Cellular and humoral immune responses to Borrelia burgdorferi antigens in patients with culture-positive early Lyme disease.

We determined cellular and humoral immune responses to Borrelia burgdorferi lysate and to recombinant flagellin (FlaB), OspC, and OspA in acute- and convalescent-phase samples from 39 culture-positive patients with erythema migrans and in 20 healthy control subjects. During the acute illness, a median of 4 days after the onset of erythema migrans, 51% of the patients had proliferative cellular responses and 72% had antibody responses to at least one of the borrelial antigens tested. During convalescence, at the conclusion of antibiotic therapy, 64% of the patients had proliferative cellular reactivity and 95% had antibody reactivity with at least one of the spirochetal antigens tested. In both acute- and convalescent-phase samples, cellular immune responses were found as frequently to OspA as to OspC and FlaB. Although antibody responses were also frequently seen to OspC and FlaB, only a few patients had marginal antibody reactivity with OspA. The percentage of patients with proliferative responses was similar in those with clinical evidence of localized or disseminated infection, whereas humoral reactivity was found more often in those with disseminated disease. We conclude that cellular and humoral responses to B. burgdorferi antigens are often found among patients with early Lyme disease. In contrast with the other antigens tested, cellular but not humoral reactivity was often found with OspA.

Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant Borrelia burgdorferi outer surface protein A vaccine against lyme disease in healthy children and adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: A recombinant lipoprotein outer surface protein A (OspA) Lyme disease (LD) vaccine (LYMErix) has been shown to be safe and effective in preventing LD in adults and in adolescents 15 years of age and older. Children are at risk for developing LD. This clinical study was conducted to address the safety and immunogenicity of LD vaccine in children 4 to 18 years of age. METHODS: A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted at 17 investigational sites in Lyme-endemic areas in the United States. Immunogenicity data from this study also were compared with data obtained from the adult efficacy study. A total of 4090 healthy children and adolescents (age range: 4-18; mean age: 10.4 years) were randomized; 4087 were vaccinated, and a subset of 301 children participated in the immunogenicity analysis. Children were randomized to receive either 30 microgram of LD vaccine (N = 3063) or placebo (N = 1024) on a 0, 1, 12-month schedule. Safety assessments evaluated both solicited (local: redness, swelling, and pain; general: fever, headache, fatigue, arthralgia, and rash) and unsolicited adverse events. Serum specimens were collected at month 0 or month 2, and months 6, 12, and 13. RESULTS: Solicited reactogenicity data revealed a higher incidence of local injection site reactions and general symptoms (fever, headache, fatigue, and arthralgia) in vaccine than placebo recipients. The majority of events were limited in duration (mean: 2-3 days) and were mild to moderate in severity. The total IgG anti-OspA geometric mean titer (GMT) in the pediatric vaccine recipients at month 13 was as good as and statistically higher than the GMT in the adult cohort at month 13 (27 485 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay units [EL.U]/mL vs 8216 EL.U /mL). All of the pediatric vaccine recipients attained a level of antibody concentration >/=1400 EL.U/mL (proposed seroprotective level) compared with 90% of adults attaining levels >/=1400 EL.U/mL in the efficacy trial. CONCLUSIONS: LD vaccine administered on a 0, 1, 12-month schedule generally is well tolerated and immunogenic in children 4 to 18 years of age. The safety profile consists of mild to moderate local injection site reactions and flu-like symptoms of limited duration and did not worsen with subsequent injections. IgG GMT at month 13 was threefold higher than the month 13 GMT obtained in the adult efficacy study. This higher immune response in children should provide protection against LD.

Atovaquone and azithromycin for the treatment of babesiosis.

BACKGROUND: Babesiosis is a tick-borne, malaria-like illness known to be enzootic in southern New England. A course of clindamycin and quinine is the standard treatment, but this regimen frequently causes adverse reactions and occasionally fails. A promising alternative treatment is atovaquone plus azithromycin. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, nonblinded, randomized trial of the two regimens in 58 subjects with non-life-threatening babesiosis on Nantucket, on Block Island, and in southern Connecticut. The subjects were assigned to receive either atovaquone (750 mg every 12 hours) and azithromycin (500 mg on day 1 and 250 mg per day thereafter) for seven days (40 subjects) or clindamycin (600 mg every 8 hours) and quinine (650 mg every 8 hours) for seven days (18 subjects). RESULTS: Adverse effects were reported by 15 percent of the subjects who received atovaquone and azithromycin, as compared with 72 percent of those who received clindamycin and quinine (P<0.001). The most common adverse effects with atovaquone and azithromycin were diarrhea and rash (each in 8 percent of the subjects); with clindamycin and quinine the most common adverse effects were tinnitus (39 percent), diarrhea (33 percent), and decreased hearing (28 percent). Symptoms had resolved three months after the start of therapy in 65 percent of those who received atovaquone and azithromycin and 73 percent of those who received clindamycin and quinine (P=0.66), and after six months no patient in either group had symptoms. Three months after the completion of the assigned regimen, no parasites could be seen on microscopy, and no Babesia microti DNA was detected in the blood of any subject. CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of babesiosis, a regimen of atovaquone and azithromycin is as effective as a regimen of clindamycin and quinine and is associated with fewer adverse reactions.

Safety and immunogenicity profile of a recombinant outer-surface protein A Lyme disease vaccine: clinical trial of a 3-dose schedule at 0, 1, and 2 months.

