APPaRENT 3: Asthma Patients' and Physicians' Perspectives on the Burden and Management of Asthma in Seven Countries.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma management is strongly dependent on physician and patient beliefs and perceptions about the disease and its long-term treatment. The APPaRENT 3 study was conducted to explore factors influencing treatment choice and to understand patients' and physicians' attitudes and perspectives on the use of controller inhalers in regular versus flexible dosing for asthma management. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey of patients with asthma and treating physicians was conducted in seven countries: Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam (patient survey only), Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. Assessment was carried out through an online/face-to-face questionnaire, where patients' viewpoints were focused on their attitudes and beliefs about asthma and treatment adherence, whereas physicians' viewpoints were gathered on their attitudes and beliefs about asthma management, knowledge of and adherence to asthma treatment guidelines, and asthma treatment regimens. RESULTS: Overall, 1400 patients (mean age, 34 years) and 599 physicians (mean age, 43 years) were included in the survey. Physicians similarly prioritised symptom control (39%) and exacerbation reduction (40%) in moderate asthma, whereas patients prioritised symptom control (41%) over exacerbation reduction (22%). Although both groups (physicians, 86%; patients, 84%) perceived asthma as well-controlled, poor management was evident based on Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores (mean, 15.7; standard deviation, 4.14; 82% had an ACT score < 20) and high symptom burden (39% reported nighttime awakenings or early mornings ≥ 2 nights/week). Most patients (76%) with moderate asthma were prescribed regular dosing, with the most common treatment being inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA) with as-needed inhaled short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA; 20%). Among patients on maintenance and reliever therapy, 93% of patients received a separate inhaled reliever. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high symptom burden, patients overestimated their level of asthma control. Physicians prioritised controlling symptoms and reducing exacerbations as treatment goals for moderate asthma, often prescribing regular dosing with ICS/LABA with as-needed inhaled SABA.

Managing asthma depends a lot on what doctors and patients think about the illness and its long-term treatment. This study looked into what influences treatment decisions and what patients and doctors think about using inhalers regularly or on an as-needed basis to manage asthma across seven countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam [patient survey only], Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates). In this study, patients with asthma and doctors managing asthma completed an online/face-to-face questionnaire. The study aimed to understand what patients think about asthma and their treatment plan. Meanwhile, the doctors were asked what they think about managing asthma and how much they apply clinical guidelines for treating patients with asthma. Doctors believed it is equally important to control symptoms and prevent worsening of symptoms in patients with moderate asthma, while patients cared more about controlling symptoms than preventing worsening of symptoms. While doctors and patients both regarded asthma as well-controlled, many patients had low Asthma Control Test scores and experienced a lot of symptoms, suggesting that they are poor perceivers of asthma control. Most patients with moderate asthma were given regular treatment, usually with inhaled corticosteroid combined with long-acting ß₂-agonist along with as-needed short-acting ß₂-agonist as a reliever. Most patients who were prescribed the same inhaler for regular use and as a reliever also had a separate inhaler for quick relief of symptoms. This study shows the need for patients and doctors to have better conversations about asthma, its treatments, and what to expect from them.

Characteristics and outcomes of patients enrolled in the Connect 360 benralizumab patient support programme in the UK: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Patient support programmes (PSPs) allow patients with chronic diseases to receive treatment and support at home. This study describes the Connect 360 PSP delivery and impact on patient-reported outcomes, satisfaction and adherence/persistence among benralizumab-treated patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). METHODS: A non-interventional retrospective cohort study using data collected during routine care in the Connect 360 PSP. All consenting enrollees (≥18 years) were included in the study. RESULTS: 746 patients formed the study cohort. Mean (SD) age was 53.7 (14.5) years on PSP entry; 38.3% were female (38.7% unknown). 79.6% of patients were experienced biological therapy users. Oral corticosteroid (OCS) use was reported in 48.4% of patients at baseline and 34.8% at 48 weeks. 8.2% of patients reported asthma hospitalisation in the previous 6 months at 24 weeks vs 3.0% at 48 weeks. Mean (SD) 6-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-6) scores were 2.7 (1.5) at baseline vs 1.6 (1.3) at 48 weeks. Mean (SD) patient satisfaction scores remained high (4.5 of 5 (1.0) at baseline; 4.7 of 5 (0.6) at 48 weeks). 28.3% of patients were considered adherent at 24 weeks, increasing to 98.3% when supplemented with sales/delivery data (sensitivity analysis). Discontinuation from PSP/benralizumab was low at 24 (3.4%/3.0%) and 48 (12.6%/5.8%) weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Connect 360 PSP achieved high levels of satisfaction and persistence, with indications of positive outcomes including OCS use, hospitalisation and ACQ-6. The study was conducted during COVID-19, so it provides reassurance that patients with SEA receiving benralizumab may be supported safely and effectively at home.

