Diagnosis of Central Precocious Puberty.

A thorough history and physical examination including Tanner staging and growth assessments can guide differential diagnosis and aid in the evaluation of precocious puberty. Basal luteinizing hormone levels measured using a highly sensitive assay can be helpful in diagnosing central precocious puberty (CPP). Brain MRI is indicated with males diagnosed with CPP and females under the age of 6 with CPP. As more information becomes available regarding the genetic etiologies of CPP, genetic testing may preclude the need for imaging studies and other hormonal testing, especially in familial cases.

Long-Acting Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogues for Central Precocious Puberty, Including 45-Mg 6-Month Subcutaneous Leuprolide Acetate: Use for Treatment and Treatment Monitoring.

INTRODUCTION: Studies of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (intramuscular [IM] leuprolide acetate [LA] and triptorelin) for treatment monitoring of central precocious puberty (CPP) demonstrate this approach is effective for confirming pubertal hormone suppression. Herein, we provide new data using subcutaneous LA (SC LA), suggesting similar efficacy for treatment monitoring. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL were searched for studies of GnRHa used to monitor treatment of CPP. The titles and the abstracts were reviewed; 5 studies were selected. Additionally, new unpublished data for SC LA from the original phase 3 trial (primary data published by Klein et al.) were evaluated. Serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and leuprolide levels at screening, 1, 4, and 6 h after the first dose SC LA were analyzed and plotted. RESULTS: Data from 162 children (155 girls) were evaluated. SC and IM LA produced overlapping median LH concentration curves and peak LH concentrations after the first dose. For IM LA, subsequent doses yielded suppressed peak LH levels (2.7 IU/L [mean]). For SC LA, subsequent doses also resulted in significant suppressed peak LH levels (0.2 ± 0.02 IU/L) and achieved sex-steroid hormone suppression of >98%. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to IM LA and triptorelin, long-acting SC LA shows similar burst kinetics and rapid LH rise after the first dose, followed by similar suppression of LH and sex steroids after subsequent doses. Since IM LA and triptorelin have demonstrated usefulness that is comparable to that of traditional GnRH stimulation testing for monitoring CPP, we presume that SC LA may be similarly employed.

A review of the genetics and epigenetics of central precocious puberty.

Gonadotrophin dependent sexual precocity, commonly referred to as central precocious puberty (CPP), results from a premature reactivation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis before the normal age of pubertal onset. CPP is historically described as girls who enter puberty before the age of eight, and boys before the age of nine. Females are more likely to be diagnosed with idiopathic CPP; males diagnosed with CPP have a greater likelihood of a defined etiology. These etiologies may include underlying CNS congenital defects, tumors, trauma, or infections as well as environmental, genetic, and epigenetic factors. Recently, genetic variants and mutations which may cause CPP have been identified at both the level of the hypothalamus and the pituitary. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), monogenetic mutations, and modifications of the epigenome have been evaluated in relationship to the onset of puberty; these variants are thought to affect the development, structure and function of GnRH neurons which may lead to either precocious, delayed, or absent pubertal reactivation. This review will describe recent advances in the field of the genetic basis of puberty and provide a clinically relevant approach to better understand these varying etiologies of CPP.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog therapies for children with central precocious puberty in the United States.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa's) are the standard treatment for children with central precocious puberty (CPP). We aim to present data on available GnRHa options with an easy-to-review table and discuss factors that influence treatment selection. Five GnRHa's are currently FDA-approved and prescribed in the US and published data suggest similar safety and efficacy profiles over the first year of treatment. One- and 3-month intramuscular (IM) leuprolide acetate (LA) have long-term safety and efficacy data and allow for flexible dosing. Six-month IM triptorelin pamoate offers a longer duration of treatment, but without long-term efficacy and outcome data. Six-month subcutaneous (SQ) LA combines a SQ route of injection and long duration of action but lacks long-term efficacy and outcome data. The 12-month SQ histrelin acetate implant avoids injections and offers the longest duration of action, but requires a minor surgical procedure with local or general anesthesia. Factors in treatment selection include route of administration, needle size, injection volume, duration of action, and cost. The current GnRHa landscape provides options with varying benefits and risks, allowing physicians and caregivers to select the most appropriate therapy based on the specific needs and concerns of the child and the caregiver. Agents have different advantages and disadvantages for use, with no one agent displaying superiority.

