODS: We analyzed the clinical and histopathological data of 3026 patients with colorectal cancer at a single surgical center over a 25-year time period (1982-2006). RESULTS: One thousand seven hundred sixty-three colon and 1263 rectal carcinomas were documented. The rate of curative resection was 77.4% and the median number of resected lymph nodes was 16. The optimal cut-off values for prognostic differentiation of LNRs were statistically calculated as 0.17, 0.41, and 0.69. The 5-year overall survival of patients without lymph node metastases was 87%. Patients with lymph node metastases had 5-year overall survival rates of 60.6%, 34.4%, 17.6%, and 5.3% with increasing LNRs (P < 0.001). Multivariate survival analysis identified both the LNR and the pN category, the number of resected lymph nodes, the patient's age, the tumor location (colon vs. rectum), the pT category, the pM status, the R status, the tumor grade, and the year of operation as independent prognostic factors. The LNR had better prognostic value than the pN category (P < 0.05). The analysis of the subgroup of patients separated into colon and rectal cancer patients confirmed the identified LNRs as independent prognostic factors (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The defined cut-off values of LNRs were strong independent prognostic factors for colorectal cancer patients and should be calculated for risk group stratification.

Paclitaxel in the neoadjuvant treatment for adeno carcinoma of the distal esophagus (AEG I). A comparison of two phase II trials with long-term follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: We report a comparative analysis of 2 sequential, prospective phase II trials on the efficacy of platinum/leucovorin/5-fluorouracil (PLF) +/- paclitaxel (T-PLF) in the neoadjuvant treatment of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (AEG I). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria were histologically proven, locally advanced AEG I stage uT3/4 anyN cM0/M1a. 67 patients were treated with either PLF (n = 32) or T-PLF (n = 35). Paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) was added to PLF on days 1, 15, and 29. Primary endpoint was the response. Additionally, 5-year survival was analyzed. RESULTS: The study population was well balanced, apart from an imbalance in clinical cM1a (33.3% PLF vs. 8.6% T-PLF; p = 0.01). Histopathological response rates (23.3% PLF vs. 25.0% T-PLF) showed no significant difference. Clinical response rates were improved for T-PLF (21.9 vs. 45.7%; p = 0.04). Median overall survival for clinical and histopathological responders was significantly improved for T-PLF (p = 0.005, p = 0.01), but not for PLF (p = 0.08, p = 0.25). Median overall survival was better with T-PLF without reaching statistical significance (18.9 months PLF vs. 43.1 months T-PLF; p = 0.27). Toxicity was slightly increased by paclitaxel. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Our data failed to demonstrate statistically significant superiority of the T-PLF regimen except for clinical response. However, there was a trend towards improved survival.