Proposal of a New Adverse Event Classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee.

PURPOSE: To develop a new adverse event (AE) classification for the interventional radiology (IR) procedures and evaluate its clinical, research, and educational value compared with the existing Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) classification via an SIR member survey. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A new AE classification was developed by members of the Standards of Practice Committee of the SIR. Subsequently, a survey was created by a group of 18 members from the SIR Standards of Practice Committee and Service Lines. Twelve clinical AE case scenarios were generated that encompassed a broad spectrum of IR procedures and potential AEs. Survey questions were designed to evaluate the following domains: educational and research values, accountability for intraprocedural challenges, consistency of AE reporting, unambiguity, and potential for incorporation into existing quality-assurance framework. For each AE scenario, the survey participants were instructed to answer questions about the proposed and existing SIR classifications. SIR members were invited via online survey links, and 68 members participated among 140 surveyed. Answers on new and existing classifications were evaluated and compared statistically. Overall comparison between the two surveys was performed by generalized linear modeling. RESULTS: The proposed AE classification received superior evaluations in terms of consistency of reporting (P < .05) and potential for incorporation into existing quality-assurance framework (P < .05). Respondents gave a higher overall rating to the educational and research value of the new compared with the existing classification (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study proposed an AE classification system that outperformed the existing SIR classification in the studied domains.

Endovascular Management of Recurrent Spontaneous Hemarthrosis After Arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Recurrent spontaneous hemarthrosis is an infrequent but debilitating late complication of joint replacement, affecting up to 1.6% of patients with arthroplasty of the affected joint. Repeated episodes of bleeding result in an inflammatory cascade that further propagates bleeding events. Open and arthroscopic synovectomy are often performed when conservative treatments fail. Transarterial embolization is increasingly utilized as a less invasive option; however, its role is not widely established. We performed a systematic literature review to report the safety and efficacy of transarterial embolization in treating recurrent hemarthrosis in the setting of prior arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A structured search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and SCOPUS databases of patients undergoing embolization for recurrent hemarthrosis after arthroplasty. Patients immediately post-operative, those embolized at first bleeding episode, and those with hemophilia were excluded. Demographic data, clinical information, angiographic findings, treatment, and outcomes were tabulated. RESULTS: The search identified 119 titles of which 24 were deemed relevant, comprising 91 patients undergoing 99 embolization procedures. Mean time from prosthesis implantation was 32.2 months. Technical success was 99%. Mean follow-up time was 24.9 months. There were 10 recurrences (10%). Two cases were complicated by joint infection requiring arthroplasty revision. CONCLUSIONS: Transarterial embolization for recurrent spontaneous hemarthrosis may be safe and effective in patients having undergone arthroplasty of the affected joint.

Management of Uterine Fibroids: A Focus on Uterine-sparing Interventional Techniques.

Uterine fibroids occur in approximately 50% of women over the age of 40 years, and an estimated 50% of those are symptomatic. Menorrhagia is the most common symptom and the primary indication for treatment, although bulk symptoms often occur and can be treated. Pharmacotherapy is typically inadequate unless it can be expected to successfully bridge to menopause or allow for a less-invasive intervention. However, hormonal therapies have risks. Hysterectomy is still the most commonly performed procedure for symptomatic fibroids and has the lowest rate of reintervention (compared with myomectomy or uterine artery embolization [UAE]), but rates of more serious complications are higher and patient satisfaction and ability to return to normal activities may also be less favorable. Myomectomy is not necessarily less morbid than hysterectomy and may have a greater failure rate than UAE. Techniques and devices vary with little standardization, and operator experience is crucial to success. The largest studies of UAE show very low rates of serious complications and rapid recovery. UAE significantly improves symptoms related to uterine fibroids in 85%-90% of patients. Herein, this article will discuss the nature of fibroids and their diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, surgical treatment, and nonsurgical interventional treatment, including UAE and magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound. (©) RSNA, 2016.

Checklists for Image-Guided Interventions.

