Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Conscientiae Saúde (Online) ; 21: e23145, 20.05.2022.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1552144

ABSTRACT

Introdução: Para melhor compreensão da mensuração da funcionalidade após Acidente Vascular Cerebral (AVC) é necessário entender a relação entre desempenho e a capacidade. Objetivo: contrastar a autopercepção do desempenho com a capacidade aferida após AVC. Métodos: Estudo transversal, no qual avaliou-se a autopercepção do desempenho por meio da Medida de Independência Funcional (MIF) e a capacidade por meio da Escala de Equilíbrio de Berg (BERG), Timed Up and Go test (TUG) e do teste de caminhada de 10 metros (TC10m). Resultados: Avaliou-se 51 indivíduos, sendo 18 dependentes e 33 independentes. Houve diferença entre os grupos na mobilidade (TUG) (p=0,02) e no equilíbrio (BERG) (p<0,001). Não houve diferença na velocidade marcha. Houve correlação significante entre a autopercepção do desempenho e a mobilidade (rs=-0,32; p=0,02) e equilíbrio (rs=0,47, p=0,001). Não houve correlação entre o TC10m com o desempenho. Conclusão: A autopercepção do desempenho se correlaciona com medidas objetivas de mobilidade e equilíbrio, contudo, não tem relação com a velocidade da marcha.


Introduction: In order to comprehend the assessment of functioning following a stroke, it is crucial to understand the interrelationship between performance and capacity. Objective: To contrast the self-perception of performance with the objectively measured capacity after a stroke. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the self-perception of performance using the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and capacity using the Berg Balance Scale (BERG), Timed Up and Go test (TUG), and 10-meter walk test (10MWT). A total of 51 individuals were assessed, with 18 being dependent and 33 being independent. Results: Significant differences were found between the groups in terms of mobility (TUG) (p=0.02) and balance (BERG) (p<0.001), but no difference was found in gait speed. A significant correlation was found between self-perceived performance and mobility (rs=-0.32; p=0.02) and balance (rs=0.47, p=0.001). However, there was no correlation between 10MWT and performance. Conclusion: Self-perception of performance is positively correlated with objective measures of mobility and balance but not associated with gait speed after stroke.

2.
Disabil Rehabil ; 42(2): 156-162, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30451028

ABSTRACT

Objective: Perform a systematic review to identify the categories of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health linked to the concepts measured by functional assessment tools validated for Brazilian Portuguese: Timed Up and Go test, Functional Independence Measure, Barthel Index, and Rivermead Mobility Index and Modified Rankin Scale.Methods: The Medline, Embase and CINAHL databases were consulted using a standardized search strategy. The studies were summarized using a pre-established set of specific criteria for the adequate linkage between the concepts identified in the assessment measures and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health categories. Two independent reviewers performed the selection of the studies, data extraction and evaluation of the results.Results: The search of the databanks led to the retrieval of 99 studies. However, only six articles were included in the present review. The linkage results of the studies included in the review were divergent, likely due to the taxonomic complexity of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, the difficulty in clearly relating the concepts of the assessment measures to the classifications and the fact that not all linkage rules were followed. "Activities and participation" was the most evaluated component, with mobility the most frequently covered category in the measures, followed by self-care. Among the measures analyzed, the Functional Independence Measure addresses a greater number of categories and therefore has the most concepts related to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, followed by the Barthel Index, Modified Rankin Scale, Rivermead Mobility Index and Timed Up and Go test. The Modified Rankin Scale was the assessment tool that most evaluated categories related to environmental factors.Conclusion: The Functional Independence Measure has more concepts related to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, since it addresses a greater number of categories. These findings can help guide health professionals in the selection of assessment tools for the evaluation of post-stroke functioning, making viable the use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health categories in clinical practice and public health services.Implications for rehabilitationThis study standardized identification of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health categories in the main outcome measures used to assess post-stroke functional capacity.Functional Independence Measure has more concepts related to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health compared to other functional assessment instruments.Findings can enable physiotherapists and researchers choose the most appropriate measure that best corresponds to their field of interest.These results facilitate the implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in clinical practice.Use of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health categories can standardize information on functional health.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health , Stroke , Activities of Daily Living , Brazil , Humans , Postural Balance , Survivors , Time and Motion Studies
3.
Fisioter. Pesqui. (Online) ; 25(4): 404-409, out.-dez. 2018. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-975360

