Evidence-informed guidelines in oral health: insights from a systematic survey.

BACKGROUND: Oral diseases are a major global public health problem, impacting the quality of life of those affected. While consensus exists on the importance of high-quality, evidence-informed guidelines to inform practice and public health decisions in medicine, appropriate methodologies and standards are not commonly adhered to among producers of oral health guidelines. This study aimed to systematically identify organizations that develop evidence-informed guidelines in oral health globally and survey the methodological process followed to formulate recommendations. METHODS: We searched numerous electronic databases, guideline repositories, and websites of guideline developers, scientific societies, and international organizations (January 2012-October 2023) to identify organizations that develop guidelines addressing any oral health topic and that explicitly declare the inclusion of research evidence in their development. Pairs of reviewers independently evaluated potentially eligible organizations according to predefined selection criteria and extracted data about the organization's characteristics, key features of their guidelines, and the process followed when formulating formal recommendations. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze and summarize data. RESULTS: We included 46 organizations that developed evidence-informed guidelines in oral health. The organizations were mainly professional associations and scientific societies (67%), followed by governmental organizations (28%). In total, organizations produced 55 different guideline document types, most of them containing recommendations for clinical practice (77%). Panels were primarily composed of healthcare professionals (87%), followed by research methodologists (40%), policymakers (24%), and patient partners (18%). Most (60%) of the guidelines reported their funding source, but only one out of three (33%) included a conflict of interest (COI) policy management. The methodology used in the 55 guideline document types varied across the organizations, but only 19 (35%) contained formal recommendations. Half (51%) of the guideline documents referred to a methodology handbook, 46% suggested a structured approach or system for rating the certainty of the evidence and the strength of recommendations, and 37% mentioned using a framework to move from evidence to decisions, with the GRADE-EtD being the most widely used (27%). CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore the need for alignment and standardization of both terminology and methodologies used in oral health guidelines with current international standards to formulate trustworthy recommendations.

Inyección local de toxina botulínica para la prevención de cicatrices hipertróficas y queloides: un protocolo para una revisión panorámica

Introducción: Las cicatrices hipertróficas (CH) y queloides (QU) corresponden al resultado de una cicatrización patológica en la piel, que afectan la calidad de vida de quienes las presentan. Su tratamiento considera diversas intervenciones, muchas de las cuales son de alto costo y/o poco predecibles. Entre ellas, la toxina botulínica (TB) podría tener un efecto a nivel preventivo, aunque los resúmenes de evidencia presentan resultados disímiles. Por esto, proponemos sintetizar la evidencia proveniente de revisiones sistemáticas (RS) y metaanálisis (MA) de ensayos clínicos aleatorizados (ECA) sobre los efectos de la inyección local de TB en la prevención de CH y QU en pacientes que recibieron o recibirán un trauma quirúrgico en la piel. Métodos y análisis: Revisión panorámica siguiendo la declaración PRIOR. Ejecutaremos la búsqueda en la base de datos Epistemonikos. Realizaremos la selección de estudios, extracción de datos y evaluación de la calidad de las RS por duplicado. Compararemos las revisiones a través de matrices de evidencia, incluyendo las RS que aborden una pregunta similar y los ECA incluidos en estas. Estimaremos la superposición entre revisiones mediante el método de área cubierta y área cubierta corregida. Ética y difusión: No se requiere aprobación ética. Esta revisión se publicará después de un proceso de revisión por pares. Sus resultados podrían ser utilizados por personal de salud para informar decisiones individuales y por tomadores de decisión de servicios de salud para guiar la asignación de recursos.

Introduction: Hypertrophic scars (HS) and keloids (KE) result from an aberrant reparative process in the skin, impacting the quality of life of those who are affected by them. Their treatment consists of different interventions, many of which are costly and/or have unpredictable results. Among them, botulinum toxin (BT) might have a preventive effect, although current evidence summaries show varying results. Therefore, we aim to synthesize the evidence coming from systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of local injection of TB in the prevention of HS and KE formation in patients after a surgical wound of the skin. Methods and analysis: This will be an overview of SRs following PRIOR statement. We will conduct the search in Epistemonikos Database. Two reviewers will independently conduct the screening of articles for inclusion, quality appraisal and data extraction. We will compare the SRs using an evidence matrix, including SRs that address this topic, and the RCTs included in them. We will estimate the overlap between them using the covered area method and corrected covered area index. Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval is not required. This review will be published after a peer-review process. The results will inform areas of future research and could be used by health personnel to make individual decisions, and by healthcare managers, administrators, and policymakers to guide resource allocation.

