Impact of Using a Precompleted Consent Form for Procedural Sedation in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare elements discussed during the consent process for procedural sedation in the pediatric emergency department to documentation and parental recall before and after implementation of a standardized consent form. METHODS: This is a mixed-methods study combining retrospective electronic record review and cross-sectional surveys of providers and parents after consent for procedural sedation. Surveys were obtained before and after implementation of a precompleted consent form. Providers' survey responses were compared with consent documentation. Recall of consent elements discussed by linked parent-provider dyads were compared. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-five encounters were reviewed. Pediatric emergency medicine fellows and pediatric emergency department-based pediatricians were more likely to document any benefit (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-2.4) or alternative (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.8-3.9) compared with PEM attendings. Providers were more likely to report discussion of failure to complete the procedure (OR, 7.3; 95% CI, 2.3-23.3) and parents were more likely to recall discussion of this risk (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.0-27.8) in the postintervention group. Based on provider recall, using the precompleted consent form was associated with providers discussing at least 2 of the 3 benefits (84.0% vs 97.2%, P < 0.01), 5 of the 5 risks (31% vs 67.7%, P < 0.01), and improved parental recall of risks (5.7% vs 22.9%, P = 0.03). More providers reported taking less than 1 minute to complete the form in the postimplementation group (12.0% vs 43.7%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a precompleted consent form for procedural sedation was associated with providers reporting decreased time spent completing the consent form and better alignment of key consent elements between reported provider discussion and parental recall.

Consent, refusal of care, and shared decision-making for pediatric patients in emergency settings.

Involving patients or their surrogate decision-makers in their care is an important element of modern medical practice. General consent, informed consent, treatment refusal, and shared decision-making are concepts that are used regularly but can be more complex in pediatric emergency settings. This issue summarizes these concepts and provides case examples that may be encountered. It explains the essential elements of informed consent, the distinction between the informed consent process and the document, how to approach treatment refusal, and approaches to involving patients and their surrogates in shared decision-making. Special circumstances include treatment for sexual and mental health conditions, emancipated minors, mature minors, and situations when custody is unclear. Implementation of these concepts can increase patient satisfaction, resolve conflict, and reduce risk.

10,000 Good Catches: Increasing Safety Event Reporting In A Pediatric Health Care System.

BACKGROUND: In 2014, Children's National Health System's executive leadership team challenged the organization to double the number of voluntary safety event reports submitted over a 3-year period; the intent was to increase reliability and promote our safety culture by hardwiring employee event reporting. METHODS: Following a Donabedian quality improvement framework of structure, process, and outcomes, a multidisciplinary team was formed and areas for improvement were identified. The multidisciplinary team focused on 3 major areas: the perceived ease of reporting (ie, how difficult is it to report an event?); the perceived safety of reporting (ie, will I get in trouble for reporting?); and the perceived impact of reporting (ie, does my report make a difference?) technology, making it safe to report, and how reporting makes a difference. The team developed a key driver diagram and implemented interventions designed to impact the key drivers and to increase reporting. RESULTS: Children's National increased the number of safety event reports from 4,668 in fiscal year 2014 to 10,971 safety event reports in fiscal year 2017. Median event report submission time was decreased by nearly 30%, anonymous reporting decreased by 69%, the number of submitting departments increased by 94%, and the number of reports submitted as "other" decreased from a baseline of 6% to 2%. CONCLUSIONS: Children's National Health System's focus on increasing safety event reporting resulted in increased organizational engagement and attention. This initiative served as a tangible step to improve organizational reliability and the culture of safety and is readily generalizable to other hospitals.

Recurrent Anion Gap Acidosis: An Unusual Presentation of X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy in a Five-year-old Male.

We are presenting a five-year-old male with recurrent anion gap acidosis. During his last admission, it was detected that he had elevated VLCFA and the evaluation discovered that he had X-linked Adrenooleukodystrophy. He had the Addisonian only phenotype without any clinical or radiographic CNS findings. We were unable to find any other reports of this presentation of ALD. If the work-up of recurrent anion gap acidosis does not uncover an etiology, X-linked ALD should be considered in the differential diagnosis.