Suboptimal adherence to prescribed daily growth hormone regimen among medicaid beneficiaries in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to describe the adherence and discontinuation patterns of somatropin over 3 years among children with pGHD insured by Medicaid across the United States. METHODS: Eligible children were aged ≥3 and <16 years with Medicaid coverage, diagnosed with pGHD, and had ≥2 new prescriptions for somatropin between 1 July 2014 and 31 December 2018. Four non-exclusive patient cohorts were constructed (≥3, 12, 24, and 36 months of continuous enrollment after initial prescription). Suboptimal adherence was defined as medication possession ratio <0.80, and discontinuation as a gap of >60 days between somatropin fills. Logistic and proportional hazards regression methods were used to estimate odds of suboptimal adherence and time to discontinuation, respectively. RESULTS: In the 12-month cohort (n = 3623), mean age was 10.5 ± 3.2 years, 70.8% were male, 44.4% White, 29.1% Hispanic, 7.1% Black, and 1.7% Asian. At months 12, 24, and 36, the proportion with suboptimal adherence was 40.9, 50.4, 54.4%, respectively, and 49.2% of patients with ≥3 months of follow-up discontinued therapy. At 12 months, lower age and race/ethnicity (Black vs. White referent) had greater odds of suboptimal adherence. Discontinuation was associated with Black (vs. White referent) race and geographic region. CONCLUSIONS: Sociodemographic characteristics may be risk factors for suboptimal adherence and/or discontinuation of prescribed somatropin therapy. Improving GH regimen adherence among this at-risk population, and specifically among subgroups at highest risk, is warranted to improve clinical outcomes.

Efficacy and Safety of Weekly Somatrogon vs Daily Somatropin in Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency: A Phase 3 Study.

CONTEXT: Somatrogon is a long-acting recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in development for once-weekly treatment of children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of once-weekly somatrogon with once-daily somatropin in prepubertal children with GHD. METHODS: In this 12-month, open-label, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 study, participants were randomized 1:1 to receive once-weekly somatrogon (0.66 mg/kg/week) or once-daily somatropin (0.24 mg/kg/week) for 12 months. A total of 228 prepubertal children (boys aged 3-11 years, girls aged 3-10 years) with GHD, impaired height and height velocity (HV), and no prior rhGH treatment were randomized and 224 received ≥1 dose of study treatment (somatrogon: 109; somatropin: 115). The primary endpoint was annualized HV at month 12. RESULTS: HV at month 12 was 10.10 cm/year for somatrogon-treated subjects and 9.78 cm/year for somatropin-treated subjects, with a treatment difference (somatrogon-somatropin) of 0.33 (95% CI: -0.24, 0.89). The lower bound of the 2-sided 95% CI was higher than the prespecified noninferiority margin (-1.8 cm/year), demonstrating noninferiority of once-weekly somatrogon vs daily somatropin. HV at month 6 and change in height standard deviation score at months 6 and 12 were similar between both treatment groups. Both treatments were well tolerated, with a similar percentage of subjects experiencing mild to moderate treatment-emergent adverse events in both groups (somatrogon: 78.9%, somatropin: 79.1%). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of once-weekly somatrogon was noninferior to once-daily somatropin, with similar safety and tolerability profiles. (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT02968004).

Clinical characteristics and treatment patterns with histrelin acetate subcutaneous implants vs. leuprolide injections in children with precocious puberty: a real-world study using a US claims database.

