Lessons Learned: Transfer of the High-Definition Circulating Tumor Cell Assay Platform to Development as a Commercialized Clinical Assay Platform.

Planning and transfer of a new technology platform developed in an academic setting to a start-up company for medical diagnostic product development may appear daunting and costly in terms of complexity, time, and resources. In this review we outline the key steps taken and lessons learned when a technology platform developed in an academic setting was transferred to a start-up company for medical diagnostic product development in the interest of elucidating development toolkits for academic groups and small start-up companies starting on the path to commercialization and regulatory approval.

I-SPY 2: an adaptive breast cancer trial design in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

I-SPY 2 (investigation of serial studies to predict your therapeutic response with imaging and molecular analysis 2) is a process targeting the rapid, focused clinical development of paired oncologic therapies and biomarkers. The framework is an adaptive phase II clinical trial design in the neoadjuvant setting for women with locally advanced breast cancer. I-SPY 2 is a collaborative effort among academic investigators, the National Cancer Institute, the US Food and Drug Administration, and the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries under the auspices of the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Biomarkers Consortium.

Agents, biomarkers, and cohorts for chemopreventive agent development in prostate cancer.

Chemoprevention is the use of agents to slow progression of, reverse, or inhibit carcinogenesis thereby lowering the risk of developing invasive or clinically significant disease. With its long latency, high incidence and significant morbidity and mortality, prostate cancer is a relevant target for chemoprevention. Developing rational chemopreventive strategies for prostate cancer requires well-characterized agents, suitable cohorts, and reliable intermediate biomarkers of cancer. Chemopreventive agent requirements are experimental or epidemiologic data showing efficacy, safety on chronic administration, and a mechanistic rationale for activity. Current promising agents include antiandrogens and antiestrogens; steroid aromatase inhibitors; retinoids and their modulators; 5alpha-reductase inhibitors; vitamins D, E, and analogs; selenium compounds; carotenoids; soy isoflavones; dehydroepiandrostenedione and analogs; 2-difluoromethylornithine; lipoxygenase inhibitors; apoptosis inducers; and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Identifying biomarkers and validating them as surrogate endpoints for cancer incidence are critical for prostate chemoprevention trials. Potentially useful biomarkers for prostate chemoprevention are associated with histologic, proliferative, differentiation-related, biochemical, and genetic/regulatory features of prostatic disease. In that the prostate is not easily visualized, critical issues also include adequacy and consistency of tissue sampling. Various drugs for the chemoprevention of prostate cancer are now under evaluation in phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials. Cohort selection should be based on various patient characteristics (stage of the disease, previous cancers or premalignant lesions, or high risk factors) and should be conducted within the context of standard treatment.

Surrogate end-point biomarkers in chemopreventive drug development.

Relevant and feasible surrogate end-points are needed for the evaluation of intervention strategies against cancer and other chronic, life-threatening diseases. Carcinogenesis can be viewed as a process of progressive disorganization. This process is characterized by the accumulation of genotypic lesions and corresponding tissue and cellular abnormalities, including loss of proliferation and apoptosis controls. Potential surrogate end-points for cancer incidence include both phenotypic and genotypic biomarkers of this progression. In the US National Cancer Institute chemoprevention programme, histological modulation of a precancer (intraepithelial neoplasia) has so far been the primary phenotypic surrogate end-point in chemoprevention trials. Additionally, high priority has been given to biomarkers measuring specific and general genotypic changes correlated with the carcinogenesis progression model for the targeted cancer (e.g., progressive genomic instability as measured by loss of heterozygosity or amplification at specific microsatellite loci). Other potential surrogate end-points include proliferation and differentiation indices, specific gene and general chromosome damage, cell growth regulatory molecules, and biochemical activities (e.g., enzyme inhibition). Serum biomarkers thought to be associated with cancer progression (e.g., prostate-specific antigen) are particularly appealing surrogate end-points because of accessibility. Potentially chemopreventive effects of the test agent may also be measured (e.g., tissue and serum estrogen levels in studies of steroid aromatase inhibitors). To establish chemopreventive efficacy, prevention of virtually all biomarker lesions, or of those lesions with particular propensity for progression, may be required. Ideally, the phenotype and genotype of any new or remaining precancers in the target tissue of chemopreventive agent-treated subjects would show less, and certainly no greater, potential for progression than those of placebo-treated subjects.

