Targeted surgical coaching can improve operative self-assessment ability: A single-blinded nonrandomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of targeted surgical coaching on self-assessment of laparoscopic operative skill. Accurate self-assessment is vital for autonomous professional development. Surgical coaching can be used for performance improvement, but its role in this domain has been insufficiently investigated. METHODS: This was a single site, nonrandomized, interrupted time series design trial. Participants were residents, fellows, and attending surgeons regularly performing laparoscopic general surgery operations. Each participant was enrolled in an individualized coaching program using review of personal and peer laparoscopic videos. The program involved 3 to 5 sessions over a period of 6 to 19 weeks. Coaching used case debriefing to target self-assessment proficiency, with a focus on objective interpretation of observations and facilitative capacity building. The primary outcome measure was self-assessment accuracy and correlation to expert ratings. The Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill global rating scale was utilized for evaluation. RESULTS: Twelve participants were recruited and completed the coaching program. At baseline, there was no correlation between self-assessment and expert ratings. After completion of the coaching program there was correlation between self-assessment and expert ratings (P = .003) and improved self-assessment accuracy compared to baseline (P = .041). CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated that targeted coaching using video review of laparoscopic cases can improve operative self-assessment accuracy using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill.

Early Australian experience in robotic sleeve gastrectomy: a single site series.

BACKGROUND: The use of robotic platforms in bariatric surgery has recently gained relevance. With an increased use of this technology come concerns regarding learning curve effects during the initial implementation phase. The sleeve gastrectomy though may represent an ideal training procedure for introducing the robot into bariatric surgical practice. The present review of the first 10 consecutive robotic sleeve gastrectomy procedures performed in an Australian bariatric programme by a single surgeon describes the evolution of the technique, learning curve and initial patient outcomes. METHODS: Between 2014 and 2015, robotic sleeve gastrectomies were performed as primary and revisional procedures by a consistent surgeon-assistant team. Technique evolution and theatre set-up were documented. Patient demographics, operative time (robot docking and total operation time), additional operative procedures performed, operative and post-operative complications at 1, 3 and 6 months post-procedure and weight loss achieved at 6 months were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: Ten robotic sleeve gastrectomies were performed without significant operative complications. One patient was treated as an outpatient with oral antibiotics for a superficial wound infection. The median total operative time was 123 min (interquartile range (IQR) 108.8-142.5), with a median incision to docking time of 19 min (IQR 15.0-31.8). Length of stay in hospital was 2-3 days. Median excess weight loss achieved at 6 months was 50% (IQR 33.9-66.5). CONCLUSION: This study describes a method of safely introducing the da Vinci robot into bariatric surgical practice.