Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
Health Phys ; 104(1): 1-8, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23192082

ABSTRACT

The goal of establishing prompt localization of the malignant spread or recurrence of a tumor has found a powerful solution in the definition of follow-up protocols, which include the indication for CT scans on an annual or semiannual basis. In the case of long-surviving patients, however, this approach will lead to a considerable integrated dose level over a period of several years after recovery from the illness. Pathologies treated primarily by surgery and/or chemotherapy have been considered, not taking into account cancers treated with adjuvant or radical radiotherapy. Given that the most likely protocols for these cancers often call for total body scans, an estimation of the consequent effective and organ doses can be performed with acceptable accuracy. The data acquired from five centers have been collected and the related effective and organ doses calculated by means of IMPACT software. Use of the effective dose concept, however, has lately become the subject of criticism, and the recently proposed Effective Risk Model has therefore also been applied. The evaluated absolute additional risk of second tumor induction ranges between 0.1% and 10%, depending primarily on age and pathology. These results depict this additional risk as an issue of significant importance for clinical practice. A revision of follow-up and scan parameter protocols, as well as the introduction of new algorithms for dose reduction, could significantly improve the risk-benefit ratio for all the pathologies studied.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Second Primary/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms, Second Primary/etiology , Neoplasms/mortality , Radiation Dosage , Survivors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Child , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Risk
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 142(2-4): 201-8, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20858680

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate radiation doses to the patients and operators during interventional cardiology procedures, with a particular focus on the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Patient doses for 5549 diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and 76 TAVI were examined, as well as occupational doses to Cardiology Department operators. The average patient dose for TAVI was double that of PTCA and six times higher than a simple CA; statistically significant differences were shown in the average patient dose for both transfemoral and transapical access; the measurements show a corresponding increase in the average occupational dose for the cardiologist. Interventional cardiology could increase the collective dose and occupationally exposed worker doses; this increase could be significant if the use of certain procedures is extended to younger people; particular attention in the choice of procedure, optimisation and staff education and organisation is therefore suggested.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Radiography, Interventional/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring
3.
Radiother Oncol ; 56(1): 85-95, 2000 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10869759

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In vivo dosimetry is widely considered to be an important tool for quality assurance in external radiotherapy. INTRODUCTION: In this study we report on our experience over more than 4 years in systematic in vivo dosimetry with diodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November '94 an in vivo entrance dosimetry check was performed for every new patient irradiated at one of our treatment units (Linac 6/100, 6 MV X-rays). Diodes were calibrated in terms of entrance dose; appropriate correction factors had been previously assessed (taking SSDs, field width, wedge, oblique incidence and blocking tray into account) and were individually applied to in vivo diode readings. The in vivo measured entrance dose was compared with the expected one, with a 5% action level; if a larger deviation was found, all treatment parameters were verified, and the in vivo dosimetry check was repeated. During the period November '94-May '99, 2824 measurements on 1433 patients were collected. RESULTS: Nine out of 1433 (0.63%) serious systematic errors (leading to a 5% or more on the delivered dose to the PTV) were detected by in vivo dosimetry; four out of nine would produce a 10% or more error if not detected. The rate of serious systematic errors detected by an independent check of treatment chart and MU calculation was found to be 1.5%, showing that less than 1/3 of the errors escapes this check. One hundred and twelve out of 1433 (7.8%) patients had more than one check: the rate of second checks was significantly higher for breast patients (31/250, 12.4%) against non-breast patients (81/1183, 6.8%, P=0.003). A number of patients demonstrated a persistent relatively large error even after two or more checks. For almost all patients the cause of the deviation was assessed; the most frequent cause was the difficulty in correctly positioning the patient and/or the diode. When analyzing the distribution of the deviations between measured and expected entrance doses (excluding first checks in the case of repetition of the in vivo dosimetry control) the mean deviation was 0.4% with a standard deviation equal to 3.0%. The rates of deviations larger than 5 and 7% were 9.9 and 2.6%, respectively. When considering the same data taking the average deviation in the case of opposed beams, the SD became 2.6% and the rates of deviations larger than 5 and 7%, respectively, 5.2 and 0.8%. When dividing the beams according to their orientation, significantly higher rates of large deviations (>5 and 7%) were found for oblique and posterior-anterior (PA) fields against lateral and anterior-posterior (AP) fields (P<0.05). Similarly, higher rates of large deviations were found for wedged fields against unwedged fields (P<0.03) and for blocked fields against unblocked fields (P<0.01). When dividing the data according to the anatomical district, accuracy was worse for breast (mean deviation 0.1%, 1 SD: 3.5%) and neck AP-PA fields (mean deviation 1%, 1 SD: 3,4%). Better accuracy was found for vertebrae (0.1%, 1 SD 2. 1%) and brain patients (-0.7%, 1 SD: 2.6%). During the considered period, in vivo dosimetry was also able to promptly detect a systematic error caused by a wrong resetting of the simulator height couch indicator, with a consequent error in the estimate of patient thickness of about 4 cm. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, systematic in vivo dosimetry demonstrated to be a valid tool for quality assurance, both in detecting systematic errors which may escape the data transfer/MU calculation check and in giving an effective way of estimating the accuracy of treatment delivery.


