Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neurosci Lett ; 753: 135866, 2021 05 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33812932

ABSTRACT

The voluntary movement demands integration between cognitive and motor functions. During the initial stages of motor learning until mastery of a new motor task, and during a demanding task that is not automatic, cognitive and motor functions can be perceived as independent from each other. Areas used for actually performing motor tasks are essentially the same used by Motor Imagery (MI). The main objective of this study was to investigate inhibition effects on cognitive functions of motor skills induced by low-frequency (1 Hz) Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) at the sensory-motor integration site (Cz). In particular, the goal was to examine absolute alpha and beta power changes on frontal regions during Execution, Action observation, and Motor Imagery of finger movement tasks. Eleven healthy, right-handed volunteers of both sexes (5 males, 6 females; mean age 28 ± 5 years), with no history of psychiatric or neurological disorders, participated in the experiment. The execution task consisted of the subject flexing and extending the index finger. The action observation task involved watching a video of the same movement. The motor imagery task was imagining the flexion and extension of the index finger movement. After performing the tasks randomly, subjects were submitted to 15 min of low-frequency rTMS and performed the tasks again. All tasks were executed simultaneously with EEG signals recording. Our results demonstrated a significant interaction between rTMS and the three tasks in almost all analyzed regions showing that rTMS can affect the frontal region regarding Execution, Action observation, and Motor Imagery tasks.


Subject(s)
Cognition/physiology , Frontal Lobe/physiology , Motor Skills/physiology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Adult , Alpha Rhythm/physiology , Beta Rhythm/physiology , Female , Humans , Young Adult
2.
Neurosci Lett ; 687: 77-81, 2018 11 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30253222

ABSTRACT

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) studies are used to test motor imagery hypothesis. Motor Imagery (MI) represents conscious access to contents of movement intention, generally executed unconsciously during motor preparation. The main objective of this study was to investigate electrophysiological changes, which occurred before and after low-frequency rTMS application when we compared three different tasks: execution, action observation and motor imagery of finger movement. We hypothesize that absolute theta power over frontal regions would change between sensorimotor integration tasks and after 1 Hz of rTMS application. Eleven healthy, right-handed volunteers of both sexes (5 males, 6 females; mean age 28 ± 5 years), with no history of psychiatric or neurological disorders, participated in the experiment. After performing the tasks randomly, subjects were submitted to 15 min of low-frequency rTMS applied on Superior Parietal Cortex (SPC) and performed the tasks again. All tasks were executed simultaneously with Eletroencephalography (EEG) signals recording. Our results clarified the specificity of each sub-region during MI activity. Frontopolar cortex presented involvement with motor process and showed main effect for task and moment. Inferior frontal gyrus presented involvement with long-term memory retrieval and showed interaction between task and moment in the left hemisphere while the right hemisphere showed a main effect for task and moment. The lack of the main effect for conditions on the anterior frontal cortex collaborates with the hypothesis that in this region an integrated circuit of performance monitoring exists.


Subject(s)
Cognition/physiology , Movement/physiology , Parietal Lobe/physiology , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Theta Rhythm/physiology , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Adult , Electroencephalography/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Photic Stimulation/methods , Young Adult
3.
CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets ; 13(6): 961-71, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24923335

ABSTRACT

This article considered already existing studies about Deep Brain Stimulation in Mood and Anxiety Disorders. In particular, articles regarding Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Major Depression were mostly analyzed, due to the lack of researches about other types of Mood and Anxiety Disorders. We have concentrated on the target areas where Deep Brain Stimulation was most commonly applied, and on the effects this measure had on treatment-refractory patients. The obtained results showed that the stimulation of the: nucleus accumbens, subgenual cingulate cortex and ventral capsule/ventral striatum, has a positive influence on the development of the disorders investigated, sometimes showing the complete remission of the symptoms. Although Deep Brain Stimulation was overall found to be a promising and safe treatment for Mood and Anxiety Disorders, there are not enough studies proving its efficacy in wide samples and in the presence of more complex variables.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Mood Disorders/therapy , Brain/physiology , Deep Brain Stimulation/trends , Humans
4.
J Neurol Sci ; 338(1-2): 12-22, 2014 Mar 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24398346

ABSTRACT

For many decades the parietal cortex (PC) has been considered the key area in tasks which involve the integration of different stimuli. PC is fundamental to determine spatial sense, information navigation and integration, and is involved in several aspects of the complex motor repertoire and in neurological and psychiatric disorders. In this review, we focus on seven different aspects of PC: (i) neuroanatomy of the parietal cortex; (ii) sensory motor integration processes; iii) hand movement control: reaching, grasping, and pointing; (iv) saccadic eye movements; (v) movement observation; (vi) neurological aspects: ataxia, autism and Parkinson's disease; and (vii) psychiatric aspects: schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and depression. Among these, we related the perspectives which involve the functions of the parietal cortex and mirror neurons and that seem to play a fundamental role in action prediction, planning, observation and execution. Furthermore, we focused on the relationship between posterior parietal cortex (PPC) and hand-guided movements. For this review, we conducted an academic paper search which fulfilled the objective of the study. We conclude that the PC has great participation in different motor functions and neurological/psychiatric disorders.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/pathology , Nervous System Diseases/pathology , Parietal Lobe/pathology , Databases, Bibliographic/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Mental Disorders/complications , Nervous System Diseases/complications , Parietal Lobe/physiology
5.
Int Arch Med ; 5: 9, 2012 Feb 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22364485

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Catching an object is a complex movement that involves not only programming but also effective motor coordination. Such behavior is related to the activation and recruitment of cortical regions that participates in the sensorimotor integration process. This study aimed to elucidate the cortical mechanisms involved in anticipatory actions when performing a task of catching an object in free fall. METHODS: Quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) was recorded using a 20-channel EEG system in 20 healthy right-handed participants performed the catching ball task. We used the EEG coherence analysis to investigate subdivisions of alpha (8-12 Hz) and beta (12-30 Hz) bands, which are related to cognitive processing and sensory-motor integration. RESULTS: Notwithstanding, we found the main effects for the factor block; for alpha-1, coherence decreased from the first to sixth block, and the opposite effect occurred for alpha-2 and beta-2, with coherence increasing along the blocks. CONCLUSION: It was concluded that to perform successfully our task, which involved anticipatory processes (i.e. feedback mechanisms), subjects exhibited a great involvement of sensory-motor and associative areas, possibly due to organization of information to process visuospatial parameters and further catch the falling object.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...