ABSTRACT
A well-informed diagnostic process results in better health outcomes and less overdiagnosis. While there have been studies conducted to explore doctors' knowledge, attitudes, and practice regarding diagnostic test information, there are no reports from Latin America. We invited physician readers of a Latin American medical journal to answer a survey on their professional and demographic characteristics and previous exposure to diagnostic information training. Two hundred fifteen responded, of whom 88% agreed to some extent that diagnostic information is helpful for clinical practice and that more training is needed. This brief exploratory survey underscores the need for more resources to train in the diagnostic process and the utilization of diagnostic information in clinical practice. However, given the limitations of this study, more evidence is needed.
Un proceso de diagnóstico bien informado da lugar a mejores resultados de salud y a menos sobrediagnósticos. Aunque se han realizado estudios para explorar los conocimientos, las actitudes y la práctica de los médicos en relación con la información sobre las pruebas diagnósticas, no existen estudios realizados en América Latina. Invitamos a los médicos lectores de una revista médica latinoamericana a responder una encuesta de opinión sobre sus características profesionales y demográficas y su exposición previa a la formación en información diagnóstica. Recibimos 215 respuestas, de las cuales el 88% estuvo de acuerdo en que la información diagnóstica es útil para la práctica clínica, y que se necesita más capacitación. Esta breve encuesta exploratoria subraya la necesidad de dedicar más recursos en la formación sobre el proceso diagnóstico y la utilización de la información diagnóstica en la práctica clínica. Sin embargo, dado las limitaciones de este estudio se hace necesario mayor evidencia al respecto.
Subject(s)
Physicians , Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires , Perception , Attitude of Health Personnel , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeABSTRACT
A well-informed diagnostic process results in better health outcomes and less overdiagnosis. While there have been studies conducted to explore doctors' knowledge, attitudes, and practice regarding diagnostic test information, there are no reports from Latin America. We invited physician readers of a Latin American medical journal to answer a survey on their professional and demographic characteristics and previous exposure to diagnostic information training. Two hundred fifteen responded, of whom 88% agreed to some extent that diagnostic information is helpful for clinical practice and that more training is needed. This brief exploratory survey underscores the need for more resources to train in the diagnostic process and the utilization of diagnostic information in clinical practice. However, given the limitations of this study, more evidence is needed.
Un proceso de diagnóstico bien informado da lugar a mejores resultados de salud y a menos sobrediagnósticos. Aunque se han realizado estudios para explorar los conocimientos, las actitudes y la práctica de los médicos en relación con la información sobre las pruebas diagnósticas, no existen estudios realizados en América Latina. Invitamos a los médicos lectores de una revista médica latinoamericana a responder una encuesta de opinión sobre sus características profesionales y demográficas y su exposición previa a la formación en información diagnóstica. Recibimos 215 respuestas, de las cuales el 88% estuvo de acuerdo en que la información diagnóstica es útil para la práctica clínica, y que se necesita más capacitación. Esta breve encuesta exploratoria subraya la necesidad de dedicar más recursos en la formación sobre el proceso diagnóstico y la utilización de la información diagnóstica en la práctica clínica. Sin embargo, dado las limitaciones de este estudio se hace necesario mayor evidencia al respecto.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The COmmunity Cohort Study aims to determine, after natural exposure to SARS-CoV-2 or anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines deployed in Chile to prevent COVID-19 in the context of the current pandemic, the strength and duration of detectable neutralising antibodies in adult ambulatory primary care patients with cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will set up a community-based longitudinal, prospective cohort study. The study will be conducted in two public outpatient clinics located in the southern district of Santiago, Chile. We expect to begin recruitment in the second quarter of 2022. Each patient will be followed up for at least 1 year after inclusion in the cohort. The eligible population will be adult patients registered in the Cardiovascular Health Programme. Exposure in this study is defined as any event where participants have contact with SARS-CoV-2 antigens from natural exposure or vaccination. The primary outcomes are seroconversion and strength and duration of the neutralising IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. Secondary outcomes are any COVID-19-related event or intercurrent morbidities or death. Data will be collected by extracting serial blood samples and administering a questionnaire at the first face-to-face contact and monthly follow-up time points. The sample size estimated for this study is 1060. We will characterise the cohort, determine the seroprevalence rate of neutralising antibodies at baseline and determine the rates of antibody decline using a longitudinal mixed-effects model. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Scientific Ethics Committee of the South Metropolitan Health Care Service approved the study protocol (Memorandum No 191/2021). We will present the results in two peer-reviewed publications and national and international professional and academic meetings. We will organise seminars with relevant stakeholders and hold town hall meetings with the local community. We will set up a COmmunity Cohort Study website at www.communitystudy.cl to disseminate the study purpose, research team and milestones.