OBJECTIVE: Checklists are tools commonly used to help confirm that certain tasks of a process are completed. Within the health care industry, medical checklists are recognized as a means to improve patient safety. CONCLUSION: Recent application of checklists to image-guided interventions has shown positive outcomes; however, there are limited published studies. We review the literature regarding checklist use as a safety measure and focus on implementation of checklists for image-guided interventions.

The MILLER banding procedure as a treatment alternative for dialysis access steal syndrome: a single institutional experience.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a single institutional experience with minimally invasive limited ligation endoluminal-assisted revision (MILLER) for treatment of dialysis access steal syndrome (DASS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients were retrospectively identified that underwent 30 MILLER band procedures for DASS at our institution from March 2010 to December 2014. Technical success was defined by successful creation of MILLER band with preservation of flow for hemodialysis. Clinical success was defined as complete resolution of signs and symptoms with preservation of dialysis access in a 1-month postprocedural period. Primary MILLER band patency, postintervention-assisted primary access patency, and postprocedure secondary access patency are reported. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in all patients. Clinical success was achieved in 75% of patients after one banding procedure and in 95% of patients after two banding procedures. One patient experienced access thrombosis following the initial banding procedure which was subsequently treated and did not lead to loss of access. MILLER band patency was 83% at 1 month and 77% at 6 months. Postintervention-assisted primary patency was 95%, 93%, and 92% at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year, respectively. Postintervention secondary patency was 86%, 68%, and 59% at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MILLER banding offers a less-invasive alternative to surgical therapy that appears to be safe and permits preservation of dialysis access.

An endovascular simulation exercise among radiology residents: comparison of simulation performance with and without practice.

PURPOSE: The purpose was to compare resident endovascular simulator performance with and without prior simulation. METHODS: Radiology residents were guided through a practice simulation and lectured on endovascular therapy, then randomized to simulate femoral arterial intervention with or without prior iliac simulation. Simulator measurements, performance grading and resident surveys were recorded. RESULTS: Prior simulation of iliac intervention significantly improved resident performance. In particular, it resulted in less catheter placement without a wire (P=.01), shorter time to proper catheter positioning (P=.045) and use of oblique digital subtraction angiography (P=.035). Survey respondents valued the experience. CONCLUSION: Endovascular simulator training improves simulation skills. Improvement of real-world performance and generalizability remain to be shown.

Ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (onyx) embolization for acute hemorrhage: a systematic review of peripheral applications.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the endovascular use of ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH) copolymer (Onyx; ev3 Endovascular, Inc, Plymouth, Minnesota) for the treatment of acute peripheral nonneurologic hemorrhage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched for articles published in English from 1946 to August 2014 describing patients treated for hemorrhage with EVOH copolymer outside of its usual neurovascular applications. Additional cases were collected from the bibliographies of relevant articles. Full-text articles were obtained. Demographic data, clinical presentation, underlying etiology, culprit vessel, endovascular treatment, outcomes, and follow-up times were obtained. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 19 relevant articles. Cases of 131 patients (87 men, 44 women; mean age, 61 y ± 19.2) describing the treatment of 151 lesions were reviewed. The most common categories of arterial lesions were gastrointestinal (n = 53) and bronchial (n = 40) in origin. In 14 cases, EVOH copolymer was employed after failure or rebleeding following the use of a different embolic agent. Average follow-up time was 12.0 months. EVOH copolymer was the sole embolic agent used in 105 patients. Rebleeding after treatment with EVOH copolymer occurred in 10 patients. There were 2 technical failures. One patient died of multiorgan failure in the setting of persistent hemoptysis. Complications included 2 nerve injuries and 2 minor strokes. CONCLUSIONS: Embolization of acute hemorrhage in the peripheral vasculature was safe and effective with EVOH copolymer.

The use of ACR Appropriateness Criteria: a survey of radiology residents and program directors.

PURPOSE: Assess the utilization of American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria (ACR-AC) among radiology residency program directors (PDs) and residents. METHODS: Radiology PD and resident survey. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent (46/62) of PDs promote ACR-AC in education (P<.05), and 84% (317/376) of residents have read at least a few (P<.05). Seventy-four percent (74/100) of first-year residents compared to 56.8% (157/276) of second- to fourth-year residents report at least occasional faculty reference of ACR-AC (P<.05). ACR-AC are well regarded (P<.05), but 40% believe that they are perplexing. CONCLUSION: There is widespread resident awareness of ACR-AC and integration into resident training. However, faculty are only beginning to teach with them, and radiologists are not citing them with clinicians.