Potential use of lipoxygenase inhibitors for cancer chemoprevention.

Increasing evidence suggests that lipoxygenase (LO)-catalysed metabolites have a profound influence on the development and progression of human cancers. Compared with normal tissues, significantly elevated levels of LO products have been found in breast tumours, colon cancers, lung, skin and prostate cancers, as well as in cells from patients with both acute and chronic leukaemias. LO-mediated products elicit diverse biological activities needed for neoplastic cell growth, influencing growth factor and transcription factor activation, oncogene induction, stimulation of tumour cell adhesion and regulation of apoptotic cell death. Agents that block LO catalytic activity may be effective in preventing cancer by interfering with signalling events needed for tumour growth. In the past ten years, pharmaceuticals agents that specifically inhibit the 5-LO metabolic pathway have been developed to treat inflammatory diseases such as asthma, arthritis and psoriasis. Some of these compounds possess anti-oxidant properties and may be effective in preventing cancer by blocking free radical-induced genetic damage or by preventing the metabolic activation of carcinogens. Other compounds may work by negatively modulating DNA synthesis. Pharmacological profiles of potential chemopreventive agents are compiled from enzyme assays, in vitro testing (e.g., cell proliferation inhibition in human cancer cells) and in vivo animal carcinogenesis models (e.g., N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced rat mammary cancer, benzo(a)pyrene-induced lung tumours in strain A/J mice and hormone-induced prostate tumours in rats). In this way, compounds are identified for chemoprevention trials in human subjects. Based on currently available data, it is expected that the prevention of lung and prostate cancer will be initially studied in human trials of LO inhibitors.

Retinoids in chemoprevention and differentiation therapy.

Retinoids are essential for the maintenance of epithelial differentiation. As such, they play a fundamental role in chemoprevention of epithelial carcinogenesis and in differentiation therapy. Physiological retinoic acid is obtained through two oxidation steps from dietary retinol, i.e. retinol-->retinal-->retinoic acid. The latter retinal-->retinoic acid step is irreversible and eventually marks disposal of this essential nutrient, through cytochrome P450-dependent oxidative steps. Mutant mice deficient in aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) accumulate retinyl palmitate, retinol and retinoic acid. This suggests a direct connection between the AHR and retinoid homeostasis. Retinoids control gene expression through the nuclear retinoic acid receptors (RARs) alpha, beta and gamma and 9-cis-retinoic acid receptors alpha, beta and gamma, which bind with high affinity the natural ligands all-trans-retinoic acid and 9-cis-retinoic acid, respectively. Retinoids are effective chemopreventive agents against skin, head and neck, breast, liver and other forms of cancer. Differentiation therapy of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is based on the ability of retinoic acid to induce differentiation of leukemic promyelocytes. Patients with relapsed, retinoid-resistant APL are now being treated with arsenic oxide, which results in apoptosis of the leukemic cells. Interestingly, induction of differentiation in promyelocytes and consequent remission of APL following retinoid therapy depends on expression of a chimeric PML-RAR alpha fusion protein resulting from a t(15;17) chromosomal translocation. This protein functions as a dominant negative against the function of both PML and RARs and its overexpression is able to recreate the phenotypes of the disease in transgenic mice. The development of new, more effective and less toxic retinoids, alone or in combination with other drugs, may provide additional avenues for cancer chemoprevention and differentiation therapy.

Clinical development of estrogen modulators for breast cancer chemoprevention in premenopausal vs. postmenopausal women.

Tamoxifen has proven to be beneficial in the chemoprevention of breast cancer in women at increased risk for the disease. Other compounds that mediate the estrogen pathway remain to be tested for clinical efficacy. The mechanism of action, efficacy, and dose response of the estrogen modulators is determined by the hormonal milieu of the host which should be considered in the early clinical trials for dose range finding studies and surrogate endpoint biomarker (SEB) evaluation. This review presents the hormonal effects to consider in the clinical testing of an agent in premenopausal vs. postmenopausal cohorts. Recommended SEBs that may be evaluated in Phase I/II clinical trials of estrogen modulators for breast cancer chemoprevention are presented.

Progress in cancer chemoprevention: development of diet-derived chemopreventive agents.

