ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) is the primary cause of hospitalization in patients with sickle cell disease. Treatment mainly consists of intravenous morphine or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which have many dose-related side effects. The question arises as to whether vascular electrical stimulation therapy (VEST) could be effective or not on VOCs. OBJECTIVE: To measure the effectiveness and safety of VEST in reducing the median time spent in severe VOC. METHODS: We conducted a phase II, single blinded, randomized, controlled, triple-arm, comparative trial. We included thirty (30) adult patients with severe vaso-occlusive crisis. The study arms were divided as follows: our control group (group 0) constituted of 10 patients followed with conventional therapy (Analgesics + Hydration + NSAIDs), while 20 patients were divided equally into two interventional arms-10 patients followed with VEST + Analgesics + Hydration (group 1) and the other 10 patients followed with VEST + Analgesics + Hydration + NSAIDs (group 2). The primary efficacy endpoint was median time to severe crisis elimination. The secondary end points were median time to end-of-crisis, median tramadol consumption, progress of the haemoglobin level over 3 days, side effects, and treatment failure. RESULTS: The age ranged from 14 to 37 years, including 23 women. We noted a beneficial influence of the VEST on the median time to severe crisis (VAS greater than 2) elimination; 17 hours (group 1) against 3.5 hours (group 2) p=0.0166 and 4 hours (group 3) with p value = 0.0448. Similar significant results were obtained on the diminution of total duration of the crisis (VAS over 0) and median tramadol consumption in patients in the interventional arms. CONCLUSION: These statistically significant results in the interventional arms suggest that VEST could be an alternative treatment of VOC in sickle cell patients.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemia is based on the presence of translocation t(9,22). Additional cytogenetic abnormalities may exist at diagnosis and have prognostic value. The authors evaluated the relationship between these additional chromosomal abnormalities, clinical presentation, and therapeutic response. METHOD: In a retrospective and comparative study from 2005 to 2015, at Yopougon university hospital, 51 cases of myeloid leukemia were selected, including 22 cases with additional chromosomal abnormalities. RESULTS: Thirteen types of additional Ph1 abnormalities were detected in one group, with a median age of 39years (13-73); a sex ratio of 1.4 and a low social class (49%). The median consultation time is 13months (2-29). Hepatomegaly (54%, P=0.05); fever (81.8%, P=0.0017); bone pain (63.6%, P=0.0001); lymphadenopathies (27.3% P=0.014); poor general condition [WHO>1 (77.3%, P=0.001)], high Sokal index (63.6%, P=0.0019), eosinophilia>5% (72.7, P=0.02) and circulating blastosis were found more frequent in the group with additional abnormalities treated with imatinib mesylate. We obtained 13.6% hematologic remission and 22.7% cytogenetic remission (P=0.02). The average survival was relatively short (20months vs. 76.4months, Log-rank<0.0001). We deplored a high death rate (59.1%). CONCLUSION: The presence of an additional anomaly constitutes a pejorative element refractory to imatinib.