OBJECTIVES: This study compared the tolerability of a Lyme disease vaccine administered intramuscularly at 0 and 1 months with that of a vaccine administered at 0, 1, and 2 months to determine (1) whether adding a third dose of vaccine 1 month after the second would affect the safety profile, and (2) whether a shortened vaccination schedule of 0, 1, and 2 months would provide an immune response similar to that obtained with vaccine administered at 0, 1, and 12 months. BACKGROUND: An efficacy trial of a Lyme disease vaccine had demonstrated safety and efficacy against definite (clinically manifested and laboratory-confirmed) Lyme disease after 3 doses at 0, 1, and 12 months and resulted in 90% of subjects having titers > or =1400 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay units (EL.U)/mL (the proposed seroprotective level for 1 tick season). METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized study assessed the safety and efficacy of different doses of a recombinant outer-surface protein A (OspA) vaccine in 956 volunteers aged 17 to 72 years from 3 Lyme disease-endemic sites. Blood samples were collected at months 0, 2, 3, 12, and 13 to assess total immunoglobulin-G anti-OspA titers. RESULTS: Most adverse events were transient and mild to moderate. The geometric mean antibody titer increased 2.8-fold from month 2 (1786 EL.U/mL to 4842 EL.U/mL), and approximately 90% of the volunteers had a titer > or =1400 and 99% had a titer > or =400 EL.U/mL (the mini- mum seroprotective level at any given time) after the third dose. An antibody kinetics model predicts that protection would last for a typical tick-transmission season. CONCLUSIONS: In volunteers aged 17 to 72 years, 3 doses of vaccine administered in 2 months was well tolerated, more immunogenic than 2 doses, and provided a higher probability of protection before exposure or travel to Lyme disease-endemic areas.

Evaluation of two-test serodiagnostic method for early Lyme disease in clinical practice.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend a two-test approach for the serodiagnosis of Lyme disease (LD), with EIA testing followed by Western immunoblotting (WB) of EIA-equivocal and -positive specimens. This approach was compared with a simplified two-test approach (WB of EIA equivocals only) and WB alone for early LD. Case-patients with erythema migrans (EM) rash >/=5 cm were recruited from three primary-care practices in LD-endemic areas to provide acute- (S1) and convalescent-phase serum specimens (S2). The simplified approach had the highest sensitivity when either S1 or S2 samples were tested, nearly doubling when S2 were tested, while decreasing slightly for the other two approaches. Accordingly, the simplified approach had the lowest negative likelihood ratio for either S1 or S2. For early LD with EM, the simplified approach performed well and was less costly than the other testing approaches since less WB is required.

Vaccination against Lyme disease with recombinant Borrelia burgdorferi outer-surface lipoprotein A with adjuvant. Lyme Disease Vaccine Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The risk of acquiring Lyme disease is high in areas in which the disease is endemic, and the development of a safe and effective vaccine is therefore important. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial involving 10,936 subjects who lived in areas of the United States in which Lyme disease is endemic. Participants received an injection of either recombinant Borrelia burgdorferi outer-surface lipoprotein A (OspA) with adjuvant or placebo at enrollment and 1 and 12 months later. In cases of suspected Lyme disease, culture of skin lesions, polymerase-chain-reaction testing, or serologic testing was done. Serologic testing was performed 12 and 20 months after study entry to detect asymptomatic infections. RESULTS: In the first year, after two injections, 22 subjects in the vaccine group and 43 in the placebo group contracted definite Lyme disease (P=0.009); vaccine efficacy was 49 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 15 to 69 percent). In the second year, after the third injection, 16 vaccine recipients and 66 placebo recipients contracted definite Lyme disease (P<0.001); vaccine efficacy was 76 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 58 to 86 percent). The efficacy of the vaccine in preventing asymptomatic infection was 83 percent in the first year and 100 percent in the second year. Injection of the vaccine was associated with mild-to-moderate local or systemic reactions lasting a median of three days. CONCLUSIONS: Three injections of vaccine prevented most definite cases of Lyme disease or asymptomatic B. burgdorferi infection.

Persistent parasitemia after acute babesiosis.

BACKGROUND: Babesiosis, a zoonosis caused by the protozoan Babesia microti, is usually not treated when the symptoms are mild, because the parasitemia appears to be transient. However, the microscopical methods used to diagnose this infection are insensitive, and few infected people have been followed longitudinally. We compared the duration of parasitemia in people who had received specific antibabesial therapy with that in silently infected people who had not been treated. METHODS: Forty-six babesia-infected subjects were identified from 1991 through 1996 in a prospective, community-based study designed to detect episodes of illness and of seroconversion among the residents of southeastern Connecticut and Block Island, Rhode Island. Subjects with acute babesial illness were monitored every 3 months for up to 27 months by means of thin blood smears, Bab. microti polymerase-chain-reaction assays, serologic tests, and questionnaires. RESULTS: Babesial DNA persisted in the blood for a mean of 82 days in 24 infected subjects without specific symptoms who received no specific therapy. Babesial DNA persisted for 16 days in 22 acutely ill subjects who received clindamycin and quinine therapy (P=0.03), of whom 9 had side effects from the treatment. Among the subjects who did not receive specific therapy, symptoms of babesiosis persisted for a mean of 114 days in five subjects with babesial DNA present for 3 or more months and for only 15 days in seven others in whom the DNA was detectable for less than 3 months (P<0.05); one subject had recrudescent disease after two years. CONCLUSIONS: When left untreated, silent babesial infection may persist for months or even years. Although treatment with clindamycin and quinine reduces the duration of parasitemia, infection may still persist and recrudesce and side effects are common. Improved treatments are needed.