Intralymphatic immunotherapy for mountain cedar pollinosis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy can provide long-term benefits, including symptomatic relief and reduced disease progression, but it requires a lengthy regimen that presents barriers to patient adherence. Thus, there is a need for improved approaches to immunotherapy. Recently, several clinical trials have reported successful results from intralymphatic immunotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intralymphatic immunotherapy for allergies caused by mountain cedar pollen in a proof-of-concept study. METHODS: A total of 21 patients with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis because of mountain cedar pollen were randomized to receive 3 monthly intralymphatic injections of allergenic extract or placebo before the 2018-2019 mountain cedar pollen season. Safety was monitored during treatment to the end of the pollen season using structured and spontaneous reports. Clinical efficacy information was collected using a daily electronic diary of symptoms and allergy medication. Allergen-specific serum immunoglobulin E was assessed before treatment and at the end of the study. RESULTS: There were no serious adverse events or systemic reactions in either group. A total of 4 patients experienced mild injection-site reactions. Patients receiving intralymphatic immunotherapy experienced a significant improvement in allergy symptoms and medication use relative to patients receiving placebo (P < .001), and the active treatment group had lower average total combined scores on 20 of 27 days during the peak pollen season (P < .05). There was no significant difference among groups in changes to mean mountain cedar-specific serum immunoglobulin E levels. CONCLUSION: In this proof-of-concept trial, intralymphatic immunotherapy was well tolerated and improved the symptoms and medication use associated with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis caused by mountain cedar pollen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under the registration number NCT03682965 before the enrollment of the first subject.

Real-World Experience with Peanut Oral Immunotherapy: Lessons Learned From 270 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy (PA) is a significant and increasing problem, interfering with psychological development and family life. The standard recommendation to avoid peanut products and have access to injectable epinephrine is often inadequate. Oral immunotherapy for PA has been formally studied. Clinical observations of allergen immunotherapy have repeatedly enhanced patient care. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to report observations on the treatment of 270 patients with PA over 8.5 years. METHODS: This is a retrospective record review of patients beginning peanut oral immunotherapy between January 1, 2009, and June 1, 2017, approved by the North Texas Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: A total of 270 patients aged 4 to 18 years comprising 107 girls and 163 boys were treated. A total of 214 of 270 patients (79%) completed immunotherapy escalation. Age (P < .001) and peanut IgE (P < .001) correlate inversely with completing dose escalation. Epinephrine-treated reactions in 63 and isolated gastrointestinal symptoms in 101 patients, respectively, were the most common adverse reactions to treatment but did not preclude success. Peanut IgE decreased by 65% after 3 years of maintenance treatment and 14 of 214 patients (6.5%) were able to achieve sustained unresponsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: In an allergy office practice setting, 79% of patients are able to complete a peanut desensitization protocol and maintain the desensitized state indefinitely with daily dosing. With appropriate planning and precautions, peanut oral immunotherapy may be performed in an allergy office. Careful observations of clinical treatment can contribute to the development of effective treatment strategies.

One Child's Food Fight: A Case Study of Oral Immunotherapy Treatment for Food Allergies.

The prevalence of food allergy has risen dramatically in the last two decades. Primary care providers encounter food-allergic children on a daily basis. Although the standard of care has traditionally been strict avoidance of the allergen and advisement to carry an epinephrine autoinjector in case of an accidental exposure resulting in a severe reaction, food allergy research has progressed in the past decade concerning various immunotherapies that may provide an alternate treatment strategy. Oral immunotherapy (OIT), performed under the supervision of an allergist, is the most widely studied of these therapies. In the past, OIT has been available in the realm of clinical trials, but it is now being offered by a small but increasing number of allergists in private practice throughout the United States. Pediatric primary care clinicians should be aware of both the risks and possible benefits of this treatment, because they are likely to encounter patients who may inquire about OIT in their practices. In this case report, use of OIT will be reviewed in the treatment of a food-allergic child.

Epidemiology of anaphylaxis at a tertiary care center: A report of 730 cases.

BACKGROUND: Recent data reveal that the rate of anaphylaxis is increasing and suggest that idiopathic anaphylaxis may account for most of these cases. OBJECTIVE: To determine the pattern of anaphylaxis at a tertiary care referral center. METHODS: A retrospective electronic medical record review spanning 12 years (2002-2013) identified patients with anaphylaxis. RESULTS: Of the 4,777 records reviewed, 730 patients met our anaphylaxis definition. Median age was 34.0 years; 72.7% were adults, 58.6% were female, and 86.8% were white. Median time to evaluation by an allergist was 8.8 months. Foods were the most common cause (29.9%), followed by Hymenoptera venom (24.6%), idiopathic anaphylaxis (13.7%), and medications (13.3%). The most common foods were peanuts (23.9%), tree nuts (21.6%), shellfish (16.1%), and egg and milk (both 10.1%). The most common cause of anaphylaxis in adults was Hymenoptera venom. The most frequent symptoms were urticaria and/or angioedema, reported in 84.7% of cases. Atopy was present in 43.8%. In 15.4% of cases, anaphylaxis was not the chief reason for the office visit. CONCLUSION: We found food allergy was the most common overall cause of anaphylaxis, with peanut the most frequent food trigger. Idiopathic anaphylaxis was not the most common cause but accounted for 13.7% of all cases. Approximately 1 in 6 cases of anaphylaxis may be missed if a comprehensive evaluation is not performed.

Asthma in African Americans: what can we do about the higher rates of disease?

African Americans not only have a higher prevalence of asthma than whites, they also are encumbered with higher rates of asthma-associated morbidity and death. Factors such as genetics, socioeconomic status, health maintenance behaviors, air quality, and obesity likely contribute in combination to these burdens. Further work is needed to better understand these complex risk factors. To remedy these disparities, we need to ensure that patients at higher risk are given proper care and the knowledge to control their asthma.

A study of the link between gastric reflux and chronic sinusitis in adults.

Much discussion is taking place regarding the role of gastric reflux disease in the development and maintenance of chronic sinus disease. We studied 31 patients in a large urban private practice who had recalcitrant chronic sinusitis despite aggressive medical and surgical therapy. After we obtained information on the severity of each patient's sinus disease, we performed either double- or triple-catheter probe pH testing to assess the presence of reflux disease. Of the 30 patients who were successfully tested (1 patient did not tolerate probe testing), 25 demonstrated reflux disease, including 2 whose reflux reached the level of the nasopharynx. These 25 patients were placed on a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) regimen and reassessed at least 1 month later. At follow-up, 14 of 15 evaluable patients demonstrated at least some improvement in their sinus symptoms, including 7 who experienced either a complete or almost-complete resolution of symptoms. The improvements in sinus symptoms corresponded with improvements in reflux symptoms. These findings suggest that antireflux therapy might play a role in the treatment of recalcitrant chronic sinus disease.