Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Surgeon ; 20(5): e288-e295, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35144899

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection, where appropriate, remains one of the best treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), however outcomes can be compromised by the development of liver failure. We reviewed our experience of liver resection for HCC patients to identify factors that may predict the development of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) and survival. METHODS: A single centre retrospective cohort study. Data was collected between 1999 and 2017 from all patients undergoing HCC resection in a tertiary university hospital from electronic medical records. PHLF was defined as per the International Study Group for Liver Surgery criteria. Variables with p < 0.15 on univariate analysis were included in a multivariate binary logistic regression model. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to determine correlations with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and variables with p < 0.15 on univariate analysis selected for a step-down Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: Overall, 120 patients underwent liver resection within the study period, of which 22 (18%) developed PHLF. Patients with normal INR ≤1.20 at day 2 did not develop PHLF whereas patients with INR >1.60 were at significant risk. Resection of multiple tumours (odds ratio 21.63, p = 0.002) and deranged postoperative day 2 INR>1.6 (odds ratio 21.05, p < 0.0001) were identified as independent prognostic markers of PHLF. CONCLUSION: The use of INR measurement at day 2 predicts PHLF and may enable us to objectively identify and stratify patients who may be eligible for enhanced recovery programs from those who will merit close monitoring in high dependency areas.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Liver Failure , Liver Neoplasms , Hepatectomy/adverse effects , Humans , International Normalized Ratio , Liver Failure/etiology , Liver Failure/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/surgery , Retrospective Studies
2.
Br J Surg ; 109(2): 152-154, 2022 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34435203

ABSTRACT

During a kidney transplant, a plastic tube (stent) is placed in the ureter, connecting the new kidney to the bladder, in order to keep the new join open during the initial phase of transplantation. The stent is then removed after a few weeks via a camera procedure (cystoscopy), as it is no longer needed. The present study compared performing this in the operating theatre or in clinic for transplanted patients using a new single-use type of camera with an integrated grasper system. The results have shown that it is safe and cost-effective to do this in clinic, despite patients being susceptible to infection after transplantation.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/methods , Cystoscopy/methods , Device Removal/methods , Kidney Transplantation , Stents , Ureter , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cystoscopy/adverse effects , Cystoscopy/economics , Device Removal/adverse effects , Device Removal/economics , Feasibility Studies , Female , Hospital Costs , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Operating Rooms/economics , Postoperative Care/adverse effects , Postoperative Care/economics , Postoperative Care/methods , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...