ABSTRACT

RESUMO O acidente vascular encefálico pode deixar sequelas neurológicas, motoras e sensitivas. Para avaliar e acompanhar o prognóstico do paciente, são usados diversos instrumentos funcionais de medida, como a escala de Fugl-Meyer, que apesar de amplamente utilizada para estimar a recuperação sensório-motora, é uma avaliação longa e que exige treinamento. Diante disso, o objetivo deste estudo é analisar se a força de preensão manual, o timed up and go e a medida de independência funcional podem predizer os resultados da escala Fugl-Meyer, com o intuito de otimizar o tempo de avaliação da recuperação sensório-motora, tanto para o acompanhamento da resposta ao tratamento quanto para pesquisas científicas. Para tanto, avaliou-se a força de preensão manual de 35 hemiparéticos crônicos, e em seguida foram aplicadas à escala Fugl-Meyer, que avalia a recuperação motora, a medida de independência funcional nas atividades motoras e o timed up and go, indicativo de mobilidade funcional. Para análise estatística utilizou-se a regressão linear múltipla (r2). A força de preensão manual mostrou-se preditora da recuperação motora (r2=0,46; p=0,001), enquanto a mobilidade (r2=0,255; p=0,007) e a independência funcional (r2=0,054; p=0,2) não foram capazes de predizer os resultados da escala Fugl-Meyer. Após análise, pôde-se inferir que a força de preensão manual é preditora moderada da recuperação motora pós-acidente vascular encefálico, enquanto mobilidade e a independência funcional, não.


RESUMEN El accidente cerebrovascular puede ocasionar secuelas neurológicas, motores y sensoriales. Para evaluar y monitorear el pronóstico del paciente, se utilizan diversos instrumentos funcionales, como la escala de Fugl-Meyer, que aunque es ampliamente utilizada para estimar la recuperación sensoriomotor, presenta una evaluación larga y que requiere entrenamiento. Teniendo en cuenta lo anterior, este estudio pretende analizar si la fuerza de prensión manual, el timed up and go y la medición de independencia funcional pueden predecir los resultados de la escala de Fugl-Meyer para que se mejore el tiempo de evaluación de la recuperación sensorial y motora, tanto para monitorear la respuesta al tratamiento como para estudios científicos. Por tanto, se evaluó la fuerza de prensión manual de 35 hemiparéticos crónicos, y luego se aplicaron a la escala de Fugl-Meyer, que evalúa la recuperación motora, las medidas de la independencia funcional en las actividades motoras y el timed up and go, indicativo de movilidad funcional. Para el análisis estadístico se utilizó la regresión lineal múltiple (r2). La fuerza de prensión manual ha demostrado ser predictiva de la recuperación motora (r2=0,46; p=0,001), mientras que la movilidad (r2=0,255; p=0,007) y la independencia funcional (r2=0,054; p=0,2) no fueron capaces de predecir los resultados de la escala de Fugl-Meyer. Del análisis se puede inferir que la fuerza de prensión manual es una predictora moderada en la recuperación motora posaccidente cerebrovascular, mientras que no lo son la movilidad y la independencia funcional.


ABSTRACT Cerebrovascular accidents can leave neurological, motor and sensory sequelae. To assess and monitor the patient's prognosis, several functional measuring instruments are used, such as the Fugl-Meyer scale, which, although widely used to estimate the sensorimotor recovery, is a long evaluation that requires training. Therefore, the objective of this study is to analyze if the handgrip strength (HGS), the Timed up and Go test (TUG) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) can predict the results of the Fugl-Meyer scale, in order to optimize time during sensorimotor recovery assessment, both to monitor treatment responses and for scientific research. Thus, the HGS of 35 chronic hemiparetic patients was evaluated and then applied to Fugl-Meyer Scale, which evaluates motor recovery, the FIM, which evaluates motor activities and the TUG, which is an indicative of functional mobility. Statistical analysis was performed using multiple regression (r2). The HGS was predictive of motor recovery (r2=0.46; p=0.001), while mobility (r2=0.255; p=0.007) and functional independence (r2=0.054; p=0.2) were not capable of predicting the results of the Fugl-Meyer scale. After analysis, it was concluded that HGS is a moderate predictor of motor recovery after cerebrovascular accident, while mobility and functional independence are not.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...