ABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate if the treatment performed using high-pull traction on a Stephenson plate had real orthopaedic outcomes in subjects with severe Class II Division 1 malocclusion due to maxillary protrusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three growing patients showing Class II Division 1 malocclusion (Stephenson plate group, SPG) were treated and compared with an untreated Class II control group (CG - 21 subjects selected from the database of Bolton-Brush Growth Study). Lateral cephalograms at T0 and T1 for both groups were analysed using cephalometric tracing by Jarabak, Pancherz and Ghosh-Nanda. RESULTS: Orthopaedic forces were applied in SPG. SPG group showed significantly greater decrease than CG group of SNA° (-1.4° vs +0.7°), ANB° (-1.3° vs +0°), WITS (-1° vs 0.6°), overjet (-4.1 mm vs +0.3 mm), molar relationships (-6.1° mm vs -0.1 mm) and upper incisors proclination (1/SpP, -10.3° vs -1°). The maxilla substantially maintained its position (A/OLp +0.3 mm, SNA° -1.4°) while the mandible slightly grew (Pg/OLp +1.7 mm; SNB° + 0.7°). Facial pattern and AFA/AFP ratio did not change. CONCLUSION: The high-pull traction on the Stephenson plate produced more dental than skeletal outcomes in growing subjects, despite of the application of orthopaedic forces.
Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class II , Maxilla , Cephalometry , Extraoral Traction Appliances , Humans , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/therapy , Mandible , Prospective Studies , TractionABSTRACT
AIM: To evaluate the consequences of prolonged sucking habits on the development of the orofacial complex in deciduous dentition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out involving 235 preschool children. A questionnaire for children parents and clinical examinations were carried out by calibrated blinded examiners. The chi-square test and the T-Student test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of non-nutritive sucking habits (NNSH) in the sample was 74%. Anterior open-bite (AOB) was detected in 18%, and it was significantly related to non-nutritive sucking habits, bottle-feeding (only in the 3-year-old group) and persistent use of pacifier (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: NNSH and type of feeding were important contributing factors in the development of anterior open-bite in deciduous dentition.
Subject(s)
Fingersucking , Open Bite/epidemiology , Pacifiers/statistics & numerical data , Bottle Feeding/statistics & numerical data , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Prevalence , Tooth, DeciduousABSTRACT
AIM: This was to clarify dentoalveolar, skeletal and facial profile modifications induced by Fränkel II functional treatment in Class II division 1 subjects in prepubertal stages CS1-2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Evaluation of 25 caucasian subjects (15 males, 10 females), mean age 8y 11m, in vertebral stages CS1-2. The mean duration of functional treatment was 1y 11m. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective controlled study. The sample was evaluated at T0, start of treatment, and T1, end of Fränkel II therapy. Untreated subjects in Class II division 1 were the control group. STATISTICS: T-test for paired data was calculated before and after treatment (P< 0.05). RESULTS: A statistically significant increase between T0 and T1 was obtained for SNB (p = 0.022), ANB (p <0.001), Mx/Mn differential (p = 0.001), Co-Go-Me (p = 0.014), OJ (p < 0.001), OB (p = 0.042), IMPA (p = 0.021) . OJ (p < 0.001) and OB (p = 0.003) showed a higher significant change in the Fränkel group compared to control group. CONCLUSION: The Fränkel II appliance produced, in CS1-2 subiects, significant effects in teeth position, skeletal modifications and soft tissue changes, although the pubertal growth spurt would occur at least two years later.
Subject(s)
Malocclusion, Angle Class II/therapy , Orthodontic Appliance Design , Orthodontic Appliances, Functional , Retrognathia/therapy , Cephalometry/methods , Child , Chin/pathology , Dentition, Mixed , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Malocclusion, Angle Class II/pathology , Mandible/pathology , Mandibular Condyle/pathology , Maxilla/pathology , Nasal Bone/pathology , Overbite/pathology , Overbite/therapy , Prospective Studies , Retrognathia/pathology , Sella Turcica/pathologyABSTRACT
AIM: To compare the efficacy of manual and oscillating-rotating electric toothbrushes in removing plaque and reducing gingivitis in patients with fixed orthodontic appliances. STUDY DESIGN: Randomised clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 20 subjects aged 10 to 14 years (8 males; 12 females) scheduled for fixed orthodontic treatment were enrolled, randomly divided into two groups, A and B, and later assigned electric or manual toothbrushes, respectively. Three months after orthodontic appliance bonding (T1), and again after a further 4 (T2) and 8 (T3) weeks, plaque levels (PI), gingival bleeding (GBI) and hypertrophy were assessed. RESULTS: Between the two toothbrush types, statistically significant differences in PI were detected from T2 to T3 (P value 0.010), but not from T1 to T2. In contrast, the GBI was significantly different from T1 to T2 (P value 0.025), but not from T2 to T3. CONCLUSION: With respect to the manual orthodontic toothbrush, the electric oscillating-rotating toothbrush was found to better improve both PI and GBI.