OBJECTIVES: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs are the treatment of choice for central precocious puberty (CPP). This study characterizes patients treated with histrelin implant or leuprolide injection. METHODS: A US claims database was used to identify patients aged ≤20 years with ≥1 histrelin or leuprolide claim (index treatment) between April 2010 and November 2017 and continuous enrollment ≥3 months before and ≥12 months after the index treatment date. RESULTS: Overall, 4,217 patients (histrelin, n=1,001; leuprolide, n=3,216) were identified. The percentage of patients with CPP diagnosis was greater in the histrelin (96.5%) vs. leuprolide (68.8%; p<0.0001) cohort. In patients with CPP (histrelin, n=966; leuprolide, n=2,214), mean age at treatment initiation was similar for histrelin (9.0 ± 2.0 years) and leuprolide (9.1 ± 2.3 years), with >50% of patients aged 6-9 years. Mean treatment duration was significantly longer for histrelin (26.7 ± 14.8 months) vs. leuprolide (14.1 ± 12.1 months; p<0.0001), and was longer in younger patient groups. More patients switched from leuprolide to histrelin (12.3%) than vice versa (3.6%; p<0.0001). Median annual total treatment costs were slightly lower for the histrelin cohort ($23,071 [interquartile range, $16,833-$31,050]) than the leuprolide cohort ($27,021 [interquartile range, $18,314-$34,995]; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CPP treated with histrelin had a longer duration of treatment, lower rates of index treatment discontinuation, and lower annual treatment costs vs. those treated with leuprolide.

Y chromosome gene copy number and lack of autism phenotype in a male with an isodicentric Y chromosome and absent NLGN4Y expression.

We describe a unique male with a dicentric Y chromosome whose phenotype was compared to that of males with 47,XYY (XYY). The male Y-chromosome aneuploidy XYY is associated with physical, behavioral/cognitive phenotypes, and autism spectrum disorders. We hypothesize that increased risk for these phenotypes is caused by increased copy number/overexpression of Y-encoded genes. Specifically, an extra copy of the neuroligin gene NLGN4Y might elevate the risk of autism in boys with XYY. We present a unique male with the karyotype 46,X,idic(Y)(q11.22), which includes duplication of the Y short arm and proximal long arm and deletion of the distal long arm, evaluated his physical, behavioral/cognitive, and neuroimaging/magnetoencephalography (MEG) phenotypes, and measured blood RNA expression of Y genes. The proband had tall stature and cognitive function within the typical range, without autism features. His blood RNA showed twofold increase in expression of Yp genes versus XY controls, and absent expression of deleted Yq genes, including NLGN4Y. The M100 latencies were similar to findings in typically developing males. In summary, the proband had overexpression of a subset of Yp genes, absent NLGN4Y expression, without ASD findings or XYY-MEG latency findings. These results are consistent with a role for NLGN4Y overexpression in the etiology of behavioral phenotypes associated with XYY. Further investigation of NLGN4Y as an ASD risk gene in XYY is warranted. The genotype and phenotype(s) of this subject may also provide insight into how Y chromosome genes contribute to normal male development and the male predominance in ASD.

Veganism as a cause of iodine deficient hypothyroidism.

BACKGROUND: Iodine deficiency is the most common cause of acquired hypothyroidism worldwide. Although uncommon in the Western world, the incidence of iodine deficiency may be rising due to the increased use of restrictive diets. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a 23-month-old boy diagnosed with iodine deficiency hypothyroidism, induced by a vegan diet. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the risk for iodine deficiency in children on a vegan diet after discontinuation of breast/formula feeding that could lead to acquired hypothyroidism.