Subject(s)
Radiotherapy Dosage/standards , Cohort Studies , Humans , Quality Control , Radiation Dosage , Radiotherapy/standards
4.
Radiother Oncol ; 45(3): 271-4, 1997 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9426121

ABSTRACT

The execution of an independent control of monitor units (MU) and dose distribution calculation, together with a check of the data reported in the treatment chart is an effective tool in strongly reducing the occurrence of systematic errors before treatment delivery. In this paper we report the results of the analysis of 6272 controls (about 5000 patients) registered over more than 5 years; 70 serious errors (producing a deviation larger than 5% from the prescribed daily dose) and 147 minor errors were detected and corrected before the start of the treatment. The error rate was found to be strongly operator-dependent (serious error rate ranging from 0.3 to 2.5% when considering different operators). A time-trend analysis showed a significant reduction of serious errors, i.e. 1.5% in the period from September 1991 to April 1994 compared to 0.9% in the period from April 1994 to November 1996. However, even if the double check was highly effective in revealing human errors, three serious systematic errors (errors occurring during the calculation/planning/transcription phases) escaped the control and were detected by diode in vivo dosimetry during the period October 1994 to November 1996 (in 650 patients controlled).


Subject(s)
Medical Errors , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Humans
5.
Radiother Oncol ; 30(3): 267-70, 1994 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8209011

ABSTRACT

Skin-sparing benefits derived from the use of megavoltage photon beams can be strongly reduced when filters are inserted between the source and the patient. The use of plastic masks for immobilizing the patient is the most important cause of this reduction in head and neck treatments. The influence of thermoplastics, commercially available for patient immobilization systems (Orfit Raycast (Luxilon Ind. Co.), Posicast (Sinmed bv) and Optimold (WFR Aquaplast Corp.)), on the patient skin dose value has been investigated by using an NE2534 'Markus' chamber. Indicative measurements with moulded masks (carried out with 2-mm Orfit and 3.2-mm Optimold layers) show significant differences between masks moulded with the two thermoplastics.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Immobilization , Masks , Plastics , Radiotherapy, High-Energy/instrumentation , Skin/radiation effects , Acrylic Resins , Equipment Design , Humans , Models, Structural , Radiotherapy Dosage , Skin/pathology
6.
Med Dosim ; 19(2): 73-4, 1994.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7916978

ABSTRACT

The interaction between photon or electron fields and cables of ionization chambers induces the flow of leakage currents affecting the measured signal; this "cable effect" is particularly important when large electron and photon fields are used, i.e., when large portions of cable are irradiated. Therefore it is more interesting to investigate cable-induced effects when ionization chambers are used for clinical situations where large fields are used, for example, total body and total skin electron irradiations (TSEI). In TSEI fields these effects are particularly important. Cable and connector effects using an NE2534 Markus chamber in total skin irradiation conditions with different electron energies (from 1.6 to 4.5 MeV) have been investigated. These effects are significant and show that for TSI dosimetry it is vital to take them into account.


