The impact of electrical stimulation protocols on neuronal cell survival and proliferation using cell-laden GelMA/graphene oxide hydrogels.

The development of electroactive cell-laden hydrogels (bioscaffolds) has gained interest in neural tissue engineering research due to their inherent electrical properties that can induce the regulation of cell behaviour. Hydrogels combined with electrically conducting materials can respond to external applied electric fields, where these stimuli can promote electro-responsive cell growth and proliferation. A successful neural interface for electrical stimulation should present the desired stable electrical properties, such as high conductivity, low impedance, increased charge storage capacity and similar mechanical properties related to a target neural tissue. We report how different electrical stimulation protocols can impact neuronal cells' survival and proliferation when using cell-laden GelMA/GO hydrogels. The rat pheochromocytoma cell line, PC12s encapsulated into hydrogels showed an increased proliferation behaviour with increasing current amplitudes applied. Furthermore, the presence of GO in GelMA hydrogels enhanced the metabolic activity and DNA content of PC12s compared with GelMA alone. Similarly, hydrogels provided survival of encapsulated cells at higher current amplitudes when compared to cells seeded onto ITO flat surfaces, which expressed significant cell death at a current amplitude of 2.50 mA. Our findings provide new rational choices for electroactive hydrogels and electrical stimulation with broad potential applications in neural tissue engineering research.

Antifouling Strategies for Electrochemical Biosensing: Mechanisms and Performance toward Point of Care Based Diagnostic Applications.

Although there exist numerous established laboratory-based technologies for sample diagnostics and analyte detection, many medical and forensic science applications require point of care based platforms for rapid on-the-spot sample analysis. Electrochemical biosensors provide a promising avenue for such applications due to the portability and functional simplicity of the technology. However, the ability to develop such platforms with the high sensitivity and selectivity required for analysis of low analyte concentrations in complex biological samples remains a paramount issue in the field of biosensing. Nonspecific adsorption, or fouling, at the electrode interface via the innumerable biomolecules present in these sample types (i.e., serum, urine, blood/plasma, and saliva) can drastically obstruct electrochemical performance, increasing background "noise" and diminishing both the electrochemical signal magnitude and specificity of the biosensor. Consequently, this review aims to discuss strategies and concepts used throughout the literature to prevent electrode surface fouling in biosensors and to communicate the nature of the antifouling mechanisms by which they operate. Evaluation of each antifouling strategy is focused primarily on the fabrication method, experimental technique, sample composition, and electrochemical performance of each technology highlighting the overall feasibility of the platform for point of care based diagnostic/detection applications.

Dual Signaling DNA Electrochemistry: An Approach To Understand DNA Interfaces.

Electrochemical DNA biosensors composed of a redox marker modified nucleic acid probe tethered to a solid electrode is a common experimental construct for detecting DNA and RNA targets, proteins, inorganic ions, and even small molecules. This class of biosensors generally relies on the binding-induced conformational changes in the distance of the redox marker relative to the electrode surface such that the charge transfer is altered. The conventional design is to attach the redox species to the distal end of a surface-bound nucleic acid strand. Here we show the impact of the position of the redox marker, whether on the distal or proximal end of the DNA monolayer, on the DNA interface electrochemistry. Somewhat unexpectedly, greater currents were obtained when the redox molecules were located on the distal end of the surface-bound DNA monolayer, notionally furthest away from the electrode, compared with currents when the redox species were located on the proximal end, close to the electrode. Our results suggest that a limitation in ion accessibility is the reason why smaller currents were obtained for the redox markers located at the bottom of the DNA monolayer. This understanding shows that to allow the quantification of the amount of redox labeled target DNA strand that hybridizes to probe DNA immobilized on the electrode surface, the redox species must be on the distal end of the surface-bound duplex.