COVID-19 Living Overview of Evidence repository is highly comprehensive and can be used as a single source for COVID-19 studies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 Living OVerview of Evidence (COVID-19 L·OVE) is a public repository and classification platform for COVID-19 articles. The repository contains more than 430,000 articles as of September 20, 2021 and intends to provide a one-stop shop for COVID-19 evidence. Considering that systematic reviews conduct high-quality searches, this study assesses the comprehensiveness and currency of the repository against the total number of studies in a representative sample of COVID-19 systematic reviews. METHODS: Our sample was generated from all the studies included in the systematic reviews of COVID-19 published during April 2021. We estimated the comprehensiveness of COVID-19 L·OVE repository by determining how many of the individual studies in the sample were included in the COVID-19 L·OVE repository. We estimated the currency as the percentage of studies that was available in the COVID-19 L·OVE repository at the time the systematic reviews conducted their own search. RESULTS: We identified 83 eligible systematic reviews that included 2,132 studies. COVID-19 L·OVE had an overall comprehensiveness of 99.67% (2,125/2,132). The overall currency of the repository, that is, the proportion of articles that would have been obtained if the search of the reviews was conducted in COVID-19 L·OVE instead of searching the original sources, was 96.48% (2,057/2,132). Both the comprehensiveness and the currency were 100% for randomized trials (82/82). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 L·OVE repository is highly comprehensive and current. Using this repository instead of traditional manual searches in multiple databases can save a great amount of work to people conducting systematic reviews and would improve the comprehensiveness and timeliness of evidence syntheses. This tool is particularly important for supporting living evidence synthesis processes.

Disyunción maxilar rápida asistida con microtornillos en pacientes en crecimiento con deficiencia maxilar transversal / Miniscrew assisted rapid maxillary expansion in growing patients with transverse maxillary deficiency

RESUMEN: Introducción: La disyunción maxilar rápida tradicional (RME) ha sido el tratamiento de elección para corregir la maloclusión secundaria a la deficiencia maxilar transversal. Debido a las complicaciones que pueden presentar los pacientes, se han desarrollado técnicas de disyunción maxilar asistida por microtornillos (MARPE). Sin embargo, aún no hay consenso respecto a los reales beneficios de la disyunción maxilar rápida asistida por microtornillos por sobre la disyunción tradicional en pacientes jóvenes y en crecimiento. Métodos: Realizamos una búsqueda en Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante el cribado de múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, analizamos los datos de los estudios primarios, realizamos un metanálisis y preparamos una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. Resultados y conclusiones: Identificamos siete revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyeron seis estudios primarios, de los cuales todos corresponden a ensayos aleatorizados. Concluimos que: la disyunción maxilar rápida asistida por microtornillos (MARPE) probablemente disminuye la pérdida de hueso alveolar bucal y la resistencia de la vía aérea nasal en comparación a la disyunción maxilar rápida tradicional (RME) (certeza evidencia moderada). MARPE podría disminuir la inclinación dentaria y resultar en poca o nula diferencia en la percepción de dolor en comparación con RME (certeza de la evidencia baja). No es posible establecer con claridad si MARPE aumenta la expansión maxilar en comparación con RME, debido a que la certeza de la evidencia ha sido evaluada como muy baja.

ABSTRACT: Introduction: Traditional rapid maxillary expansion (RME) has been the gold-standard treatment to correct malocclusion secondary to transverse maxillary deficiency. Due to related complications, mini screw assisted maxillary expansion (MARPE) techniques have been developed. However, there is no consensus regarding the benefits of mini screw assisted maxillary expansion over traditional expansion in young and growing patients. Methods: We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. Results and conclusions: We identified seven systematic reviews including six studies overall, all of which were randomized trials. We concluded that mini screw maxillary expansion (MARPE) probably reduces buccal alveolar bone and nasal airway resistance compared to traditional rapid maxillary expansion (RME). MARPE may reduce dental inclination and result in little or no difference in pain perception compared to RME. We are uncertain whether MARPE improves maxillary expansion compared to RME, as the certainty of the evidence has been assessed as very low.