The role of preoperative prostatic shape in the recovery of urinary continence after robotic radical prostatectomy: a single cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: To explore the role of preoperative MRI prostate shape in urinary incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: Patients were stratified into four groups based on the mpMRI prostatic apex shape: Group A (prostatic apex overlapping the membranous urethra anteriorly and posteriorly), Group B and C (overlap of the prostatic apex of the anterior or posterior membranous urethra, respectively) and Group D (no overlap). Preoperative variables and intraoperative data were compared. Continence recovery was defined as no pad/day or 1 safety pad/day by an outpatient evaluation performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after RARP. RESULTS: One hundred patients underwent RARP were classified as belonging to Group A (n = 30), Group B (n = 16), Group C (n = 14), and Group D (n = 40). Group D showed a significantly more favorable urinary continence recovery after RARP respect to all the other shapes presenting any forms of overlapping (HR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.1, p = 0.007). The estimated HR remained substantially unchanged after adjusting by age, body mass index, CCI, prostate volume, and bladder neck sparing (HR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.2, p = 0.016). The continence recovery median time was 9 months for Group A + B + C (95% CI 5-11) and 4 months for Group D (95% CI 2-6) (p = 0.023). CONCLUSION: Shape D showed a better continence recovery when compared to other shapes presenting any kind of overlapping of the prostatic apex over the membranous urethra.

Analysis of Symmetry Stability Following Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction and Contralateral Management in 582 Patients with Long-Term Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to analyse the long-term outcomes following breast reconstruction and contralateral management to evaluate the stability of breast symmetry and patient satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of women who had undergone implant-based monolateral breast reconstruction and contralateral management. Patients answered the BREAST-Q reconstruction module. Two reviewers analysed the post-operative outcomes of the patients included and compiled the Kroll Scale. Patients were divided into three groups: implant-based contralateral management, breast reduction and mastopexy. The Fisher's exact test was applied to the results. RESULTS: From the BREAST-Q analysis, the group of patients undergoing contralateral breast augmentation achieved significantly better results regarding the ability to wear clothing (p â‰ª 0.001), symmetry (p â‰ª 0.001), psychosocial well-being (p â‰ª 0.001) and physical well-being (p â‰ª 0.001). From the analysis of the Kroll Scale, the group of implant-based contralateral management received the highest score for symmetry (p â‰ª 0.001), shape (p â‰ª 0.001) and aesthetic result overall (p â‰ª 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study was the first to use BREAST-Q to analyse the stability of breast symmetry following breast reconstruction with long-term results. The implant-based contralateral management was the most effective procedure for achieving a stable and lasting result to obtain the high satisfaction of patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Management of pancreatic cysts: a review of the current guidelines.

The number of patients diagnosed with cystic pancreatic neoplasms (CPN) has increased significantly during the last decade due to the widespread use of cross-sectional imaging. These CPN consist of a heterogeneous group of neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions with variable histopathological features, clinical presentation, and outcome. Until now we are not able to reliably identify all CPNs that require additional analysis, surgical resection or surveillance. Hence, physicians and surgeons are confronted with a difficult dilemma as they do not want to miss a diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma, but this often leads to the risk of over- or misuse of diagnostic examinations with a risk of complications and increased health care costs. Currently, four expert consensus guidelines on cystic lesions of the pancreas are available. Unfortunately, recommendations vary considerably between these guidelines. The purpose of this review therefore was to compare the different guidelines and elaborate upon the topics where these guidelines disagree.