State of structured reporting in radiology, a survey.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To survey North American radiologists on current practices in structured reporting and language. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An e-mail invitation was sent to the Association of University Radiologists membership (comprising 910 members) to participate in an online survey that addressed development, use, and experience of structured reporting, language, and imaging classification or reporting systems and personal dictation styles. RESULTS: Of the 910 members e-mailed, 265 (29.1%) responded, 90.6% of whom were from academic teaching hospitals. There were no significant differences in responses based on group size or region of practice. Of all the respondents, 51.3% come from groups that developed structured reporting for at least half of their reports and only 10.9% for none. A significantly fewer 13% of respondents used rigid unmodifiable structures or checklists rather than adaptable outlines; 59.5% respondents report being satisfied or very satisfied with their structured reports, whereas a significantly fewer 13% report being dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. Structured reports were reportedly significantly more likely to be required, appreciated, and to decrease errors in departments using many structured reports compared to groups with less widespread use. CONCLUSIONS: Most academic radiology departments are using or experimenting with structured reports. Although radiologist satisfaction with standardization is significant, there are strong opinions about their limitations and value. Our survey suggests that North American radiologists are invested in exploring structured reporting and will hopefully inform future study on how we define a standard report and how much we can centralize this process.

Survey of current status and physician opinion regarding ancillary staffing for the IR suite.

PURPOSE: To survey the status quo of ancillary staffing in predominantly hospital-based interventional radiology (IR) suites and to assess interventional radiologist attitudes toward current IR procedure room staffing availability and appropriateness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Invitations to an online survey composed of 26 questions focused on levels of IR suite ancillary staffing as well as operators' opinions of current IR procedure room staffing were sent via email to 2,284 active Society of Interventional Radiology members. RESULTS: There were 777 survey responses. Nurse staffing count per IR room was at least one in 90% (n = 699) during regular hours and 93.6% (n = 730) during off-hours, respectively. A second technologist was frequently used during regular hours and, to a lesser extent, during on-call hours (n = 341 [43.9%] and n = 122 [15.7%]), respectively. Ten and 15% of IR respondents believe staffing support is inadequate for most interventional procedures requiring moderate sedation during normal business hours and off-hours/weekends, respectively, and 69% and 56% of IR respondents believe anesthesia support is inadequate during normal business hours and during off-hours, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The number of technologists used per IR suite varies across practices and frequently exceeds that of earlier American College of Radiology recommendations, whereas use of IR suite nurse staffing is consistent with approximately one per suite and constant. However, there is dissatisfaction among surveyed interventional radiologists with availability and appropriateness of staffing of the IR procedure room, particularly during on-call hours and weekends, as well as with anesthesia support for emergent cases. No evidence-based guidelines for staffing the IR suite currently exist. This underscores the need for further investigation with the ultimate goal of creating such guidelines.

Introducing radiology report checklists among residents: adherence rates when suggesting versus requiring their use and early experience in improving accuracy.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively compare resident adherence to checklist-style structured reporting for maxillofacial computed tomography (CT) from the emergency department (when required vs. suggested between two programs). To compare radiology resident reporting accuracy before and after introduction of the structured report and assess its ability to decrease the rate of undetected pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We introduced a reporting checklist for maxillofacial CT into our dictation software without specific training, requiring it at one program and suggesting it at another. We quantified usage among residents and compared reporting accuracy, before and after counting and categorizing faculty addenda. RESULTS: There was no significant change in resident accuracy in the first few months, with residents acting as their own controls (directly comparing performance with and without the checklist). Adherence to the checklist at program A (where it originated and was required) was 85% of reports compared to 9% of reports at program B (where it was suggested). When using program B as a secondary control, there was no significant difference in resident accuracy with or without using the checklist (comparing different residents using the checklist to those not using the checklist). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that there is no automatic value of checklists for improving radiology resident reporting accuracy. They also suggest the importance of focused training, checklist flexibility, and a period of adjustment to a new reporting style. Mandatory checklists were readily adopted by residents but not when simply suggested.

