Pituitary surgery in elderly patients: a safe and effective procedure.

PURPOSE: The incidence of pituitary adenoma (PA) increases with age. Transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) in elderly patients is often considered to have greater risk compared to the younger population. The aim of this study is to compare surgical results, evolution and postoperative complications between elderly and young patients undergoing TSS. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients undergoing TSS between 2011 and 2018 in our institution. Patients were divided into two cohorts: elderly (≥65 years) and non-elderly (<65 years). Characteristics and outcomes of both groups were compared at diagnosis, before surgery and for an average of 5.9 years of postoperative follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-five patients were included, 53 patients were ≥65 years (42%). The elderly patients were more likely to have non-functioning PA (NFPA) (90.5% vs. 45.8%, p: <0.01), a higher proportion of macroadenomas (92.4% vs. 77.8%, p = 0.029) and greater extrasellar extension (88.7% vs. 68.1%, p = 0.007). The elderly group also had more compressive symptoms (54.7% vs. 34.7%, p = 0.035) and hypopituitarism (66% vs. 47.2%, p = 0.029). Overall, surgical and endocrinological outcomes between the two groups were similar. Inpatient mortality in the elderly group was 1.8%. Regarding long-term outcomes, elderly patients had more postoperative hypopituitarism (67.9% vs. 45.8%, p = 0.03) with no differences in permanent diabetes insipidus, less residual tumours (24.5% vs. 40.3%, p = 0.019) and a higher rate of remission after surgery (71.7% vs. 52.8%, p = 0.034). When only NFPA cases were compared, the only significant difference was a higher frequency of macroadenomas in the elderly group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the safety and efficacy of TSS in elderly patients with PA. Age should not be considered an exclusion criterion for TSS given that successful results can be achieved if an experienced pituitary team is available.

Early versus conventional nutritional intervention in head and neck cancer patients before radiotherapy: benefits of a fast-track circuit.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Radiotherapy (RT) is a component of therapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) with a negative nutritional impact. Our aim was to compare an early versus a conventional nutritional intervention. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of HNC patients undergoing RT. Evolution before and after the establishment of a fast-track circuit was evaluated. A conventional group (CG) made up of patients submitted to the nutrition unit during RT after nutritional deterioration, was compared to an early group (EG) represented by patients included in a fast-track circuit, starting nutritional follow-up before the beginning of RT. Only patients with preserved oral intake were involved. Demographic, nutritional and clinical variables were analyzed. Data of hospitalizations and deaths were collected up to three months after RT. RESULTS: 135 subjects constituted the EG and 39 the CG. At baseline, the prevalence of malnutrition was lower in the EG (31.9% vs 69.5%, p = 0.0001), as was the need for nutritional supplements (40% vs 79.5%, p = 0.0001) or nasogastric tube (0% vs 12.8%, p = 0.0001) in comparison to the CG. Three months after RT, there were less patients with oral nutritional support in the EG (79.1% vs 96.9%, p = 0.018), and the number of emergency visits (0.75 vs 1.1 episodes per patient, p = 0.021) and hospitalizations was also lower in this group (29% vs 59%, p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: The fast-track approach made early intervention possible. Therefore, patients maintained a better nutritional status, needed less nutritional support and their evolution improved, with a significant decrease in hospitalizations.