Subject(s)
Radiometry , Whole-Body Irradiation , Electrons , Humans , Photons , Radiotherapy/instrumentation , Radiotherapy Dosage , Skin/radiation effects
7.
Radiother Oncol ; 29(3): 336-40, 1993 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8127984

ABSTRACT

Portal in vivo dosimetry is a very attractive tool for patient dose measurements because of the large amount of information that portal film systems can easily collect, once positioned at the exit surface of the patient. The first step in the verification of the reliability of portal films as in vivo dosimeters is the evaluation of the agreement between exit patient dose profiles and optical density profiles measured on the portal film. We checked the possibilities for exit dose measurements of a commercial portal film system (Film Kodak X-Omat V and Localization Kodak Cassette) verifying the agreement between relative exit doses (measured by ionization chamber and film dosimetry, calculated by our treatment planning system (Cadplan Dosetek)) and relative optical densities on portal films in cubic homogeneous and inhomogeneous, cylindrical and humanoid phantoms. In particular, a good agreement (mean difference in absolute value: 2%) between optical densities and calculated exit doses for the Rando phantom were found, once the optical densities values are corrected for an inverse square correction factor, taking into account the variation of the profile of the phantom.


Subject(s)
Film Dosimetry , Radiotherapy Dosage , Absorptiometry, Photon , Equipment Design , Film Dosimetry/instrumentation , Film Dosimetry/methods , Humans , Models, Structural , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods
8.
Radiol Med ; 86(4): 521-3, 1993 Oct.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8248592

ABSTRACT

Human mistakes are a major source of error from the definition to the execution of a treatment planning. An unrevealed serious human error can cause therapy to fail therefore it is of fundamental importance to eliminate serious human errors during MU calculation. In this work the human error incidence in MU calculation is evaluated by an independent check. The investigation refers to 1,926 controls collected in about 18 months. Serious daily errors rate (errors causing a 5%, or higher, discrepancy on the daily reference dose) was 1.4% (27/1926). Serious global errors incidence (errors causing a 5%, or higher, discrepancy on the total reference dose) was 0.9% (15/1,731). The data show that the human error in MU calculation is not negligible; they also indicate the value of the independent control of MU, which is an important tool for quality assurance in radiotherapy (like in vivo dosimetry and portal imaging.


Subject(s)
Radiotherapy Dosage , Bias , Humans , Mathematics
9.
Radiother Oncol ; 28(1): 86-8, 1993 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8234876

ABSTRACT

Human mistakes are an important source of error in all steps of radiotherapy planning and their incidence should be investigated. As has been recognized by different authors and by the ICRU [4], the human error rate in the calculation of monitor units (MU) is relatively high. At our institute, we measured the human error rate in the calculation of MU by an independent check of the calculation. From September 1991 to June 1992 we identified and corrected 17 serious errors (deviation from the prescribed dose > or = 5%) over 890 controls (1.9%) (daily dose errors). We also found a serious global dose error rate (i.e. the errors induced on the total reference dose for the complete course of the treatment) of 1.3% (9/685) during the period November 1991-June 1992. These values suggest the importance of human errors in the calculation of MU and also confirm the validity of the independent check of MU calculation as one of the simplest ways of avoiding erroneous dose delivery by incorrect calculation of MU.


Subject(s)
Radiotherapy Dosage , Humans , Mathematics , Quality Assurance, Health Care
10.
Radiother Oncol ; 27(2): 167-70, 1993 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8356228

ABSTRACT

The development of an original conformal technique for neck cancer is in progress in our Institute. This technique uses a computer-controlled moving bar (CCMB): a portion of a blocking bar rotates during the rotation of the gantry in a 2 pi arc field in order to shield the spinal cord over the whole irradiated volume. This technique should solve in a relatively simple way some problems for different clinical situations when cervical node irradiation is required together with the primary tumor. The technique has been tested in an acrylic cylindrical phantom and in the humanoid RANDO phantom for two different irradiation conditions (neck completely bent and partially aligned).


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation , Humans , Models, Structural
11.
Radiol Med ; 84(3): 303-9, 1992 Sep.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1410676

ABSTRACT

The six-field total skin electron irradiation (TSEI) technique needs an accurate preliminary dosimetric study. The American Association Physics in Medicine (AAPM) defined a dosimetric protocol that recommends the careful dosimetry of the horizontal, the dual and the six-dual fields by using both a cubic and a cylindrical phantoms. In our Institute, in a TSEI development program, we carried out the preliminary dosimetry according to AAPM criteria. We also investigated some dosimetric problems--e.g., the so-called "cable effect", which takes place when the detector cable in a TSEI field is not well shielded, polarity effects and photon contamination. As to the "cable effect", it is especially marked with the Markus NE2534 chamber; moreover, this effect, if not considered, can lead to overestimation of X-rays contamination.