Because of their safety and the fact that they are not perceived as "medicine," food-derived products are highly interesting for development as chemopreventive agents that may find widespread, long-term use in populations at normal risk. Numerous diet-derived agents are included among the >40 promising agents and agent combinations that are being evaluated clinically as chemopreventive agents for major cancer targets including breast, prostate, colon and lung. Examples include green and black tea polyphenols, soy isoflavones, Bowman-Birk soy protease inhibitor, curcumin, phenethyl isothiocyanate, sulforaphane, lycopene, indole-3-carbinol, perillyl alcohol, vitamin D, vitamin E, selenium and calcium. Many food-derived agents are extracts, containing multiple compounds or classes of compounds. For developing such agents, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has advocated codevelopment of a single or a few putative active compounds that are contained in the food-derived agent. The active compounds provide mechanistic and pharmacologic data that may be used to characterize the chemopreventive potential of the extract, and these compounds may find use as chemopreventives in higher risk subjects (patients with precancers or previous cancers). Other critical aspects to developing the food-derived products are careful analysis and definition of the extract to ensure reproducibility (e.g., growth conditions, chromatographic characteristics or composition), and basic science studies to confirm epidemiologic findings associating the food product with cancer prevention.

Perspectives on surrogate end points in the development of drugs that reduce the risk of cancer.

This paper proposes a scientific basis and possible strategy for applying surrogate end points in chemopreventive drug development. The potential surrogate end points for cancer incidence described are both phenotypic (at the tissue, cellular, and molecular levels) and genotypic biomarkers. To establish chemopreventive efficacy in randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials, it is expected that in most cases it will be critical to ensure that virtually all of the biomarker lesions are prevented or that the lesions prevented are those with the potential to progress. This would require that both the phenotype and genotype of the target tissue in agent-treated subjects, especially in any new or remaining precancers, are equivalent to or show less progression than those of placebo-treated subjects. In the National Cancer Institute chemoprevention program, histological modulation of a precancer (intraepithelial neoplasia) has thus far been the primary phenotypic surrogate end point in chemoprevention trials. Additionally, we give high priority to biomarkers measuring specific and general genotypic changes correlating to the carcinogenesis progression model for the targeted cancer (e.g., progressive genomic instability as measured by loss of heterozygosity or amplification at a specific microsatellite loci). Other potential surrogate end points that may occur earlier in carcinogenesis are being analyzed in these precancers and in nearby normal appearing tissues. These biomarkers include proliferation and differentiation indices, specific gene and general chromosome damage, cell growth regulatory molecules, and biochemical activities (e.g., enzyme inhibition). Serum biomarkers also may be monitored (e.g., prostate-specific antigen) because of their accessibility. Potentially chemopreventive drug effects of the test agent also may be measured (e.g., tissue and serum estrogen levels in studies of steroid aromatase inhibitors). These initial studies are expected to expand the list of validated surrogate end points for future use. Continued discussion and research among the National Cancer Institute, the Food and Drug Administration, industry, and academia are needed to ensure that surrogate end point-based chemoprevention indications are feasible.

Comparative chemopreventive mechanisms of green tea, black tea and selected polyphenol extracts measured by in vitro bioassays.

Black tea extracts (hot aqueous, polyphenols and theaflavins) and green tea extracts (hot aqueous, polyphenols, epicatechin, epicatechin gallate, epigallocatechin and epigallocatechin gallate) were tested in nine standardized cell culture assays for comparative cancer chemopreventive properties. Most black and green tea extracts strongly inhibited neoplastic transformation in mouse mammary organ cultures, rat tracheal epithelial cells and human lung tumor epithelial cells. Nearly all tea fractions strongly inhibited benzo[a]pyrene adduct formation with human DNA. Induction of phase II enzymes, glutathione-S-transferase and quinone reductase, were enhanced by nearly all tea fractions, while glutathione was induced by only a few fractions. Ornithine decarboxylase activity was inhibited by nearly all the green tea fractions, but none of the black tea fractions. 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced free radicals were inhibited by most tea fractions. These results provide strong evidence of both anti-mutagenic, anti-proliferative and anti-neoplastic activities for both black and green tea extracts. Such anticancer mechanisms may well be responsible for the cancer preventive efficacies seen in both experimental and human studies.

Lipoxygenase inhibitors as potential cancer chemopreventives.

