Proposed cut-off for reactivity of anti-HMGCR and anti-SRP antibodies in patients statin-exposed and statin-unexposed.

The therapeutic approach with statins is widely used in the control of dyslipidemias. However, there is no laboratory evaluation to elect patients to make use of this class of therapeutic drugs.We analyzed the prevalence of anti-signal recognition particle (anti-SRP) and anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (anti-HMGCR) antibodies in a heterogeneous cohort of 85 patients in order to determine cutoff reference values for these antibodies.Serum samples from 85 patients were screened for the presence of anti-HMGCR and anti-SRP autoantibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The demographic, clinical, and morphological features were also correlated with anti-HMGCR and anti-SRP antibodies. The patients were divided in 2 groups: A, statin-exposed, and B, statin-unexposed.There was no significant association (P > .05) among anti-HMGCR and anti-SRP titers in relation to age, sex, statin exposure, and CK level. The concentrations of both antibodies were not correlated with symptoms, CK level, or statin exposure. Eleven (12.9%) patients had anti-HMGCR antibodies. We found a tendency (P = .051) toward greater anti-HMGCR positivity in women with no symptoms. Twelve (14.1%) patients had anti-SRP antibodies. There was no sex predominance, and only 1 patient had muscle complaints. Muscular symptoms were present in 31 (36.5%) patients, 4 (12.9%) were positive for anti-HMGCR antibodies, and 1 (3.2%) was positive for anti-SRP antibodies. A total of 54 (63.5%) patients had no muscle symptoms, 7 (13%) were anti-HMGCR positive, and 11 (20.4%) were anti-SRP positive. We found statistical significance for patients with anti-SRP antibodies when asymptomatic and symptomatic patients were compared (P = .029). In contrast, there was no statistically significant difference between symptoms and positivity for anti-HMG antibodies.One of the main aims of this study was to define a cutoff point in a heterogeneous population with different diagnoses. We also demonstrated that anti-HMGCR and anti-SRP antibodies are not 100% specific to immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy. We believe that these antibodies must be tested and interpreted within the specific context.

Genetic Mutations and Demographic, Clinical, and Morphological Aspects of Myofibrillar Myopathy in a French Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Protein aggregate myopathies (PAM) represent a group of familial or sporadic neuromuscular conditions with marked clinical and genetic heterogeneity that occur in children and adults. Familial PAM includes myofibrillar myopathies defined by the presence of desmin-positive protein aggregates and degenerative intermyofibrillar network changes. PAM is often caused by dysfunctional genes, such as DES, PLEC 1, CRYAB, FLNC, MYOT, ZASP, BAG3, FHL1, and DNAJB6. OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze genetic mutations and demographic, clinical, and morphological aspects of PAM in a French population. METHODS: Forty-eight PAM patients (29 men, 19 women) were divided into two groups, those with genetically (GIM) and nongenetically identified (NGIM) mutations associated with myofibrillar myopathy. RESULTS: Age of myopathy onset ranged from 13 to 68 years. GIM group mutations (81.25%) included DES (14), ZASP (8), FLNC (4), MYOT (4), BAG3 (1), CRYAB (2), and DNAJB6 (6). The MYOT subgroup displayed a significantly older onset age (p = 0.029). Autosomal dominant inheritance was found in 74.3% of GIM and 44.4% of NGIM subjects. Overall, 22.9% had Maghrebian heritage, 72.9% Caucasian, and 4.2% Asian. The most common clinical sign was distal muscle weakness (66%) followed by simultaneous distal and proximal weakness in 49%. Eleven patients had contractures, one had a rigid spine, and five had respiratory dysfunction. GIM subjects had greater cardiac involvement (51.7%) versus the NGIM group (33.3%). The average serum creatine kinase level was 393 U/L in GIM and 382 U/L in NGIM subjects. Morphological analysis showed significant differences among GIM subgroups, including the number of vacuoles and regenerated fibers (ZASP), group atrophy (ZASP), and rubbed out fibers (MYOT). Ultrastructural findings showed significant differences in intranuclear rods, Z-disc thickness, and intranuclear inclusions between gene mutation subgroups. Paracrystalline inclusions were present in three patients (DNAJB6). The most frequent mutation in was in DES, followed by ZASP. CONCLUSIONS: GIM and NGIM PAM subjects showed similar results, suggesting that any unknown genes, which cause this disease have characteristics similar to those already described. Considering the complexity of clinical, morphological, and genetic data related to PAM, particularly myofibrillar myopathies, physicians should be careful when diagnosing patients with sporadic PAM.