A 4-Year, Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Genotropin® Growth Hormone in Patients with Idiopathic Short Stature: Analysis of 4-Year Data Comparing Efficacy, Efficiency, and Safety between an Individualized, Target-Driven Regimen and Standard Dosing.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Growth hormone (GH) treatment regimens for children with non-GH-deficient, idiopathic short stature (ISS) have not been optimized. To compare the efficacy, efficiency, and safety of an individualized, target-driven GH regimen with standard weight-based dosing after 4 years of treatment. METHODS: This is a 4-year, open-label, multicenter, randomized trial comparing individualized, formula-based dosing of Genotropin® versus a widely used ISS dose of Genotropin®. Subjects were prepubertal, had a bone age of 3-10 years for males and 3-9 years for females, were naive to GH treatment, and had a height standard deviation score (Ht SDS) of -3 to -2.25, a height velocity <25th percentile for their bone age, and peak stimulated GH >10 ng/ml. After the first 2 years, the individualized-dosing group was further randomized to either 0.18 or 0.24 mg/kg/week. RESULTS: At 4 years, subjects in all treatment regimens achieved similar average height gains of +1.3 SDS; however, the individualized dosing regimen utilized less GH to achieve an equivalent height gain. CONCLUSION: Individualized, formula-based GH dosing, followed by a dose reduction after 2 years, provides a more cost-effective growth improvement in patients with ISS than currently employed weight-based regimens.

Long-Term Continuous Suppression With Once-Yearly Histrelin Subcutaneous Implants for the Treatment of Central Precocious Puberty: A Final Report of a Phase 3 Multicenter Trial.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: The histrelin implant has proven to be an effective method of delivering GnRH analog (GnRHa) therapy to children with central precocious puberty (CPP), yet there are limited data available regarding hormonal suppression and auxological changes during an extended course of therapy. DESIGN: This was a phase 3, prospective, open-label study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six children with CPP who participated in a phase 3, open-label study and required further GnRHa therapy were eligible to continue treatment receiving a new implant upon removal of the prior 12-month histrelin implant during a long-term extension phase. OUTCOME MEASURES: Hormone levels and auxologic parameters were measured periodically for up to 6 years of treatment and up to 1 year of posttreatment follow-up. RESULTS: Hormonal suppression was maintained throughout the study in patients who had prior GnRHa therapy (n = 16) and in treatment-naive patients (n = 20). Bone age to chronological age ratio decreased from 1.417 (n = 20) at baseline to 1.18 (n = 8) at 48 months in treatment-naive children (P < .01). Predicted adult height in girls increased from 151.9 cm at baseline to 166.5 cm at month 60 (n = 6; P < .05), with a 10.7-cm height gain observed among treatment-naive children (n = 5). No adverse effect on growth or recovery of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis was observed with hormonal suppression. The histrelin implant was generally well tolerated during long-term therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term histrelin implant therapy provided sustained gonadotropin suppression safely and effectively and improved predicted adult height in children with CPP.

Review of outcomes after cessation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment of girls with precocious puberty.

Although gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) have been the standard of care of central precocious puberty (CPP) management for many years, there are still questions about the long-term consequences of treatment. With increased utilization of GnRHa treatment, it is now possible to assess posttreatment outcomes in the immediate posttreatment period and into adulthood. This literature review reports on the long-term effects of GnRHa therapy in girls with CPP after therapy has been discontinued. Published reports confirm the reversibility of hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis suppression in females after cessation of GnRHa therapy, with the majority of patients achieving ovulatory menstrual cycles of normal timing and duration. GnRHa therapy does not appear to induce polycystic ovary syndrome or have long-term negative repercussions on either bone mineral density or body composition. Evidence is currently insufficient to identify agent-specific differences in outcomes, reproductive function, and health of offspring.

Random unstimulated pediatric luteinizing hormone levels are not reliable in the assessment of pubertal suppression during histrelin implant therapy.