Mounting evidence suggests that lipoxygenase (LO)-catalyzed products have a profound influence on the development and progression of human cancers. Compared with normal tissues, significantly elevated levels of LO metabolites have been found in lung, prostate, breast, colon, and skin cancer cells, as well as in cells from patients with both acute and chronic leukemias. LO-mediated products elicit diverse biological activities needed for neoplastic cell growth, influencing growth factor and transcription factor activation, oncogene induction, stimulation of tumor cell adhesion, and regulation of apoptotic cell death. Agents that block LO-catalyzed activity may be effective in preventing cancer by interfering with signaling events needed for tumor growth. In fact, in a few studies, LO inhibitors have prevented carcinogen-induced lung adenomas and rat mammary gland cancers. During the past 10 years, pharmacological agents that specifically inhibit the LO-mediated signaling pathways are now commercially available to treat inflammatory diseases such as asthma, arthritis, and psoriasis. These well-characterized agents, representing two general drug effect mechanisms, are considered good candidates for clinical chemoprevention studies. One mechanism is inhibition of LO activity (5-LO and associated enzymes, or 12-LO); the second is leukotriene receptor antagonism. Although the receptor antagonists have high potential in treating asthma and other diseases where drug effects are clearly mediated by the leukotriene receptors, enzyme activity inhibitors may be better candidates for chemopreventive intervention, because inhibition of these enzymes directly reduces fatty acid metabolite production, with concomitant damping of the associated inflammatory, proliferative, and metastatic activities that contribute to carcinogenesis. However, because receptor antagonists have aerosol formulations and possible antiproliferative activity, they may also have potential, particularly in the lung, where topical application of such formulations is feasible.

Chemoprevention of prostate cancer: concepts and strategies.

Chemoprevention is the administration of agents to prevent induction and inhibit or delay progression of cancers. For prostate, as for other cancer targets, successful chemopreventive strategies require well-characterized agents, suitable cohorts, and reliable intermediate biomarkers of cancer for evaluating chemopreventive efficacy. Agent requirements are experimental or epidemiological data showing chemopreventive efficacy, safety on chronic administration, and a mechanistic rationale for the observed chemopreventive activity. On this basis, promising chemopreventive drugs in prostate include retinoids, antiandrogens, antiestrogens, steroid aromatase inhibitors, 5alpha-reductase inhibitors, vitamins D and E, selenium, lycopene, and 2-difluoromethylornithine. Phase II trials are critical for evaluating chemopreventive efficacy. Cohorts in these trials should be suitable for measuring the chemopreventive activity of the agent and the intermediate biomarkers chosen as endpoints. Many cohorts proposed for phase II trials are patients with previous cancers or premalignant lesions. For such patients, trials should be conducted within the context of standard treatment. Two cohorts currently used in phase II prostate cancer chemoprevention trials are patients with PIN and patients scheduled for prostate cancer surgery. Biomarkers should fit expected biological mechanisms, be assayed reliably and quantitatively, measured easily, and correlate to decreased cancer incidence. Protocols for adequately sampling tissue are essential. Changes in PIN provide prostate biomarkers with the ability to be quantified and a high correlation to cancer. PIN measurements include nuclear polymorphism, nucleolar size and number of nucleoli/nuclei, and DNA ploidy. Other potentially useful biomarkers are associated with cellular proliferation kinetics (e.g. PCNA and apoptosis), differentiation (e.g. blood group antigens, vimentin), genetic damage (e.g. LOH on chromosome 8), signal transduction (e.g. TGFalpha, TGFbeta, IGF-I, c-erbB-2 expression), angiogenesis, and biochemical changes (e.g. PSA levels).

Cancer chemoprevention: progress and promise.

Cancer chemoprevention is the use of agents to inhibit, delay or reverse carcinogenesis. The focus of chemoprevention research in the next millennium will include defining the genotypic and phenotypic (functional and histological) changes during carcinogenesis, the cancer risk conferred by these changes, their modulation in preclinical experimentation and randomised clinical trials by chemopreventive drugs, dietary agents and regimens and treatments resulting from early detection. The key elements of this research effort will be basic and translational risk evaluation programmes; chemopreventive and dietary agent drug discovery and development; development of transgenic animal models; required safety and pharmacology studies; well-designed phase I, II and III chemoprevention studies; and much expanded early detection programmes. The large number of chemoprevention research programmes now ongoing ensures that the promise of chemoprevention will continue to be realised in the next decade.