A real world study of cough burden and quality of life of UK patients who have undergone evaluation for chronic cough.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment options for adults with chronic cough (CC) are limited. This study reports on the health status and experiences of patients with recent healthcare evaluation for CC. METHODS: This prospective, UK, cross-sectional study surveyed adults with a CC evaluation within the previous 12 months. All were never smokers (or ex-smokers for ≥12 months). Subjects completed five validated patient-reported outcome measures: cough visual analogue scale (VAS), EuroQoL 5 dimension, 5 level (EQ-5D-5L), EQ-5D VAS, Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 101 participants were recruited: 71% were female, mean age was 54.9 ± 15.2 years. Median (IQR) CC duration was 36 (11, 120) months. Mean self-reported CC severity (Cough-VAS) was 51.3 ± 22.9 over the previous 2 weeks and 62.9 ± 23.7 on the worst day of coughing. EQ-5D values were lower for CC patients than population norms. Subanalyses revealed that EQ-5D and LCQ scores were significantly impacted by CC duration and the number of healthcare providers (HCPs) visited. WPAI analysis showed a 27.6% work time impairment because of participants' CC. The number of HCP attendances ranged from 1 to 10 (3.3 ± 2.8) before diagnosis was confirmed. Treatment was being prescribed to 87% of participants and comprised mainly steroids (nasal [19%] and inhaled [25%]), beta agonists (24%), and proton pump inhibitors (21%); 44% of patients were dissatisfied with treatment efficacy. CONCLUSION: Real-world data from a nationally representative UK population show significant unmet needs associated with CC, including multiple healthcare visits and limited treatment effectiveness, resulting in inadequate cough control and impaired health status.

Impact of fragility fractures on activities of daily living and productivity in community-dwelling women: a multi-national study.

We estimated the short-term impact of fragility fractures on community-dwelling women in five countries. Women with fragility fractures reported significantly more difficulties performing activities of daily living and significantly higher levels of lost productivity and caregiver support than those without fractures; results highlight the multi-country indirect burden of fragility fractures. INTRODUCTION: To estimate the impact of fragility fractures on activities of daily living (ADL), productivity loss and caregiver support in women with a recent fragility fracture. METHODS: This multi-centre cross-sectional study enrolled community-dwelling women aged ≥ 50 years in South Korea, Spain, Germany, Australia and the United States. The fragility fracture cohort consisted of women with an index fragility fracture in the past 12 months; the fracture free cohort consisted of women with no fracture in the 18 months prior to study enrolment. Study participants completed three validated questionnaires: Lawton Instrumental ADL (IADL), Physical Self-Maintenance Scale (PSMS) and iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ). RESULTS: In total, 1,253 participants from 41 sites across the five countries were included. Compared with the fracture free cohorts, fragility fracture cohorts had significantly lower function and were more dependent on support (p < 0.05 in all countries for Lawton IADL, and in South Korea, Spain, Australia and the United States for PSMS), significantly higher hours of paid absenteeism (p < 0.05, Spain, Germany, Australia), significantly higher unpaid lost productivity (p < 0.05, South Korea, Spain, Germany), significantly more days of paid help received in the home (p < 0.05 South Korea, Spain and the United States), and significantly more days of unpaid help from family members or friends (p < 0.05, all countries). CONCLUSION: In this multi-national study, fragility fractures in community-dwelling ≥ 50 years women were associated with several outcomes indicating higher indirect burden and lower quality of life, including more difficulties performing ADL and higher levels of lost productivity and caregiver support.

Usage of epidermal growth factor mutation testing and impact on treatment patterns in non-small cell lung cancer: An international observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (EGFRm) are common oncogene drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This real-world study explored treatment patterns and time to receive EGFRm test results in patients with advanced EGFRm NSCLC. METHODS: A cross-sectional medical chart review was completed May-August 2020 in Australia, Canada, Germany, Italy, South Korea, Taiwan, UK, and USA. Eligible patients had advanced NSCLC and a positive EGFRm test result January-December 2017. Data were abstracted from NSCLC diagnosis to end of follow-up (31 March 2020) or patient's death whichever occurred earlier. The index date was the date of EGFRm confirmation. RESULTS: 223 physicians provided data for 1,793 patients. Patients' mean age was 64.7 years, 54 % were male, 30.7 % had no history of smoking. Overall, 78 % of EGFRm test results were received ≤ 2 weeks after request (range of median 7-14 days across countries). Median time from advanced NSCLC diagnosis to EGFRm test result was 18 days (median range 10-22 days across countries). Over a third (37 %) of patients received a systemic treatment prior to EGFRm result; chemotherapy (25 %) and EGFR-TKI (15 %) were most commonly prescribed; post-EGFR test-result was EGFR-TKI (68 %); 80 % of patients initiated EGFR-TKI at any time point post-NSCLC diagnosis. Of those receiving a first-line EGFR-TKI post-EGFRm testing, 84 % received a TKI alone, 12 % in combination with chemotherapy, and 3 % with other treatments. Median time from first-line EGFR-TKI initiation post-EGFRm testing to first subsequent treatment was 19.8 months. CONCLUSION: Over one-fifth of patients wait >14 days for their EGFRm test results, affecting their likelihood of receiving first-line EGFR-TKI with 20 % of patients never receiving EGFR TKI treatment. There was significant inter-country variability in the proportion of patients receiving EGFR TKIs. Our study highlights the need to improve EGFRm testing turnaround times and treatment initiation across countries.