Differences in macular capillary parameters between healthy black and white subjects with Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCTA).

PURPOSE: To investigate if there are differences in macular capillaries between black and white subjects using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and identify potential factors underlying the epidemiologically-based higher vulnerability of black populations to diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: This prospective, observational cross-sectional study included 93 eyes of 47 healthy subjects with no medical history and ocular history who self-identified as black or white and were matched for age, sex, refractive error, and image quality. Subjects underwent OCTA imaging (RTVue-XR Avanti) of the superficial (SCP) and deep (DCP) capillary plexuses and choriocapillaris. AngioAnalytics was used to analyze vessel density (VD) and choriocapillaris % blood flow area (BFA) in the 1mm-diameter fovea, parafovea, and 3mm-diameter circular area including the fovea and parafovea (3x3mm image). Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) was also analyzed. Linear mixed models were used to evaluate for differences between the study groups. RESULTS: Compared to the white subjects in this study, black subjects were found to have: lower foveal VD in the SCP (p<0.05); lower VD in the parafovea and in the 3x3mm image in the DCP (p<0.05); larger FAZ in SCP and DCP (p<0.05); and decreased choriocapillary BFA in the area underlying the fovea, parafovea, and 3x3mm image (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In our study, our black subjects had decreased macular capillary vasculature compared to matched white subjects, even in early adulthood and the absence of any systemic or ocular conditions. To our knowledge, this is the first report showing that retinal and choriocapillary vascular differences may contribute to racial disparities in vulnerability to DR.

Medial Orbital Wall Reconstruction to Facilitate Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Erosive Polypoidal Sinus Disease.

The authors report the use of a 0.35-mm-thickness nylon implant for medial orbital wall reconstruction to facilitate functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) for severe erosive polypoidal sinus disease while minimizing iatrogenic injuries to the orbital contents. A retrospective chart review identified 4 patients with extensive polypoidal sinus disease who underwent medial orbital wall reconstruction in the setting of FESS. All patients underwent successful reconstruction of bilateral eroded medial orbital walls using a 0.35-mm Supramid Foil Nylon Implant immediately followed by FESS. There were no permanent complications or iatrogenic injuries to the orbital contents due to FESS. All patients experienced improvement in sinus symptoms. Medial orbital wall reconstruction in the setting of erosive polypoidal sinus disease is a useful tool to help facilitate FESS. It allows the sinus surgeon to clear sinus disease aggressively with the orbits being protected from iatrogenic injury.

Posterior keratoconus.

Posterior keratoconus (PKC) is a rare, typically non-inflammatory condition that is characterised by an abnormal posterior corneal curvature, which may be accompanied by overlying stromal opacification. It is usually congenital and can be associated with other ocular and systemic abnormalities. PKC remains a clinical diagnosis, although imaging techniques including ultrasound biomicroscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography may be useful tools for confirmation and classification. Genetic studies should be considered, although no specific genetic defects have been identified thus far. As a potential cause of amblyopia, early diagnosis and management are crucial in maximising visual potential. Occasionally, management considerations may also include surgical intervention, such as corneal transplantation. Intraocular lens power calculation at the time of cataract surgery requires special consideration. Here, we review the present literature on PKC and consider future directions in the management of this rare entity.

Optimizing the antisepsis protocol: Effectiveness of 3 povidone-iodine 1.0% applications versus a single application of povidone-iodine 5.0.

PURPOSE: To determine the minimum effective concentration of povidone-iodine that reduces the bacterial load by 3-log10, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration requirement for antiseptic agents, and to study alternative dosing schedules of povidone-iodine to optimize its bactericidal effect. SETTING: Microbiology Laboratory, Evanston Hospital, Evanston, Illinois, USA. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: A standard 0.5 McFarland solution of Staphylococcus epidermidis was applied to blood agar plates. The plates were treated with a single application of povidone-iodine solutions from 10.0% to 0.1% to define the range of interest. Another set of plates received 3 applications of various povidone-iodine solutions. Microbial growth was evaluated after 24 hours. Standard deviations with 99.0% and 99.9% confidence intervals for each concentration were estimated and used to estimate the minimum concentration that reduced the colony counts by at least 3-log10. RESULTS: Povidone-iodine at 2.5% and higher concentrations was effective in eliminating S epidermidis with a single application. Three 30-second applications of povidone-iodine at concentrations of 0.7% and higher resulted in at least a 3-log10 reduction of colonies. CONCLUSIONS: Povidone-iodine 5.0% has been the standard of care for preoperative ocular antisepsis for 3 decades. Povidone-iodine 0.7% was as effective as a bactericidal agent when applied multiple times. This suggests povidone-iodine 1.0%, applied in three 30-second applications for preoperative surface disinfection might be as effective for preoperative antisepsis.

Video recording of the operating room--is anonymity possible?

BACKGROUND: Video recording in the operating room (OR) has many potential applications for research, quality improvement, and education. Routine video recording is limited by patient and staff privacy concerns, but this may be overcome by creating videos that are deidentified but still retain sufficient video data for intended applications. It is unknown what effect video processing may have on staff perceptions of identifiability in video recordings; this study was designed to investigate this effect. METHODS: We presented OR staff members with short clips of the same staged surgical procedure, each representing different data formats or processing (unaltered video, blurred faces, infrared, and point clouds). Staff rated each video on a Likert scale (1 = anonymous, "no one could identify me"; 10 = not anonymous, "it would be easy to identify me) and provided qualitative comments. RESULTS: Eighty-three staff members agreed to participate. The mean response for the unaltered, blurred faces, infrared, and point cloud videos were 7.05, 3.75, 5.77, and 1.41, respectively (all P < 0.001), demonstrating that postprocessing methods impact perceived anonymity. Staff roles (surgeons versus anesthesiologists versus nurses) were not significantly associated perceptions of identifiability (P ≥ 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that surgical video postprocessing affects OR staff members' perceptions of anonymity and that it is possible to produce videos that retain details about surgical activity while still being perceived as anonymous. These findings are highly relevant to any study that uses video for quality improvement or health care research by providing the first normative data on "deidentification."