Cancer chemoprevention: progress and promise.

Cancer chemoprevention is the use of agents to inhibit, delay or reverse carcinogenesis. The focus of chemoprevention research in the next millennium will include defining the genotypic and phenotypic (functional and histological) changes during carcinogenesis, the cancer risk conferred by these changes, their modulation in preclinical experimentation and randomised clinical trials by chemopreventive drugs, dietary agents and regimens and treatments resulting from early detection. The key elements of this research effort will be basic and translational risk evaluation programmes; chemopreventive and dietary agent drug discovery and development; development of transgenic animal models; required safety and pharmacology studies; well-designed phase I, II and III chemoprevention studies; and much expanded early detection programmes. The large number of chemoprevention research programmes now ongoing ensures that the promise of chemoprevention will continue to be realised in the next decade.

Progress in cancer chemoprevention.

More than 40 promising agents and agent combinations are being evaluated clinically as chemopreventive drugs for major cancer targets. A few have been in vanguard, large-scale intervention trials--for example, the studies of tamoxifen and fenretinide in breast, 13-cis-retinoic acid in head and neck, vitamin E and selenium in prostate, and calcium in colon. These and other agents are currently in phase II chemoprevention trials to establish the scope of their chemopreventive efficacy and to develop intermediate biomarkers as surrogate end points for cancer incidence in future studies. In this group are fenretinide, 2-difluoromethylornithine, and oltipraz. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAID) are also in this group because of their colon cancer chemopreventive effects in clinical intervention, epidemiological, and animal studies. New agents are continually considered for development as chemopreventive drugs. Preventive strategies with antiandrogens are evolving for prostate cancer. Anti-inflammatories that selectively inhibit inducible cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 are being investigated in colon as alternatives to the NSAID, which inhibit both COX-1 and COX-2 and derive their toxicity from COX-1 inhibition. Newer retinoids with reduced toxicity, increased efficacy, or both (e.g., 9-cis-retinoic acid) are being investigated. Promising chemopreventive drugs are also being developed from dietary substances (e.g., green and black tea polyphenols, soy isoflavones, curcumin, phenethyl isothiocyanate, sulforaphane, lycopene, indole-3-carbinol, perillyl alcohol). Basic and translational research necessary to progress in chemopreventive agent development includes, for example, (1) molecular and genomic biomarkers that can be used for risk assessment and as surrogate end points in clinical studies, (2) animal carcinogenesis models that mimic human disease (including transgenic and gene knockout mice), and (3) novel agent treatment regimens (e.g., local delivery to cancer targets, agent combinations, and pharmacodynamically guided dosing).

Development of new cancer chemoprevention agents: role of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and intermediate endpoint biomarker monitoring.

Recently, several promising strategies have been advanced for improving the efficiency of new agent development. These include pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and intermediate endpoint biomarker (IEB) monitoring. Here, we review their essential role as practical tools for guiding the evaluation of agents for cancer chemoprevention (CP) and provide examples of CP agents that utilize these approaches. Several important categories of IEBs are delineated, including histologically based (intraepithelial neoplasias and nuclear morphometry). The use of select IEBs combined with a Bayesian method for clinical trial monitoring for rapid identification of ineffective or promising agents is discussed. The similarities between IEB and TDM are described. Finally, we present future tools for enhanced monitoring of CP agents that will impact on laboratory medicine and are also applicable to many other drug classes, e.g., laser capture microdissection and cDNA chip microarrays that assess gene expression patterns of precancerous and cancerous lesions.

Aromatase inhibitors as potential cancer chemopreventives.