BACKGROUND: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa)-stimulated luteinizing hormone (LH) is the standard hormonal assessment for both diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of children with central precocious puberty (CPP). Use of unstimulated (random) LH levels may be helpful in diagnosis and has gained popularity in monitoring GnRHa therapy despite lack of validation against stimulated values. The objective of this investigation was to assess the suitability of random LH for monitoring pubertal suppression during GnRHa treatment. METHODS: Data from a multi-year, multicenter, open-label trial of annual histrelin implants for CPP was used for our analysis. Children meeting clinical and hormonal criteria for CPP, either naïve to GnRHa therapy or previously treated with another GnRHa for at least 6 months who were being treated at academic pediatric centers were included in the study. Subjects received a single 50-mg subcutaneous histrelin implant annually until final explant at an age determined at the discretion of each investigator. Monitoring visits for physical examination and GnRHa-stimulation testing were performed at regular intervals. The main outcome measure was pubertal suppression during treatment defined by peak LH < 4 mIU/mL after GnRHa stimulation. RESULTS: During histrelin treatment, 36 children underwent a total of 308 monitoring GnRHa stimulation tests. Unstimulated and peak LH levels were positively correlated (r = 0.798), and both declined from the first to second year of treatment. Mean ± SD peak LH level during therapy was 0.62 ± 0.43 mIU/mL (range, 0.06-2.3), well below the normal prepubertal mean. Mean random LH was 0.35 ± 0.25 mIU/mL (range, 0.04-1.5), 10-fold higher than the normal prepubertal mean. The random LH levels were above the prepubertal upper threshold (<0.3 mIU/mL) in 48.4% of all tests and in 88.9% of subjects at some point during therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast with GnRHa-stimulated LH, unstimulated LH values frequently fail to demonstrate suppression to prepubertal values during GnRHa therapy for CPP, despite otherwise apparent pubertal suppression, and are thus unsuitable for therapeutic monitoring. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT00779103.

Ease of use and preference for a new disposable self-injection pen compared with a reusable pen for administering recombinant human growth hormone: A multicenter, 2-month, single-arm, open-label clinical trial in patient-caregiver dyads.

BACKGROUND: Improved ease of use of drug-delivery devices may enhance compliance. Development of an easier-to-use device for administration of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) may thus be beneficial for patients and their caregivers. OBJECTIVE: This study compared ease of use and preference for a new disposable rhGH injection pen relative to previous experience with the currently available reusable pen in standard practice. Both pens deliver the same formulation of rhGH. METHODS: This multicenter, single-arm, open-label study assessed ease of use and preference for the 2 injection pens in patient-caregiver dyads. Eligible children were aged 8 through 18 years, were currently being treated with rhGH, and had been compliant with use of the current reusable pen for ≥ 3 months before study entry. A validated self-reported Injection Pen Assessment Questionnaire was administered twice during the study-at baseline (to assess perceptions of the reusable pen) and after 2 months of use of the new disposable pen-to assess ease of use of the individual pens (rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale), the comparative ease of use of the 2 pens, and pen preference. The primary end point was the proportion of dyads who rated the new pen as no different or easier to use than the current pen. Regardless of treatment or suspected causal relationship to the investigational product, all observed or volunteered adverse events (AEs) were recorded and rated as mild, moderate, or severe. RESULTS: Of 137 screened dyads, 136 (91 boys, 45 girls) were included in the safety population and 133 were included in the efficacy population. The children had a mean age of 12.3 years, a mean weight of 42.2 kg, a mean height of 145.9 cm, and a mean body mass index of 19.3 kg/m(2); 84.6% of the children were white. The majority (82.4%) of adult dyad members were subjects' mothers. The adult dyad members were more likely than the child members to be responsible for preparing the injection (82.0%) and administering the injection (72.9%). Overall, 73.7% of dyads rated the new disposable pen no different or easier to use than the reusable pen (95% CI, 66.2%-81.2%), and 65.2% rated the disposable pen no different or preferable to the reusable pen (95% CI, 57.0%-73.3%). Overall, 60 all-causality AEs occurred in 28 subjects (20.6%), most of them (93.3%) either mild or moderate in intensity. Eight device-related AEs occurred in 7 subjects (5.1%) (injection-site hematoma in 3 and injection-site pain in 5). The most common AEs were headache (7 events), injection-site pain (5), upper respiratory tract infection (4), and pyrexia (4). No deaths or serious AEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly three quarters of patients and caregivers reported that the new disposable pen was no different or easier to use than the reusable pen, and nearly two thirds preferred the disposable pen. No safety concerns were identified. The findings suggest that the improvements in the new pen were recognized by patients and caregivers.