Effect of Pelvic Floor and Hip Muscle Strengthening in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of strengthening the hip muscles in addition to strengthening the pelvic floor muscles (PFM) in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. METHODS: This study used a prospective, assessor-blind, randomized clinical trial with parallel groups. We randomly allocated 47 individuals with stress urinary incontinence to 2 groups: 1 performing only pelvic floor strengthening exercises (PF, n = 21) and the other performing pelvic floor strengthening exercises plus exercises for the gluteus maximus and medius and hip adductor muscles (PFH, n = 22). Four individuals did not complete the study. Frequency of urine leakage was the primary outcome (3-day voiding diary and a follow-up voiding diary). Secondary outcomes were pelvic floor muscle strength (Ortiz scale, PERFECT scheme [Oxford Scale], and perineometry) and quality of life (QoL; International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form and King's Health Questionnaire), which were evaluated by a blinded assessor before and after 20 sessions over 10 weeks. RESULTS: Regarding the daily frequency of urine loss evaluated by the follow-up voiding diary, an effect of group was observed (P < .001), with the PFH group showing a significant decrease in daily loss frequency, although no significant differences were found in the comparison between groups for the 3-day voiding diary, QoL, or functional assessment of the PFM. CONCLUSION: Strengthening the PFM together with the hip synergic muscles showed better results for frequency of daily urine loss throughout the sessions, although there was no accompanying superiority in improvement of strength, perineometry, or QoL over the group that performed only PFM-strengthening exercises.

Effect of combined actions of hip adduction/abduction on the force generation and maintenance of pelvic floor muscles in healthy women.

Pelvic floor muscle (PFM) force and coordination are related to urinary incontinence severity and to sexual satisfaction. Health professionals frequently combine classic PFM exercises with hip adduction/abduction contraction to treat these disorders, but the real benefits of this practice are still unknown. Based on a theoretical anatomy approach whereby the levator ani muscle is inserted into the obturator internus myofascia and in which force generated by hip movements should increase the contraction quality of PFMs, our aim was to investigate the effects of isometric hip adduction and abduction on PFM force generation. Twenty healthy, nulliparous women were evaluated using two strain-gauge dynamometers (one cylinder-like inside the vaginal cavity, and the other measuring hip adduction/abduction forces around both thighs) while performing three different tasks: (a) isolated PFM contraction; (b) PFM contraction combined with hip adduction (30% and 50% maximum hip force); and (c) PFM contraction combined with hip abduction (30% and 50% maximum hip force). Data were sampled at 100Hz and subtracted from the offset if existent. We calculated a gradient between the isolated PFM contraction and each hip condition (Δ Adduction and Δ Abduction) for all variables: Maximum force (N), instant of maximum-force occurrence (s), mean force in an 8-second window (N), and PFM force loss (N.s). We compared both conditions gradients in 30% and 50% by paired t-tests. All variables did not differ between hip conditions both in 30% and 50% of maximum hip force (p>.05). PFM contraction combined with isometric hip abduction did not increase vaginal force in healthy and nulliparous women compared to PFM contraction combined with isometric hip adduction. Therefore, so far, the use of hip adduction or abduction in PFM training and treatments are not justified for improving PFM strength and endurance.