Epidemiological and experimental evidence strongly supports a role for estrogens in the development and growth of breast tumors. A role for estrogen in prostate neoplasia has also been postulated. Therefore, one chemopreventive strategy for breast and prostate cancers is to decrease estrogen production. This can be accomplished by inhibiting aromatase, the enzyme that catalyzes the final, rate-limiting step in estrogen biosynthesis. The use of aromatase inhibitors is of clinical interest for cancer therapy, and selective, potent aromatase inhibitors have been developed. Several of these agents have demonstrated chemopreventive efficacy in animal models. The rationale for the use of aromatase inhibitors as chemopreventives and identification of inhibitors to serve as potential chemopreventive agents are the subjects of this review. After background information regarding aromatase is presented, the data for each inhibitor are summarized separately. The discussion focuses on those inhibitors that are clinically available or in clinical trials, including: aminoglutethimide (Cytadren), rogletimide, fadrozole hydrochloride, liarozole hydrochloride, anastrozole (Arimidex), letrozole, vorozole, formestane, exemestane, and atamestane. On the basis of results from preclinical studies, aromatase inhibitors may be promising agents for clinical trials in populations at high risk for developing estrogen-dependent cancers. Total suppression of aromatase may have adverse effects, as is evident in postmenopausal women (increased osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, and urogenital atrophy). However, on the basis of preclinical studies of chemopreventive efficacy and chemotherapeutic applications of aromatase inhibitors showing dose-response efficacy, it may be possible to obtain chemopreventive effects without total suppression of aromatase and circulating estrogen levels. Suppressing local estrogen production may be an alternative strategy, as suggested by the discovery of a unique transcriptional promoter of aromatase gene expression, I.4, in breast adipose tissue. The development of drugs that target this promoter region may be possible.

Preclinical drug development paradigms for chemopreventives.

Preclinical screening studies and animal efficacy testing models currently are used by the National Cancer Institute's chemoprevention drug discovery program to assess and identify chemical agents and natural products that may have the potential to prevent human cancer. Identification of potential cancer preventing agents begins by subjecting each compound to a sequential series of short-term, in vitro prescreens of mechanistic, biochemical assays to provide quantitative data to help establish an early indication of chemopreventive efficacy and to assist in prioritizing agents for further evaluation in longer-term, in vitro transformation bioassays and whole animal models. Promising chemical agents or combinations of agents that work through different inhibitory mechanisms subsequently are tested in well-established, chemically induced, animal tumor models, which include models of the lung, bladder, mammaries, prostate, and skin. These preclinical bioassays afford a strategic framework for evaluating agents according to defined criteria, and not only provide evidence of agent efficacy, but also serve to generate valuable dose-response, toxicity, and pharmacokinetic data required prior to phase I clinical safety testing. Based on preclinical efficacy and toxicity screening studies, only the most successful agents considered to have potential as human chemopreventives progress into clinical chemoprevention trials.

Farnesyl protein transferase inhibitors as potential cancer chemopreventives.

Among the most important targets for chemopreventive intervention and drug development are deregulated signal transduction pathways. Ras proteins serve as central connectors between signals generated at the plasma membrane and nuclear effectors; thus, disrupting the Ras signaling pathway could have significant potential as a cancer chemopreventive strategy. Target organs for Ras-based chemopreventive strategies include those associated with activating ras mutations (e.g., colorectum, pancreas, and lung) and those carrying aberrations in upstream element(s), such as growth factors and their receptors. Ras proteins require posttranslational modification with a farnesyl moiety for both normal and oncogenic activity. Inhibitors of the enzyme that catalyzes this reaction, farnesyl protein transferase (FPT) should, therefore, inhibit Ras-dependent proliferative activity in cancerous and precancerous lesions (J. B. Gibbs et al., Cell, 77: 175-178, 1994). Because growth factor networks are redundant, selective inhibition of signaling pathways activated in precancerous and cancerous cells should be possible. Requirements for Ras farnesylation inhibitors include: specificity for FPT compared with other prenyl transferases; specificity for FPT compared with other farnesyl PPi-utilizing enzymes; ability to specifically inhibit processing of mutant K-ras (the most commonly mutated ras gene in human cancers); high potency; selective activity in intact cells; activity in vivo; and lack of toxicity. Numerous FPT inhibitors have been identified through random screening of natural products and by rational design of analogues of the two substrates, farnesyl PPi and the COOH-terminal CAAX motif of Ras tetrapeptides. A possible testing strategy for developing FPT inhibitors as chemopreventive agents includes the following steps: (a) determine FPT inhibitory activity in vitro; (b) evaluate selectivity (relative to other protein prenyl transferases and FPT-utilizing enzymes); (c) determine inhibition of Ras-mediated effects in intact cells; (d) determine inhibition of Ras-mediated effects in vivo (e.g., in nude mouse tumor xenografts); and (e) determine chemopreventive efficacy in vivo (e.g., in carcinogen-induced A/J mouse lung, rat colon, or hamster pancreas).