Subject(s)
Skin/radiation effects , Whole-Body Irradiation/methods , Calibration , Filtration/instrumentation , Health Physics , Humans , Models, Structural , Radiotherapy Dosage , Societies, Medical , United States , Whole-Body Irradiation/instrumentation
12.
Radiol Med ; 84(3): 310-6, 1992 Sep.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1410677

ABSTRACT

The growing interest for conformal radiotherapy originates from the need of giving the prescribed dose to the target volume, by sparing, at the same time, surrounding healthy tissues and organs. More dose to the target volume with respect to the healthy tissues always increases the curative possibilities of the treatment. However, the development of conformal techniques implies an increased complexity of the treatment and the solution of many technical and dosimetric problems. In our Institute we are developing new conformal techniques, based on the use of moving bars driven by a computer-controlled system in arc therapy. This paper refers to the conclusion of the preliminary part of our work: a movement (translating or rotating) of bars in arc therapy seems to have good chances to tailor dose distribution in a relatively simple way. We realized two mechanical systems driven by computer for translating and rotating movements of a bar. The two techniques have been tested by TLD and film dosimetry on acrylic phantoms. We present the results of these tests, and describe technical problems and the clinical possibilities of this method.


Subject(s)
Radiation Protection/methods , Radiotherapy/methods , Equipment Design , Humans , Mathematics , Microcomputers , Models, Structural , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Radiotherapy/instrumentation , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods
13.
Radiol Med ; 84(3): 317-21, 1992 Sep.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1410678

ABSTRACT

The development of conformal techniques by movement of bars in pendular fields requires a careful examination of many physical and dosimetric problems: bar-critical organ synchronization problems, dose calculation problems, and problems relative to the "shadow effect". The use of a bar in an arc field, causes to a slow gradient of dose between shielded zone and target volume with a loss of homogeneity in dose distribution. This effect is well known ("shadow effect") and depends on the fact that different points spend different times beyond the bar's shadow. In this work the problem is investigated in the case of moving bar technique, mainly for dose calculation possibilities; then the possibility is analyzed of optimizing dose distribution by means of filters whose profile can be calculated for simple geometric conditions (fixed bar on the isocenter without considering the profile of the patient). These filters will be made in our Institute and they will be tested in various conditions, for both fixed bars and moving bars in arc fields.


Subject(s)
Radiation Protection/methods , Radiotherapy/methods , Equipment Design , Humans , Mathematics , Microcomputers , Models, Structural , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Radiotherapy/instrumentation , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods
14.
Med Phys ; 19(5): 1263-6, 1992.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1435607

ABSTRACT

The use of immobilization plastic masks in head and neck radiotherapy can partially eliminate skin benefits derived from the utilization of megavoltage photon beams. Filters and blocks between the patient and the accelerator can further increase the skin dose value. In this study, the increase in surface dose due to 2 and 3.2 mm of plastic material utilized for patient immobilization was measured. Then, the effect of blocking trays, wedges, and blocks on skin dose in typical conditions for head and neck irradiation was evaluated. The measurements were obtained with a NE2534 chamber (Markus type) on a perspex phantom for 6 MeV x-rays from an accelerator.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation Dosage , Radiotherapy/instrumentation , Skin/radiation effects , Humans , Immobilization , Models, Anatomic , Plastics , Radiotherapy/methods , Radiotherapy Dosage
16.
Radiol Med ; 80(4 Suppl 1): 88-92, 1990 Oct.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2251426

ABSTRACT

A modified IORT procedure with electron beams, used at HSR-Mi, has been illustrated. The design and the technical innovations of our IORT applicator system are presented. The dosimetric properties of this system for a variety of energies and applicator sizes are documented.


Subject(s)
Electrons , Radiotherapy/methods , Hospitals , Humans , Intraoperative Period , Italy , Radiotherapy/instrumentation , Radiotherapy Dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...