ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare baseline and 72-hour hormone levels in women with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and controls. SETTING: Hospital emergency department. PARTICIPANTS: 21 women ages 18-35 with TBI and 21 controls. DESIGN: Repeated measures. MAIN MEASURES: Serum samples at baseline and 72 hours; immunoassays for estradiol (E2), progesterone (PRO), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and cortisol (CORT); and health history. RESULTS: Women with TBI had lower E2 (p = 0.042) and higher CORT (p = 0.028) levels over time. Lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GSC) and OCs were associated with lower FSH (GCS p = 0.021; OCs p = 0.016) and higher CORT (GCS p = 0.001; OCs p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Acute TBI may suppress E2 and increase CORT in young women. OCs appeared to independently affect CORT and FSH responses. Future work is needed with a larger sample to characterize TBI effects on women's endogenous hormone response to injury and OC use's effects on post-TBI stress response and gonadal function, as well as secondary injury.
Subject(s)
Age Factors , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/metabolism , Brain Injuries/metabolism , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/pharmacology , Luteinizing Hormone/pharmacology , Adolescent , Adult , Estradiol/metabolism , Female , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/metabolism , Humans , Luteinizing Hormone/metabolism , Progesterone/metabolism , Young AdultABSTRACT
Pain is a ubiquitous part of the cancer experience. Often the presenting symptom of malignancy, pain becomes more prevalent in advanced or metastatic disease and often persists despite curative treatment. Although management of cancer pain improved following publication of the WHO's analgesic ladder, when used in isolation, conservative approaches often fail to control pain and are limited by intolerable side effects. Interventional strategies provide an option for managing cancer pain that remains refractory to pharmacologic therapy. The purpose of this review is to investigate these strategies and discuss the risks and benefits which must be weighed when considering their use. Therapies anticipated to have an increasingly important role in the future of cancer pain management are also discussed.