Reduction of operator radiation dose by an extended lower body shield.

PURPOSE: To quantify the reduction in operator exposure to scatter radiation by using an extension component in addition to a commonly used lower body radiation shield attached to an interventional radiology procedure table. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anthropomorphic pelvis phantom was exposed to fluoroscopy at varying C-arm angles to simulate a standard interventional procedure. A MAVIG UT60 lower body shield (MAVIG, Munich, Germany) (48 cm × 78 cm, 0.5 mm lead equivalent), with an attachable extension component (48 cm × 36 cm), was suspended from the edge of the table adjacent to the pelvic phantom. Using a handheld Geiger counter, scatter radiation exposure rates were measured at the level of an operator's eye, chest, waist, and knee, with various C-arm angles both with and without the attachable extension component. Mean exposure rates for each experimental setup were calculated and compared. RESULTS: Overall, scatter radiation exposures were lower with the addition of the extension component, with the largest reductions (> 80%) measured at the operator's waist and knee levels, for all C-arm angles. The highest reduction in scatter radiation exposure was measured at knee level, at 0 degrees left posterior oblique projection, where the use of the lower body shield extension component reduced the exposure rate from 4.80 mR/h to 0.44 mR/h (90.8% reduction, P < .001). Reductions in scatter radiation were less at eye and chest levels. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the additional extension component to the lower body radiation shield can result in large (> 80%) reductions in operator scatter radiation exposure, particularly to the lower body.

Fibular flap reconstruction of the cervical spine for repair of osteoradionecrosis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although cervical spine reconstruction with osteocutaneous fibular flap microvascular grafting has been described, simultaneous reconstruction of the cervical vertebral column and laryngectomy have not been described. PURPOSE: To present a unique case of combined cervical spine and laryngectomy reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Case report. METHODS: We modified a previously reported procedure reconstituting the cervical spine and pharynx with a single fibular flap in a case of posterior pharyngeal ulceration and osteomyelitis/osteoradionecrosis without spinal deformity. RESULTS: We present a case of simultaneous cervical stabilization and pharynx reconstruction with a fibular graft in a life-saving treatment of osteoradionecrosis complicated by acute cervical kyphosis and spinal cord compression in a 55-year-old patient with extensive head and neck cancer history and recent recurrence of hypopharyngeal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Rigid anterior plate fixation and subsequent posterior fixation were required after corpectomy and total laryngectomy in our patient with extensive surgical scarring and radiation history because of severe spinal deformity secondary to osteoradionecrosis. We achieved successful preservation of neurologic function and resolution of pain.

Radiation protection in interventional radiology: survey results of attitudes and use.

PURPOSE: To assess attitudes of interventional radiologists toward personal radiation protection and the use of radiation protection devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Invitations to an anonymous online survey that comprised eight questions focused on operator attitudes toward radiation protection devices were sent via e-mail to the active membership of the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR): a total of 3,158 e-mail invitations. A single reminder e-mail was sent. RESULTS: There were 504 survey responders (16% response rate). Reported radiation safety device use included lead apron (99%), thyroid shield (94%), leaded eyeglasses (54%), ceiling-suspended leaded shield (44%), rolling leaded shields (12%), ceiling-suspended/rolling lead-equivalent apron (4%), radiation-attenuating sterile surgical gloves (1%), and sterile lead-equivalent patient-mounted drape (4%). Reasons commonly cited for not using certain devices were comfort (eyewear), ease of use (mounted shields), and lack of availability (rolling/hanging shields and patient-mounted shields). CONCLUSIONS: Interventionalists have an array of tools from which to choose for personal radiation protection; however, for a variety of reasons related to lack of availability or choice, these tools are not universally employed. Further study may be of value to clarify why comfort was cited most often as the primary barrier to the use of protective eyewear and difficulty of use was cited as the primary barrier to use of mounted shields (despite reporting that concern for radiation-induced injury to the eye is paramount). It may also be of interest to further study why certain devices with demonstrable protection effects are not readily available, such as rolling/hanging and patient-mounted shields.