Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Molecules ; 16(11): 9421-38, 2011 Nov 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22075572

ABSTRACT

A new approach for the synthesis of indatraline was developed using as the key step an iodine(III)-mediated ring contraction of a 1,2-dihydronaphthalene derivative. Behavioral tests were conducted to evaluate the effect of indatraline and of its precursor indanamide on the motor activity of Wistar rats. Specific indexes for ambulation, raising and stereotypy were computed one, two and three hours after i.p. drug administration. Indatraline effects on motor activity lasted for at least three hours. On the other hand, no significant differences in motor activity were observed using indanamide. The results suggest that indatraline has a long lasting effect on motor activity and add evidence in favor of the potential use of that compound as a substitute in cocaine addiction.


Subject(s)
Behavior, Animal/drug effects , Indans/chemical synthesis , Indans/pharmacology , Methylamines/chemical synthesis , Methylamines/pharmacology , Motor Activity/drug effects , Animals , Cocaine-Related Disorders/drug therapy , Indans/chemistry , Indans/therapeutic use , Iodine/chemistry , Male , Methylamines/chemistry , Methylamines/therapeutic use , Molecular Structure , Naphthalenes/chemistry , Random Allocation , Rats , Rats, Wistar
2.
Neurosci Lett ; 404(1-2): 232-6, 2006 Aug 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16808997

ABSTRACT

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive powerful method to modulate brain activity. It can enhance motor learning and working memory in healthy subjects. To investigate the effects of anodal tDCS (1 mA, 20 min) of the dominant and non-dominant primary motor cortex (M1) on hand motor performance in healthy right-handed volunteers, healthy subjects underwent one session of both sham and active anodal stimulation of the non-dominant or dominant primary motor cortex. A blinded rater assessed motor function using the Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test. For the non-dominant hand, active tDCS was able to improve motor function significantly-there was a significant interaction between time and condition of stimulation (p = 0.003). Post hoc tests showed a significant enhancement of JTT performance after 1 mA anodal tDCS of M1 (mean improvement of 9.41%, p = 0.0004), but not after sham tDCS (mean improvement of 1.3%, p = 0.84). For the dominant hand, however, neither active nor sham tDCS resulted in a significant change in motor performance. Our findings show that anodal tDCS of the non-dominant primary motor cortex results in motor function enhancement and thus confirm and extend the notion that tDCS can change behavior. We speculate that the under-use of the non-dominant hand with its associated consequences in cortical plasticity might be one of the reasons to explain motor performance enhancement in the non-dominant hand only.


Subject(s)
Brain/physiology , Dominance, Cerebral , Hand/innervation , Motor Activity/physiology , Adult , Electric Stimulation , Female , Humans , Reference Values , Weight-Bearing
3.
Exp Brain Res ; 166(1): 23-30, 2005 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15999258

ABSTRACT

Previous studies have claimed that weak transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces persisting excitability changes in the human motor cortex that can be more pronounced than cortical modulation induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation, but there are no studies that have evaluated the effects of tDCS on working memory. Our aim was to determine whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, which enhances brain cortical excitability and activity, would modify performance in a sequential-letter working memory task when administered to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Fifteen subjects underwent a three-back working memory task based on letters. This task was performed during sham and anodal stimulation applied over the left DLPFC. Moreover seven of these subjects performed the same task, but with inverse polarity (cathodal stimulation of the left DLPFC) and anodal stimulation of the primary motor cortex (M1). Our results indicate that only anodal stimulation of the left prefrontal cortex, but not cathodal stimulation of left DLPFC or anodal stimulation of M1, increases the accuracy of the task performance when compared to sham stimulation of the same area. This accuracy enhancement during active stimulation cannot be accounted for by slowed responses, as response times were not changed by stimulation. Our results indicate that left prefrontal anodal stimulation leads to an enhancement of working memory performance. Furthermore, this effect depends on the stimulation polarity and is specific to the site of stimulation. This result may be helpful to develop future interventions aiming at clinical benefits.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Prefrontal Cortex/physiology , Adult , Electrodes/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Memory Disorders/therapy , Motor Cortex/physiology , Neuropsychological Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...