The relationship of Kraepelian affective temperaments (as measured by TEMPS-I) to the tridimensional personality questionnaire (TPQ).

BACKGROUND: There is considerable uncertainty in the current literature about the relationship between personality dimensions and affective temperaments. METHOD: We compared-in a non-ill 14-26-year-old Italian student population of 1010-the affective temperaments of classic psychiatry conceived as subaffective traits [and measured through the Temperament Assessment of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego-Interview Version (TEMPS-I) in the Akiskal and Mallya Operationalization] with Cloninger's revised Tridimensional Personality Questionnaire (TPQ) deriving from the experimental psychology tradition. RESULTS: The Depressive Temperament (DT) and Harm Avoidance (HA), loaded positively on the same canonical variate, whereas the hyperthymic (HT) strongly, and Novelty Seeking (NS) moderately, loaded negatively. In contrast, the Cyclothymic Temperament (CT) loaded highly positively on a second variate, on which both Novelty Seeking strongly and Harm Avoidance moderately loaded positively. Reward Dependence (RD), Persistence (P), and Irritable Temperament (IT) did not significantly relate to any temperamental and personality constructs. At a subdimensional level of TPQ 'shyness with strangers', 'stoic rigidity', 'detachment', 'fear of uncertainty', 'reflection', and 'anticipatory worry' correlated best with the DT. 'Gregariousness', 'exploratory excitability', 'uninhibited optimism', 'attachment', 'confidence', 'extravagance', 'independence', 'vigor', and 'impulsiveness' correlated best with HT. Lastly, 'anticipatory worry', 'disorderliness', 'sentimentality', and 'fatigability' correlated best with CT. CONCLUSIONS: The data provide concurrent validity to TEMPS-I and, as earlier suggested by Cloninger, indicate that (as expected) high HA and DT are related. High NS is both related to the HT and CT, and (somewhat unexpectedly), the CT is related to high HA. In a more theoretical vein, hyperthymic-novelty seeker can be predicted to be overrepresented among those with high achievement; on the other hand, a moody, restless disposition (a cyclothymic-harm avoidant type) may engage in outrageous behavior and be liable to negative affective arousal. We submit that these considerations could shed some light on the origin of socially adaptive behavior ('sunny' or sanguine types) on the one hand, and borderline conditions, anxious-hostile bipolarity ('dark' types) on the other.

The semi-structured affective temperament interview (TEMPS-I). Reliability and psychometric properties in 1010 14-26-year old students.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and psychometric properties of the Semistructured Affective Temperament Interview, and determine cut-offs for each temperament. METHOD: 1010 Italian students aged between 14 and 26 were evaluated by means of the Akiskal and Mallya criteria in a Semistructured Interview for depressive, cyclothymic, hyperthymic, and irritable temperaments. RESULTS: This instrument has very good reliability and internal consistency. The percentage of subjects with a z-score higher than the second positive standard deviation ( + 2 SD) on the scales of depressive and cyclothymic temperaments are 3.6% and 6.3% (reaching scores of 7/7 and 9/10), respectively. Hyperthymic traits, on the other hand, are widespread in our sample: most subjects are included within the second positive standard deviation ( + 2 SD), and 8.2% of these reach a 7/7 score; therefore, the problem of defining a cut-off for this temperament is still open. By contrast, the irritable temperament is rare, conforming to a non-gaussian distribution, with 2.2% of cases above the second positive standard deviation ( + 2 SD). LIMITATION: The data are based on subject report without collateral information and external validation. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to more accurate definition of cut-offs for individual temperament scales. The standardization of the interview thus makes it possible to compare three out of four temperamental scales, showing the dominant temperamental characteristics for each subject. Prospective studies are needed to demonstrate the stability of these traits over time.

TEMPS-I: delineating the most discriminant traits of the cyclothymic, depressive, hyperthymic and irritable temperaments in a nonpatient population.

BACKGROUND: Although most personality constructs have been standardized in population studies, cyclothymic, depressive, irritable and hyperthymic temperaments putatively linked to mood disorders have been classically derived from clinical observations. METHODS: We therefore administered the semi-structured affective temperament schedule of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego, Interview version (TEMPS-I) -- in its original University of Tennessee operationalization -- to 1010 Italian students aged between 14 and 26. The interview, administered in a randomized format, took 20 min per subject. RESULTS: The semi-structured interview was easy to administer and well accepted by subjects, with no refusals. Principal component analysis with varimax rotation confirmed the hypothesized four-dimensional factor structure of the interview, with good to excellent internal consistency. Furthermore, discriminant analysis and multiple regression provided suggestions for identifying the traits that are most useful in defining a weighted cut-off for each of the temperaments (and which, with minor exceptions, are in agreement with those previously proposed on clinical grounds). In an additional exploratory factorial analysis, a depressive type which loads negatively on hyperthymia was distinguished from cyclothymia; the irritable temperament did not appear to have significant loading on either factor. LIMITATION: All the present analyses were internal to the scale itself, but ongoing studies are comparing them with other systems of temperament as well as testing their clinical cogency for affectively ill populations. CONCLUSION: While more work needs to be done on better operationalization of the irritable temperament, our findings overall support the existence -- in a relatively young nonpatient population -- of cyclothymic, depressive and hyperthymic types according to the classic descriptions of Kraepelin, Kretschmer and Schneider, in their TEMPS-I operationalization. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Coupled with a previous report identifying 10% of the same 14-26-year-old nonpatient population meeting an empirically defined statistical cut-off for these temperaments, the present data define the putative 'fundamental states' that Kraepelin considered to be the personal predisposing anlagé of major affective disorders.

A prospective study of stability and change over 2 years of affective temperaments in 14-18 year-old Italian high school students.

OBJECTIVE: It is generally accepted that temperament is not entirely stable, and that it changes with development, particularly in juvenile subjects; also, some temperaments are believed to be inherently more unstable. There is a great deal of current interest in Kraepelin's thesis that temperamental dysregulation in juvenile subjects represents the constitutional foundation from which the more florid episodes of manic-depressive illness arise; the cyclothymic, hyperthymic, depressive and irritable temperaments under consideration might represent the first observable phenotypes of the genetic diathesis for bipolarity. The analyses on the temperamental attributes in juvenile subjects were undertaken within this theoretical framework. METHOD: We evaluated 206 Italian high school students (14-18 years old) by means of a semi-structured affective temperament interview (TEMPS-I) at T0 and T1 two years later. Age, sex and psychometric properties of TEMPS-I raw scale score and weighted cut-off (as specially weighted linear combination of items) were used as predictive variables of stability. RESULTS: Affective temperaments had a low to moderate level of stability, reaching 60% in the case of subjects with dominant cyclothymic temperament. The stability of the depressive temperament was primarily related to its weighted cut-off. The stability of the hyperthymic temperament appeared related to male sex, young age, and total scale score. Male sex represented the best stability predictor for the cyclothymic temperament as well. The group of subjects with an unstable depressive temperament showed a change toward the dominant cyclothymic temperament, whereas individuals with unstable hyperthymic temperamental traits moved on towards the dominant cyclothymic and depressive temperaments. The irritable construct was the least stable. LIMITATIONS: The infeasibility of a multiwave design represents the main limitation in evaluating the predictors of stability. Furthermore, in the present analyses, the size of the cyclothymic subsample was small. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate considerable fluctuation and instability in depressive and hyperthymic temperaments in mid-adolescence. The cyclothymic temperament appears to be the most stable. Interestingly, cyclothymic moodiness appears more persistent in juvenile males; likewise persistent hyperthymic traits appear more of a "male" attribute. CLINICAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATIONS: We submit that these sex-relevant traits could be important in the risk of developing juvenile bipolarity. Literature review indicates that clinical studies, albeit on small samples, have already provided some support for this thesis. Larger studies on epidemiological samples could be more informative from a public health perspective. A user-friendly affective temperament questionnaire, which is under development, is critical for the methodology of such studies. Our study indicates that the present version of the Akiskal-Malya questionnaire can be easily used post-pubertally. Age adjustment must be considered for younger subjects.